On Missing Scores in Evolving Multibiometric Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the problem of missing biometric scores in evolving multibiometric systems
- Proposes techniques to handle missing scores and maintain system performance
- Investigates the impact of different missing score imputation methods
Plain English Explanation
Biometric systems, such as those used for identification or authentication, often rely on collecting and analyzing multiple biological characteristics (e.g., fingerprints, facial features, iris patterns) to improve accuracy. However, in real-world scenarios, some of these biometric samples may be missing or unavailable. This can happen for various reasons, such as sensor failures, user cooperation issues, or changing biometric data over time as the system evolves.
The research paper explores techniques to address this challenge of missing biometric scores in multibiometric systems. It evaluates different methods for imputing or estimating the missing scores, and examines the impact of these methods on the overall system performance. By developing effective strategies to handle missing data, the researchers aim to improve the reliability and robustness of evolving multibiometric systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes and evaluates several approaches for dealing with missing biometric scores in a multibiometric system. These include:
- Score normalization techniques to ensure the compatibility of scores from different biometric modalities.
- Imputation methods to estimate the missing scores, such as using the sample mean or median of available scores.
- Fusion strategies that can accommodate missing data, such as score-level fusion with missing data handling.
The researchers evaluate the performance of the proposed techniques on a multibiometric dataset with simulated missing scores. They analyze the impact of different missing score imputation methods on various performance metrics, including authentication accuracy, verification rate, and false acceptance rate.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive study of the challenges posed by missing biometric scores in evolving multibiometric systems. The authors acknowledge that in real-world applications, missing data is unavoidable, and they explore practical solutions to maintain system performance in the face of this challenge.
One potential limitation of the research is that the evaluation is based on simulated missing data, rather than real-world datasets with naturally occurring missing scores. The authors mention this as a future research direction, noting the need to further validate the proposed techniques on more diverse and realistic datasets.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the impact of demographic factors on the performance of the missing score imputation methods. This could be an important consideration, as biometric systems should strive for fairness and avoid demographic biases.
Conclusion
This research paper addresses a critical issue in the development of robust and reliable multibiometric systems: the challenge of missing biometric scores. The proposed techniques for score normalization, imputation, and fusion demonstrate the potential to maintain system performance even in the presence of missing data. By exploring effective strategies to handle this common real-world problem, the researchers contribute to the advancement of multibiometric technologies and their practical deployments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
On Missing Scores in Evolving Multibiometric Systems
Melissa R Dale, Anil Jain, Arun Ross
The use of multiple modalities (e.g., face and fingerprint) or multiple algorithms (e.g., three face comparators) has shown to improve the recognition accuracy of an operational biometric system. Over time a biometric system may evolve to add new modalities, retire old modalities, or be merged with other biometric systems. This can lead to scenarios where there are missing scores corresponding to the input probe set. Previous work on this topic has focused on either the verification or identification tasks, but not both. Further, the proportion of missing data considered has been less than 50%. In this work, we study the impact of missing score data for both the verification and identification tasks. We show that the application of various score imputation methods along with simple sum fusion can improve recognition accuracy, even when the proportion of missing scores increases to 90%. Experiments show that fusion after score imputation outperforms fusion with no imputation. Specifically, iterative imputation with K nearest neighbors consistently surpasses other imputation methods in both the verification and identification tasks, regardless of the amount of scores missing, and provides imputed values that are consistent with the ground truth complete dataset.
Read more8/22/2024
0
To Impute or Not: Recommendations for Multibiometric Fusion
Melissa R Dale, Elliot Singer, Bengt J. Borgstrom, Arun Ross
Combining match scores from different biometric systems via fusion is a well-established approach to improving recognition accuracy. However, missing scores can degrade performance as well as limit the possible fusion techniques that can be applied. Imputation is a promising technique in multibiometric systems for replacing missing data. In this paper, we evaluate various score imputation approaches on three multimodal biometric score datasets, viz. NIST BSSR1, BIOCOP2008, and MIT LL Trimodal, and investigate the factors which might influence the effectiveness of imputation. Our studies reveal three key observations: (1) Imputation is preferable over not imputing missing scores, even when the fusion rule does not require complete score data. (2) Balancing the classes in the training data is crucial to mitigate negative biases in the imputation technique towards the under-represented class, even if it involves dropping a substantial number of score vectors. (3) Multivariate imputation approaches seem to be beneficial when scores between modalities are correlated, while univariate approaches seem to benefit scenarios where scores between modalities are less correlated.
Read more8/16/2024
0
Open-Set Biometrics: Beyond Good Closed-Set Models
Yiyang Su, Minchul Kim, Feng Liu, Anil Jain, Xiaoming Liu
Biometric recognition has primarily addressed closed-set identification, assuming all probe subjects are in the gallery. However, most practical applications involve open-set biometrics, where probe subjects may or may not be present in the gallery. This poses distinct challenges in effectively distinguishing individuals in the gallery while minimizing false detections. While it is commonly believed that powerful biometric models can excel in both closed- and open-set scenarios, existing loss functions are inconsistent with open-set evaluation. They treat genuine (mated) and imposter (non-mated) similarity scores symmetrically and neglect the relative magnitudes of imposter scores. To address these issues, we simulate open-set evaluation using minibatches during training and introduce novel loss functions: (1) the identification-detection loss optimized for open-set performance under selective thresholds and (2) relative threshold minimization to reduce the maximum negative score for each probe. Across diverse biometric tasks, including face recognition, gait recognition, and person re-identification, our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed loss functions, significantly enhancing open-set performance while positively impacting closed-set performance. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/prevso1088/open-set-biometrics.
Read more7/24/2024
0
Long-Range Biometric Identification in Real World Scenarios: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework Based on Missions
Deniz Aykac, Joel Brogan, Nell Barber, Ryan Shivers, Bob Zhang, Dallas Sacca, Ryan Tipton, Gavin Jager, Austin Garret, Matthew Love, Jim Goddard, David Cornett III, David S. Bolme
The considerable body of data available for evaluating biometric recognition systems in Research and Development (R&D) environments has contributed to the increasingly common problem of target performance mismatch. Biometric algorithms are frequently tested against data that may not reflect the real world applications they target. From a Testing and Evaluation (T&E) standpoint, this domain mismatch causes difficulty assessing when improvements in State-of-the-Art (SOTA) research actually translate to improved applied outcomes. This problem can be addressed with thoughtful preparation of data and experimental methods to reflect specific use-cases and scenarios. To that end, this paper evaluates research solutions for identifying individuals at ranges and altitudes, which could support various application areas such as counterterrorism, protection of critical infrastructure facilities, military force protection, and border security. We address challenges including image quality issues and reliance on face recognition as the sole biometric modality. By fusing face and body features, we propose developing robust biometric systems for effective long-range identification from both the ground and steep pitch angles. Preliminary results show promising progress in whole-body recognition. This paper presents these early findings and discusses potential future directions for advancing long-range biometric identification systems based on mission-driven metrics.
Read more9/4/2024