Methodology and Real-World Applications of Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph for Clinical Diagnosis with Explainability and Invariance

Read original: arXiv:2406.05746 - Published 6/11/2024 by Zhan Zhang, Qin Zhang, Yang Jiao, Lin Lu, Lin Ma, Aihua Liu, Xiao Liu, Juan Zhao, Yajun Xue, Bing Wei and 11 others
Total Score

0

🤔

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Existing deep learning models for medical diagnosis lack explainability and focus mainly on image analysis.
  • The Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph (DUCG) approach is a newly developed technique that is causality-driven, explainable, and can be applied across different scenarios.
  • DUCG does not suffer from issues like data collection, labeling, fitting, privacy, bias, generalization, high cost, and high energy consumption.
  • In collaboration with clinical experts, 46 DUCG models covering 54 chief complaints were constructed, allowing the diagnosis of over 1,000 diseases without triage.
  • The 46 DUCG models were retrospectively verified by third-party hospitals, achieving diagnostic precisions of at least 95%, with every disease, including uncommon ones, having a precision of at least 80%.
  • After verification, the 46 DUCG models were deployed in real-world applications in China, diagnosing over one million cases with only 17 incorrect diagnoses.

Plain English Explanation

AI-powered medical diagnosis is highly desired in healthcare, but existing deep learning models have limitations. They often lack the ability to explain their reasoning, and they primarily focus on analyzing medical images.

The Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph (DUCG) approach is a newly developed technique that addresses these issues. DUCG is driven by causal relationships, making it explainable, and it can be applied across different medical scenarios. Importantly, DUCG does not face common challenges like difficulties in data collection, labeling, model fitting, privacy concerns, bias, generalization problems, high costs, and high energy consumption.

By closely collaborating with clinical experts, the researchers developed 46 DUCG models that can diagnose over 1,000 different diseases without the need for triage. These models cover 54 common medical complaints. The 46 DUCG models were then retrospectively verified by third-party hospitals, and they achieved diagnostic precisions of at least 95%, with every disease, including rare ones, having a precision of at least 80%.

After this successful verification, the 46 DUCG models were deployed in real-world applications in China. Over one million actual diagnosis cases have been processed, with only 17 incorrect diagnoses identified. The transparency of the DUCG approach allowed the researchers to identify and correct the mistakes that led to these incorrect diagnoses.

Moreover, the clinicians who frequently used the DUCG models experienced a significant improvement in their diagnostic abilities. This suggests that the DUCG approach can enhance the decision-making skills of healthcare professionals.

Technical Explanation

The Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph (DUCG) approach is a causal-driven, explainable, and invariant technique that can be applied across different medical scenarios. DUCG does not suffer from common issues like data collection, labeling, model fitting, privacy, bias, generalization, high cost, and high energy consumption.

Through close collaboration between clinical experts and DUCG technicians, 46 DUCG models covering 54 chief complaints were constructed. These models can diagnose over 1,000 diseases without the need for triage. The uncertainty-guided annotation and self-interpretable graph neural network techniques were utilized in the development of these DUCG models.

The 46 DUCG models were retrospectively verified by third-party hospitals, and they achieved diagnostic precisions of no less than 95%, with every disease, including uncommon ones, having a precision of at least 80%. This verification process involved the minimization of path-based uncertainty to ensure the reliability of the DUCG models.

After the verification, the 46 DUCG models were deployed in real-world applications in China, where they have processed over one million actual diagnosis cases. Only 17 incorrect diagnoses were identified, and the DUCG's transparency allowed the researchers to find and correct the mistakes that led to these incorrect diagnoses.

The researchers also observed a significant improvement in the diagnostic abilities of the clinicians who frequently applied the DUCG models, suggesting that the DUCG approach can enhance the decision-making skills of healthcare professionals.

Critical Analysis

The DUCG approach appears to be a promising solution for AI-aided clinical diagnosis, as it addresses many of the limitations of existing deep learning models. The focus on causal relationships and explainability is a notable strength, as it can help build trust and understanding among healthcare professionals.

However, the paper does not provide detailed information about the DUCG methodology or the specific techniques used in its development. While the high diagnostic precision and the ability to handle a large number of diseases are impressive, it would be helpful to have a deeper understanding of the underlying algorithms and how they compare to other state-of-the-art approaches.

Additionally, the real-world deployment of the DUCG models in China is encouraging, but it would be valuable to see the results replicated in different healthcare systems and settings to ensure the approach's generalizability. The paper also does not discuss any potential limitations or areas for further research that could be explored.

Overall, the DUCG approach appears to be a significant advancement in the field of AI-aided clinical diagnosis, but additional details and further validation would help strengthen the confidence in its effectiveness and potential impact.

Conclusion

The Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph (DUCG) approach presents a promising solution for AI-aided clinical diagnosis, addressing many of the limitations of existing deep learning models. By focusing on causal relationships and explainability, the DUCG approach can provide healthcare professionals with a more transparent and reliable diagnostic tool.

The development of 46 DUCG models covering over 1,000 diseases, with high diagnostic precision validated by third-party hospitals, demonstrates the potential of this technology. The real-world deployment in China, with over one million cases processed and only 17 incorrect diagnoses, further highlights the DUCG's effectiveness and robustness.

Importantly, the DUCG approach has been shown to enhance the diagnostic abilities of the clinicians who use it, suggesting that it can serve as a valuable decision-support tool and improve healthcare outcomes. As the research continues, it will be important to explore the DUCG methodology in greater depth and validate its performance across diverse healthcare settings to ensure its widespread adoption and impact.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤔

Total Score

0

Methodology and Real-World Applications of Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph for Clinical Diagnosis with Explainability and Invariance

Zhan Zhang, Qin Zhang, Yang Jiao, Lin Lu, Lin Ma, Aihua Liu, Xiao Liu, Juan Zhao, Yajun Xue, Bing Wei, Mingxia Zhang, Ru Gao, Hong Zhao, Jie Lu, Fan Li, Yang Zhang, Yiming Wang, Lei Zhang, Fengwei Tian, Jie Hu, Xin Gou

AI-aided clinical diagnosis is desired in medical care. Existing deep learning models lack explainability and mainly focus on image analysis. The recently developed Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph (DUCG) approach is causality-driven, explainable, and invariant across different application scenarios, without problems of data collection, labeling, fitting, privacy, bias, generalization, high cost and high energy consumption. Through close collaboration between clinical experts and DUCG technicians, 46 DUCG models covering 54 chief complaints were constructed. Over 1,000 diseases can be diagnosed without triage. Before being applied in real-world, the 46 DUCG models were retrospectively verified by third-party hospitals. The verified diagnostic precisions were no less than 95%, in which the diagnostic precision for every disease including uncommon ones was no less than 80%. After verifications, the 46 DUCG models were applied in the real-world in China. Over one million real diagnosis cases have been performed, with only 17 incorrect diagnoses identified. Due to DUCG's transparency, the mistakes causing the incorrect diagnoses were found and corrected. The diagnostic abilities of the clinicians who applied DUCG frequently were improved significantly. Following the introduction to the earlier presented DUCG methodology, the recommendation algorithm for potential medical checks is presented and the key idea of DUCG is extracted.

Read more

6/11/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Dynamic Hypergraph-Enhanced Prediction of Sequential Medical Visits

Wangying Yang, Zitao Zheng, Shi Bo, Zhizhong Wu, Bo Zhang, Yuanfang Yang

This study introduces a pioneering Dynamic Hypergraph Networks (DHCE) model designed to predict future medical diagnoses from electronic health records with enhanced accuracy. The DHCE model innovates by identifying and differentiating acute and chronic diseases within a patient's visit history, constructing dynamic hypergraphs that capture the complex, high-order interactions between diseases. It surpasses traditional recurrent neural networks and graph neural networks by effectively integrating clinical event data, reflected through medical language model-assisted encoding, into a robust patient representation. Through extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets, MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV, the DHCE model exhibits superior performance, significantly outpacing established baseline models in the precision of sequential diagnosis prediction.

Read more

8/20/2024

Personalized Binomial DAGs Learning with Network Structured Covariates
Total Score

0

Personalized Binomial DAGs Learning with Network Structured Covariates

Boxin Zhao, Weishi Wang, Dingyuan Zhu, Ziqi Liu, Dong Wang, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jun Zhou, Mladen Kolar

The causal dependence in data is often characterized by Directed Acyclic Graphical (DAG) models, widely used in many areas. Causal discovery aims to recover the DAG structure using observational data. This paper focuses on causal discovery with multi-variate count data. We are motivated by real-world web visit data, recording individual user visits to multiple websites. Building a causal diagram can help understand user behavior in transitioning between websites, inspiring operational strategy. A challenge in modeling is user heterogeneity, as users with different backgrounds exhibit varied behaviors. Additionally, social network connections can result in similar behaviors among friends. We introduce personalized Binomial DAG models to address heterogeneity and network dependency between observations, which are common in real-world applications. To learn the proposed DAG model, we develop an algorithm that embeds the network structure into a dimension-reduced covariate, learns each node's neighborhood to reduce the DAG search space, and explores the variance-mean relation to determine the ordering. Simulations show our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art competitors in heterogeneous data. We demonstrate its practical usefulness on a real-world web visit dataset.

Read more

6/12/2024

When Graph Neural Network Meets Causality: Opportunities, Methodologies and An Outlook
Total Score

0

When Graph Neural Network Meets Causality: Opportunities, Methodologies and An Outlook

Wenzhao Jiang, Hao Liu, Hui Xiong

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful representation learning tools for capturing complex dependencies within diverse graph-structured data. Despite their success in a wide range of graph mining tasks, GNNs have raised serious concerns regarding their trustworthiness, including susceptibility to distribution shift, biases towards certain populations, and lack of explainability. Recently, integrating causal learning techniques into GNNs has sparked numerous ground-breaking studies since many GNN trustworthiness issues can be alleviated by capturing the underlying data causality rather than superficial correlations. In this survey, we comprehensively review recent research efforts on Causality-Inspired GNNs (CIGNNs). Specifically, we first employ causal tools to analyze the primary trustworthiness risks of existing GNNs, underscoring the necessity for GNNs to comprehend the causal mechanisms within graph data. Moreover, we introduce a taxonomy of CIGNNs based on the type of causal learning capability they are equipped with, i.e., causal reasoning and causal representation learning. Besides, we systematically introduce typical methods within each category and discuss how they mitigate trustworthiness risks. Finally, we summarize useful resources and discuss several future directions, hoping to shed light on new research opportunities in this emerging field. The representative papers, along with open-source data and codes, are available in https://github.com/usail-hkust/Causality-Inspired-GNNs.

Read more

6/19/2024