A Methodology Establishing Linear Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods under PL Inequality
0
🎯
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a methodology for establishing linear convergence of adaptive gradient methods in non-convex optimization problems under the Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) inequality.
- The authors focus on the AdaGrad algorithm, demonstrating its linear convergence under the PL inequality.
- The results have implications for the convergence analysis of other adaptive gradient methods, such as Adam and Refined-AdaGrad.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a technique for proving that certain optimization algorithms, called "adaptive gradient methods," will quickly converge to the optimal solution when the problem being optimized has a particular mathematical property known as the Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) inequality.
The authors focus on a specific algorithm called AdaGrad, showing that it will converge linearly (meaning it gets closer and closer to the optimal solution at a constant rate) under the PL inequality. This is an important result because it means AdaGrad can solve certain non-convex optimization problems efficiently.
The findings in this paper could also help analyze the convergence of other popular adaptive gradient methods, like Adam and Refined-AdaGrad. Adaptive gradient methods are widely used in machine learning and optimization, so understanding their convergence properties is crucial.
Technical Explanation
The paper establishes a methodology for proving the linear convergence of adaptive gradient methods, such as AdaGrad, under the Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) inequality. The PL inequality is a condition that bounds the difference between the function value and the optimal function value in terms of the gradient norm.
The key technical contributions are:
- Derivation of a general framework for analyzing the linear convergence of adaptive gradient methods under the PL inequality.
- Detailed analysis of the AdaGrad algorithm, showing that it satisfies the linear convergence guarantee under the PL inequality.
- Discussion of the implications of the AdaGrad results for the convergence analysis of other adaptive gradient methods, such as Adam and Refined-AdaGrad.
The authors leverage various technical tools, including the PL inequality, the update rules of adaptive gradient methods, and careful analysis of the algorithm-specific parameters, to derive the linear convergence guarantees.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of AdaGrad under the PL inequality. The authors acknowledge that the PL inequality is a stronger assumption than the typical gradient dominance condition used in the analysis of non-convex optimization. However, they argue that the PL inequality is still a reasonable assumption in many practical scenarios.
One potential limitation of the work is that the analysis is specific to AdaGrad, and the authors only briefly discuss the implications for other adaptive gradient methods, such as Adam and Refined-AdaGrad. It would be interesting to see if the methodology can be extended to these other algorithms in a more detailed manner.
Additionally, the authors do not provide any empirical validation of their theoretical results. It would be helpful to see if the linear convergence guarantees hold in practice on real-world optimization problems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel methodology for establishing the linear convergence of adaptive gradient methods, such as AdaGrad, under the Polyak-Łojasiewicz (PL) inequality. The authors demonstrate the linear convergence of AdaGrad and discuss the implications for the convergence analysis of other adaptive gradient methods.
The findings in this work contribute to the theoretical understanding of the convergence properties of adaptive gradient methods, which are widely used in machine learning and optimization. This knowledge can help practitioners select and tune these algorithms more effectively for solving challenging non-convex optimization problems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎯
0
A Methodology Establishing Linear Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods under PL Inequality
Kushal Chakrabarti, Mayank Baranwal
Adaptive gradient-descent optimizers are the standard choice for training neural network models. Despite their faster convergence than gradient-descent and remarkable performance in practice, the adaptive optimizers are not as well understood as vanilla gradient-descent. A reason is that the dynamic update of the learning rate that helps in faster convergence of these methods also makes their analysis intricate. Particularly, the simple gradient-descent method converges at a linear rate for a class of optimization problems, whereas the practically faster adaptive gradient methods lack such a theoretical guarantee. The Polyak-{L}ojasiewicz (PL) inequality is the weakest known class, for which linear convergence of gradient-descent and its momentum variants has been proved. Therefore, in this paper, we prove that AdaGrad and Adam, two well-known adaptive gradient methods, converge linearly when the cost function is smooth and satisfies the PL inequality. Our theoretical framework follows a simple and unified approach, applicable to both batch and stochastic gradients, which can potentially be utilized in analyzing linear convergence of other variants of Adam.
Read more7/18/2024
🛠️
0
On the Convergence of Adaptive Gradient Methods for Nonconvex Optimization
Dongruo Zhou, Jinghui Chen, Yuan Cao, Ziyan Yang, Quanquan Gu
Adaptive gradient methods are workhorses in deep learning. However, the convergence guarantees of adaptive gradient methods for nonconvex optimization have not been thoroughly studied. In this paper, we provide a fine-grained convergence analysis for a general class of adaptive gradient methods including AMSGrad, RMSProp and AdaGrad. For smooth nonconvex functions, we prove that adaptive gradient methods in expectation converge to a first-order stationary point. Our convergence rate is better than existing results for adaptive gradient methods in terms of dimension. In addition, we also prove high probability bounds on the convergence rates of AMSGrad, RMSProp as well as AdaGrad, which have not been established before. Our analyses shed light on better understanding the mechanism behind adaptive gradient methods in optimizing nonconvex objectives.
Read more6/21/2024
🛠️
0
Non-convergence of Adam and other adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimization methods for non-vanishing learning rates
Steffen Dereich, Robin Graeber, Arnulf Jentzen
Deep learning algorithms - typically consisting of a class of deep neural networks trained by a stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization method - are nowadays the key ingredients in many artificial intelligence (AI) systems and have revolutionized our ways of working and living in modern societies. For example, SGD methods are used to train powerful large language models (LLMs) such as versions of ChatGPT and Gemini, SGD methods are employed to create successful generative AI based text-to-image creation models such as Midjourney, DALL-E, and Stable Diffusion, but SGD methods are also used to train DNNs to approximately solve scientific models such as partial differential equation (PDE) models from physics and biology and optimal control and stopping problems from engineering. It is known that the plain vanilla standard SGD method fails to converge even in the situation of several convex optimization problems if the learning rates are bounded away from zero. However, in many practical relevant training scenarios, often not the plain vanilla standard SGD method but instead adaptive SGD methods such as the RMSprop and the Adam optimizers, in which the learning rates are modified adaptively during the training process, are employed. This naturally rises the question whether such adaptive optimizers, in which the learning rates are modified adaptively during the training process, do converge in the situation of non-vanishing learning rates. In this work we answer this question negatively by proving that adaptive SGD methods such as the popular Adam optimizer fail to converge to any possible random limit point if the learning rates are asymptotically bounded away from zero. In our proof of this non-convergence result we establish suitable pathwise a priori bounds for a class of accelerated and adaptive SGD methods, which are also of independent interest.
Read more7/12/2024
🔗
0
Convergence Analysis of Adaptive Gradient Methods under Refined Smoothness and Noise Assumptions
Devyani Maladkar, Ruichen Jiang, Aryan Mokhtari
Adaptive gradient methods are arguably the most successful optimization algorithms for neural network training. While it is well-known that adaptive gradient methods can achieve better dimensional dependence than stochastic gradient descent (SGD) under favorable geometry for stochastic convex optimization, the theoretical justification for their success in stochastic non-convex optimization remains elusive. In this paper, we aim to close this gap by analyzing the convergence rates of AdaGrad measured by the $ell_1$-norm of the gradient. Specifically, when the objective has $L$-Lipschitz gradient and the stochastic gradient variance is bounded by $sigma^2$, we prove a worst-case convergence rate of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(frac{sqrt{d}L}{sqrt{T}} + frac{sqrt{d} sigma}{T^{1/4}})$, where $d$ is the dimension of the problem.We also present a lower bound of ${Omega}(frac{sqrt{d}}{sqrt{T}})$ for minimizing the gradient $ell_1$-norm in the deterministic setting, showing the tightness of our upper bound in the noiseless case. Moreover, under more fine-grained assumptions on the smoothness structure of the objective and the gradient noise and under favorable gradient $ell_1/ell_2$ geometry, we show that AdaGrad can potentially shave a factor of $sqrt{d}$ compared to SGD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result for adaptive gradient methods that demonstrates a provable gain over SGD in the non-convex setting.
Read more6/10/2024