Minimax-Optimal Reward-Agnostic Exploration in Reinforcement Learning
2304.07278
0
0
🏅
Abstract
This paper studies reward-agnostic exploration in reinforcement learning (RL) -- a scenario where the learner is unware of the reward functions during the exploration stage -- and designs an algorithm that improves over the state of the art. More precisely, consider a finite-horizon inhomogeneous Markov decision process with $S$ states, $A$ actions, and horizon length $H$, and suppose that there are no more than a polynomial number of given reward functions of interest. By collecting an order of begin{align*} frac{SAH^3}{varepsilon^2} text{ sample episodes (up to log factor)} end{align*} without guidance of the reward information, our algorithm is able to find $varepsilon$-optimal policies for all these reward functions, provided that $varepsilon$ is sufficiently small. This forms the first reward-agnostic exploration scheme in this context that achieves provable minimax optimality. Furthermore, once the sample size exceeds $frac{S^2AH^3}{varepsilon^2}$ episodes (up to log factor), our algorithm is able to yield $varepsilon$ accuracy for arbitrarily many reward functions (even when they are adversarially designed), a task commonly dubbed as ``reward-free exploration.'' The novelty of our algorithm design draws on insights from offline RL: the exploration scheme attempts to maximize a critical reward-agnostic quantity that dictates the performance of offline RL, while the policy learning paradigm leverages ideas from sample-optimal offline RL paradigms.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a scenario in reinforcement learning (RL) where the learner is unaware of the reward functions during the exploration stage.
- The authors design an algorithm that improves over the state of the art in this "reward-agnostic exploration" setting.
- The algorithm is able to find near-optimal policies for a polynomial number of reward functions using a relatively small number of sample episodes.
- Once the sample size exceeds a certain threshold, the algorithm can also achieve near-optimal performance for an arbitrary number of reward functions, even adversarially designed ones.
- The novelty of the algorithm comes from insights drawn from offline RL techniques.
Plain English Explanation
In reinforcement learning, the agent typically learns by interacting with an environment and receiving rewards that guide its behavior. However, in some scenarios, the agent may need to explore the environment without knowing the specific reward functions in advance. This is known as "reward-agnostic exploration."
The authors of this paper have developed an algorithm that can effectively explore the environment and learn near-optimal policies for a large number of potential reward functions, even without knowing what those rewards are during the exploration stage.
The key idea is to have the agent focus on maximizing a critical "reward-agnostic" quantity that dictates the performance of offline RL (where the agent learns from pre-collected data without interacting with the environment). By doing so, the agent can gather valuable information about the environment that allows it to quickly adapt to a wide range of reward functions, even if they are adversarially designed.
This approach represents a significant advancement over previous methods, as it achieves provable minimax optimality – meaning the algorithm performs as well as the best possible algorithm for this type of problem, regardless of the specific reward functions involved.
Technical Explanation
The paper considers a finite-horizon Markov decision process (MDP) with a finite number of states and actions, and a finite horizon length. The authors assume there are no more than a polynomial number of given reward functions of interest.
By collecting a relatively small number of sample episodes (on the order of SAH^3/ε^2, where S is the number of states, A is the number of actions, H is the horizon length, and ε is the desired accuracy level), the authors' algorithm is able to find ε-optimal policies for all of these reward functions.
Furthermore, once the sample size exceeds S^2AH^3/ε^2 episodes, the algorithm can achieve ε accuracy for an arbitrary number of reward functions, even if they are adversarially designed. This task is commonly referred to as "reward-free exploration."
The key innovation in the algorithm design is the use of insights from offline RL. Specifically, the exploration scheme attempts to maximize a critical reward-agnostic quantity that dictates the performance of offline RL, while the policy learning paradigm leverages ideas from sample-optimal offline RL algorithms.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a significant advancement in the field of reward-agnostic exploration in reinforcement learning. The authors' algorithm achieves provable minimax optimality, which is a strong theoretical guarantee.
However, the paper does not address the practical challenges of implementing this algorithm in real-world scenarios. The assumptions, such as a finite horizon and a polynomial number of reward functions, may not always hold in complex, open-ended environments.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential computational and memory requirements of the algorithm, which could be a limiting factor in some applications.
Further research could explore extensions of this work to more general settings, such as continuous state and action spaces, or environments with unknown dynamics. Empirical evaluations on realistic benchmark tasks would also help assess the algorithm's practical feasibility and performance.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel algorithm for reward-agnostic exploration in reinforcement learning that significantly advances the state of the art. By leveraging insights from offline RL, the algorithm is able to efficiently explore the environment and learn near-optimal policies for a wide range of potential reward functions, even without knowing the specific rewards in advance.
The theoretical guarantees and the core ideas behind the algorithm design are important contributions to the field of reinforcement learning. While the practical application of this work may face some challenges, the paper opens up new avenues for further research and development in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Uncertainty-Aware Reward-Free Exploration with General Function Approximation
Junkai Zhang, Weitong Zhang, Dongruo Zhou, Quanquan Gu
0
0
Mastering multiple tasks through exploration and learning in an environment poses a significant challenge in reinforcement learning (RL). Unsupervised RL has been introduced to address this challenge by training policies with intrinsic rewards rather than extrinsic rewards. However, current intrinsic reward designs and unsupervised RL algorithms often overlook the heterogeneous nature of collected samples, thereby diminishing their sample efficiency. To overcome this limitation, in this paper, we propose a reward-free RL algorithm called alg. The key idea behind our algorithm is an uncertainty-aware intrinsic reward for exploring the environment and an uncertainty-weighted learning process to handle heterogeneous uncertainty in different samples. Theoretically, we show that in order to find an $epsilon$-optimal policy, GFA-RFE needs to collect $tilde{O} (H^2 log N_{mathcal F} (epsilon) mathrm{dim} (mathcal F) / epsilon^2 )$ number of episodes, where $mathcal F$ is the value function class with covering number $N_{mathcal F} (epsilon)$ and generalized eluder dimension $mathrm{dim} (mathcal F)$. Such a result outperforms all existing reward-free RL algorithms. We further implement and evaluate GFA-RFE across various domains and tasks in the DeepMind Control Suite. Experiment results show that GFA-RFE outperforms or is comparable to the performance of state-of-the-art unsupervised RL algorithms.
6/26/2024
Beyond Optimism: Exploration With Partially Observable Rewards
Simone Parisi, Alireza Kazemipour, Michael Bowling
0
0
Exploration in reinforcement learning (RL) remains an open challenge. RL algorithms rely on observing rewards to train the agent, and if informative rewards are sparse the agent learns slowly or may not learn at all. To improve exploration and reward discovery, popular algorithms rely on optimism. But what if sometimes rewards are unobservable, e.g., situations of partial monitoring in bandits and the recent formalism of monitored Markov decision process? In this case, optimism can lead to suboptimal behavior that does not explore further to collapse uncertainty. With this paper, we present a novel exploration strategy that overcomes the limitations of existing methods and guarantees convergence to an optimal policy even when rewards are not always observable. We further propose a collection of tabular environments for benchmarking exploration in RL (with and without unobservable rewards) and show that our method outperforms existing ones.
6/21/2024
👀
Intrinsic Rewards for Exploration without Harm from Observational Noise: A Simulation Study Based on the Free Energy Principle
Theodore Jerome Tinker, Kenji Doya, Jun Tani
0
0
In Reinforcement Learning (RL), artificial agents are trained to maximize numerical rewards by performing tasks. Exploration is essential in RL because agents must discover information before exploiting it. Two rewards encouraging efficient exploration are the entropy of action policy and curiosity for information gain. Entropy is well-established in literature, promoting randomized action selection. Curiosity is defined in a broad variety of ways in literature, promoting discovery of novel experiences. One example, prediction error curiosity, rewards agents for discovering observations they cannot accurately predict. However, such agents may be distracted by unpredictable observational noises known as curiosity traps. Based on the Free Energy Principle (FEP), this paper proposes hidden state curiosity, which rewards agents by the KL divergence between the predictive prior and posterior probabilities of latent variables. We trained six types of agents to navigate mazes: baseline agents without rewards for entropy or curiosity, and agents rewarded for entropy and/or either prediction error curiosity or hidden state curiosity. We find entropy and curiosity result in efficient exploration, especially both employed together. Notably, agents with hidden state curiosity demonstrate resilience against curiosity traps, which hinder agents with prediction error curiosity. This suggests implementing the FEP may enhance the robustness and generalization of RL models, potentially aligning the learning processes of artificial and biological agents.
5/14/2024
🏅
Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Average Reward Objective: Model-Based and Model-Free Algorithms
Vaneet Aggarwal, Washim Uddin Mondal, Qinbo Bai
0
0
Reinforcement Learning (RL) serves as a versatile framework for sequential decision-making, finding applications across diverse domains such as robotics, autonomous driving, recommendation systems, supply chain optimization, biology, mechanics, and finance. The primary objective in these applications is to maximize the average reward. Real-world scenarios often necessitate adherence to specific constraints during the learning process. This monograph focuses on the exploration of various model-based and model-free approaches for Constrained RL within the context of average reward Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). The investigation commences with an examination of model-based strategies, delving into two foundational methods - optimism in the face of uncertainty and posterior sampling. Subsequently, the discussion transitions to parametrized model-free approaches, where the primal-dual policy gradient-based algorithm is explored as a solution for constrained MDPs. The monograph provides regret guarantees and analyzes constraint violation for each of the discussed setups. For the above exploration, we assume the underlying MDP to be ergodic. Further, this monograph extends its discussion to encompass results tailored for weakly communicating MDPs, thereby broadening the scope of its findings and their relevance to a wider range of practical scenarios.
6/24/2024