MIST: Defending Against Membership Inference Attacks Through Membership-Invariant Subspace Training
2311.00919
0
0
🤯
Abstract
In Member Inference (MI) attacks, the adversary try to determine whether an instance is used to train a machine learning (ML) model. MI attacks are a major privacy concern when using private data to train ML models. Most MI attacks in the literature take advantage of the fact that ML models are trained to fit the training data well, and thus have very low loss on training instances. Most defenses against MI attacks therefore try to make the model fit the training data less well. Doing so, however, generally results in lower accuracy. We observe that training instances have different degrees of vulnerability to MI attacks. Most instances will have low loss even when not included in training. For these instances, the model can fit them well without concerns of MI attacks. An effective defense only needs to (possibly implicitly) identify instances that are vulnerable to MI attacks and avoids overfitting them. A major challenge is how to achieve such an effect in an efficient training process. Leveraging two distinct recent advancements in representation learning: counterfactually-invariant representations and subspace learning methods, we introduce a novel Membership-Invariant Subspace Training (MIST) method to defend against MI attacks. MIST avoids overfitting the vulnerable instances without significant impact on other instances. We have conducted extensive experimental studies, comparing MIST with various other state-of-the-art (SOTA) MI defenses against several SOTA MI attacks. We find that MIST outperforms other defenses while resulting in minimal reduction in testing accuracy.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- In this paper, the authors introduce a novel method called Membership-Invariant Subspace Training (MIST) to defend against Member Inference (MI) attacks on machine learning (ML) models.
- MI attacks are a major privacy concern when using private data to train ML models, as they aim to determine whether an instance was used to train a specific model.
- Most existing defenses against MI attacks try to make the model fit the training data less well, which can result in lower accuracy.
- The authors observe that training instances have different degrees of vulnerability to MI attacks, and an effective defense only needs to identify and avoid overfitting the vulnerable instances.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a problem called Member Inference (MI) attacks, where an adversary tries to determine whether a specific data instance was used to train a machine learning (ML) model. This is a major privacy concern when using private data to train ML models.
Most current defenses against MI attacks try to make the model fit the training data less well, which can lead to lower accuracy. However, the authors observe that not all training instances are equally vulnerable to MI attacks. Some instances can be fit well by the model without concerns of MI attacks, while others are more vulnerable.
The authors introduce a new method called Membership-Invariant Subspace Training (MIST) that aims to identify and avoid overfitting the vulnerable instances, while still allowing the model to fit the less vulnerable instances well. This is achieved by leveraging [object Object] and [object Object].
The authors conduct extensive experiments, comparing MIST to other state-of-the-art MI defenses and attacks. They find that MIST outperforms other defenses while resulting in minimal reduction in testing accuracy.
Technical Explanation
The key idea behind the Membership-Invariant Subspace Training (MIST) method is to avoid overfitting the vulnerable training instances without significantly impacting the model's performance on other instances.
The authors observe that not all training instances are equally vulnerable to MI attacks. Some instances can be fitted well by the model without concerns of MI attacks, while others are more vulnerable. An effective defense only needs to (possibly implicitly) identify and avoid overfitting the vulnerable instances.
To achieve this, the authors leverage two distinct recent advancements in representation learning: [object Object] and [object Object]. These techniques allow the model to learn a subspace that captures the relevant features for the task while being invariant to membership information.
The authors compare MIST to various other state-of-the-art (SOTA) MI defenses, such as [object Object] and [object Object], as well as several SOTA MI attacks, using the [object Object] MI defenses. Their results show that MIST outperforms other defenses while resulting in minimal reduction in testing accuracy.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough evaluation of their MIST method, comparing it to various other state-of-the-art defenses against MI attacks. However, the paper does not discuss any potential limitations or caveats of the MIST approach.
One area of concern is the generalizability of the method. The authors evaluate MIST on a limited set of datasets and tasks, and it's unclear whether the method would be equally effective in different domains or with larger, more complex models.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the computational efficiency of the MIST training process. If the method is significantly more computationally intensive than other defenses, it may not be practical for real-world deployment.
Further research could also investigate the robustness of the MIST-defended models against more advanced MI attacks that may be able to circumvent the defense. The authors mention this as a potential area for future work, but do not provide any insights into how the method might fare against such attacks.
Conclusion
The Membership-Invariant Subspace Training (MIST) method introduced in this paper is a promising approach to defending against Member Inference (MI) attacks on machine learning models. By leveraging advancements in representation learning, MIST is able to avoid overfitting the vulnerable training instances without significantly impacting the model's performance on other instances.
The authors' extensive experiments show that MIST outperforms other state-of-the-art MI defenses while maintaining minimal reduction in testing accuracy. This suggests that MIST could be a valuable tool for practitioners who need to train ML models on sensitive or private data while preserving the privacy of their training data.
However, the paper does not address potential limitations, such as the generalizability of the method or its computational efficiency. Further research is needed to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of MIST, as well as its robustness against more advanced MI attacks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
Fundamental Limits of Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning Models
Eric Aubinais, Elisabeth Gassiat, Pablo Piantanida
0
0
Membership inference attacks (MIA) can reveal whether a particular data point was part of the training dataset, potentially exposing sensitive information about individuals. This article provides theoretical guarantees by exploring the fundamental statistical limitations associated with MIAs on machine learning models. More precisely, we first derive the statistical quantity that governs the effectiveness and success of such attacks. We then theoretically prove that in a non-linear regression setting with overfitting algorithms, attacks may have a high probability of success. Finally, we investigate several situations for which we provide bounds on this quantity of interest. Interestingly, our findings indicate that discretizing the data might enhance the algorithm's security. Specifically, it is demonstrated to be limited by a constant, which quantifies the diversity of the underlying data distribution. We illustrate those results through two simple simulations.
6/12/2024
Confidence Is All You Need for MI Attacks
Abhishek Sinha, Himanshi Tibrewal, Mansi Gupta, Nikhar Waghela, Shivank Garg
0
0
In this evolving era of machine learning security, membership inference attacks have emerged as a potent threat to the confidentiality of sensitive data. In this attack, adversaries aim to determine whether a particular point was used during the training of a target model. This paper proposes a new method to gauge a data point's membership in a model's training set. Instead of correlating loss with membership, as is traditionally done, we have leveraged the fact that training examples generally exhibit higher confidence values when classified into their actual class. During training, the model is essentially being 'fit' to the training data and might face particular difficulties in generalization to unseen data. This asymmetry leads to the model achieving higher confidence on the training data as it exploits the specific patterns and noise present in the training data. Our proposed approach leverages the confidence values generated by the machine learning model. These confidence values provide a probabilistic measure of the model's certainty in its predictions and can further be used to infer the membership of a given data point. Additionally, we also introduce another variant of our method that allows us to carry out this attack without knowing the ground truth(true class) of a given data point, thus offering an edge over existing label-dependent attack methods.
6/21/2024
🤯
Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference Attacks
Sajjad Zarifzadeh, Philippe Liu, Reza Shokri
0
0
Membership inference attacks aim to detect if a particular data point was used in training a model. We design a novel statistical test to perform robust membership inference attacks (RMIA) with low computational overhead. We achieve this by a fine-grained modeling of the null hypothesis in our likelihood ratio tests, and effectively leveraging both reference models and reference population data samples. RMIA has superior test power compared with prior methods, throughout the TPR-FPR curve (even at extremely low FPR, as low as 0). Under computational constraints, where only a limited number of pre-trained reference models (as few as 1) are available, and also when we vary other elements of the attack (e.g., data distribution), our method performs exceptionally well, unlike prior attacks that approach random guessing. RMIA lays the groundwork for practical yet accurate data privacy risk assessment in machine learning.
6/13/2024
Towards a Game-theoretic Understanding of Explanation-based Membership Inference Attacks
Kavita Kumari, Murtuza Jadliwala, Sumit Kumar Jha, Anindya Maiti
0
0
Model explanations improve the transparency of black-box machine learning (ML) models and their decisions; however, they can also be exploited to carry out privacy threats such as membership inference attacks (MIA). Existing works have only analyzed MIA in a single what if interaction scenario between an adversary and the target ML model; thus, it does not discern the factors impacting the capabilities of an adversary in launching MIA in repeated interaction settings. Additionally, these works rely on assumptions about the adversary's knowledge of the target model's structure and, thus, do not guarantee the optimality of the predefined threshold required to distinguish the members from non-members. In this paper, we delve into the domain of explanation-based threshold attacks, where the adversary endeavors to carry out MIA attacks by leveraging the variance of explanations through iterative interactions with the system comprising of the target ML model and its corresponding explanation method. We model such interactions by employing a continuous-time stochastic signaling game framework. In our framework, an adversary plays a stopping game, interacting with the system (having imperfect information about the type of an adversary, i.e., honest or malicious) to obtain explanation variance information and computing an optimal threshold to determine the membership of a datapoint accurately. First, we propose a sound mathematical formulation to prove that such an optimal threshold exists, which can be used to launch MIA. Then, we characterize the conditions under which a unique Markov perfect equilibrium (or steady state) exists in this dynamic system. By means of a comprehensive set of simulations of the proposed game model, we assess different factors that can impact the capability of an adversary to launch MIA in such repeated interaction settings.
4/11/2024