Mitigating federated learning contribution allocation instability through randomized aggregation
2405.08044
0
0
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) is a novel collaborative machine learning framework designed to preserve privacy while enabling the creation of robust models. This paradigm addresses a growing need for data security by allowing multiple participants to contribute to a model without exposing their individual datasets. A pivotal issue within this framework, however, concerns the fair and accurate attribution of contributions from various participants to the creation of the joint global model. Incorrect contribution distribution can erode trust among participants, result in inequitable compensation, and ultimately diminish the willingness of parties to engage or actively contribute to the federation. While several methods for remunerating participants have been proposed, little attention was given to the analysis of the stability of these methods when evaluating contributions, which is critical to ensure the long-term viability and fairness of FL systems. In this paper, we analyse this stability through the calculation of contributions by gradient-based model reconstruction techniques with Shapley values. Our investigation reveals that Shapley values fail to reflect baseline contributions, especially when employing different aggregation techniques. To address this issue, we extend on established aggregation techniques by introducing FedRandom, which is designed to sample contributions in a more equitable and distributed manner. We demonstrate that this approach not only serves as a viable aggregation technique but also significantly improves the accuracy of contribution assessment compared to traditional methods. Our results suggest that FedRandom enhances the overall fairness and stability of the federated learning system, making it a superior choice for federations with limited number of participants.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a method to mitigate the instability in how federated learning systems allocate credit to individual participants.
- Federated learning allows multiple devices to collaboratively train a shared model without sharing their raw data. However, existing methods for aggregating model updates can lead to unfairness and instability in how much each participant's contribution is valued.
- The authors introduce a new randomized aggregation approach that aims to make the contribution allocation more stable and fair across participants.
Plain English Explanation
Federated learning is a way for different devices, like phones or computers, to work together to train a single machine learning model without sharing their private data. This is useful because it allows the model to be improved without compromising people's privacy.
However, the current methods used to combine the model updates from all the different devices can sometimes be unfair. Certain devices might end up contributing much more to the final model than others, even if they all put in similar amounts of work. This "instability" in how much credit each device gets can be a problem.
The researchers in this paper propose a new approach that uses randomization to make the contribution allocation more stable and fair. Their idea is to randomly select which device updates get included when combining the model, rather than always using all the updates. This helps ensure that no single device dominates the final model.
By making the contribution allocation more stable, this new randomized aggregation method could help federated learning systems be more equitable and reliable. The goal is to ensure that all the participating devices are appropriately rewarded for their efforts in training the shared model.
Technical Explanation
The core challenge addressed in this paper is the instability in how federated learning systems allocate credit to individual participants. Existing federated learning aggregation methods, such as federated averaging, can lead to unfairness where certain devices contribute disproportionately to the final model.
To mitigate this issue, the authors propose a new randomized aggregation approach. Rather than always incorporating all the model updates from participating devices, their method randomly selects a subset of the updates to include in the aggregation. This adds an element of stochasticity that helps prevent any single device from dominating the final model.
The authors evaluate their approach using both synthetic and real-world datasets, comparing it to standard federated averaging. Their results demonstrate that the randomized aggregation can indeed lead to more stable and fair allocation of credit across participants, without significantly impacting the model's performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful approach to addressing an important challenge in federated learning systems. The randomized aggregation technique seems promising as a way to improve fairness and stability in how individual participants' contributions are valued.
However, the authors acknowledge some limitations of their work. For example, they note that the optimal degree of randomization (i.e., the fraction of updates to include) may depend on the specific characteristics of the learning task and participant data. Further research would be needed to determine how to best adapt the randomization level in different scenarios.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the benefits of this approach on benchmark datasets, it would be valuable to see how it performs in real-world federated learning deployments with large numbers of diverse participants. The practical implications and potential pitfalls in such settings warrant further investigation.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution by introducing a novel technique to mitigate a significant issue in federated learning systems. The randomized aggregation concept is an interesting idea that deserves further exploration and refinement to realize its full potential.
Conclusion
This paper presents a new randomized aggregation method to address the problem of contribution allocation instability in federated learning. By randomly selecting which device updates to include in the aggregation process, the proposed approach helps ensure that no single participant dominates the final model.
The authors' experiments demonstrate that this technique can lead to more stable and fair credit allocation across participants, without substantially impacting the model's performance. While there are still some open questions and limitations to explore, this work represents an important step forward in making federated learning systems more equitable and reliable.
As federated learning continues to gain traction for privacy-preserving machine learning, addressing challenges like contribution instability will be crucial. The randomized aggregation method introduced in this paper offers a promising direction for improving the fairness and robustness of federated learning in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Redefining Contributions: Shapley-Driven Federated Learning
Nurbek Tastan, Samar Fares, Toluwani Aremu, Samuel Horvath, Karthik Nandakumar
0
0
Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a pivotal approach in machine learning, enabling multiple participants to collaboratively train a global model without sharing raw data. While FL finds applications in various domains such as healthcare and finance, it is challenging to ensure global model convergence when participants do not contribute equally and/or honestly. To overcome this challenge, principled mechanisms are required to evaluate the contributions made by individual participants in the FL setting. Existing solutions for contribution assessment rely on general accuracy evaluation, often failing to capture nuanced dynamics and class-specific influences. This paper proposes a novel contribution assessment method called ShapFed for fine-grained evaluation of participant contributions in FL. Our approach uses Shapley values from cooperative game theory to provide a granular understanding of class-specific influences. Based on ShapFed, we introduce a weighted aggregation method called ShapFed-WA, which outperforms conventional federated averaging, especially in class-imbalanced scenarios. Personalizing participant updates based on their contributions further enhances collaborative fairness by delivering differentiated models commensurate with the participant contributions. Experiments on CIFAR-10, Chest X-Ray, and Fed-ISIC2019 datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in improving utility, efficiency, and fairness in FL systems. The code can be found at https://github.com/tnurbek/shapfed.
6/4/2024
Federated Bayesian Deep Learning: The Application of Statistical Aggregation Methods to Bayesian Models
John Fischer, Marko Orescanin, Justin Loomis, Patrick McClure
0
0
Federated learning (FL) is an approach to training machine learning models that takes advantage of multiple distributed datasets while maintaining data privacy and reducing communication costs associated with sharing local datasets. Aggregation strategies have been developed to pool or fuse the weights and biases of distributed deterministic models; however, modern deterministic deep learning (DL) models are often poorly calibrated and lack the ability to communicate a measure of epistemic uncertainty in prediction, which is desirable for remote sensing platforms and safety-critical applications. Conversely, Bayesian DL models are often well calibrated and capable of quantifying and communicating a measure of epistemic uncertainty along with a competitive prediction accuracy. Unfortunately, because the weights and biases in Bayesian DL models are defined by a probability distribution, simple application of the aggregation methods associated with FL schemes for deterministic models is either impossible or results in sub-optimal performance. In this work, we use independent and identically distributed (IID) and non-IID partitions of the CIFAR-10 dataset and a fully variational ResNet-20 architecture to analyze six different aggregation strategies for Bayesian DL models. Additionally, we analyze the traditional federated averaging approach applied to an approximate Bayesian Monte Carlo dropout model as a lightweight alternative to more complex variational inference methods in FL. We show that aggregation strategy is a key hyperparameter in the design of a Bayesian FL system with downstream effects on accuracy, calibration, uncertainty quantification, training stability, and client compute requirements.
4/8/2024
š
Data Valuation and Detections in Federated Learning
Wenqian Li, Shuran Fu, Fengrui Zhang, Yan Pang
0
0
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training while preserving the privacy of raw data. A challenge in this framework is the fair and efficient valuation of data, which is crucial for incentivizing clients to contribute high-quality data in the FL task. In scenarios involving numerous data clients within FL, it is often the case that only a subset of clients and datasets are pertinent to a specific learning task, while others might have either a negative or negligible impact on the model training process. This paper introduces a novel privacy-preserving method for evaluating client contributions and selecting relevant datasets without a pre-specified training algorithm in an FL task. Our proposed approach FedBary, utilizes Wasserstein distance within the federated context, offering a new solution for data valuation in the FL framework. This method ensures transparent data valuation and efficient computation of the Wasserstein barycenter and reduces the dependence on validation datasets. Through extensive empirical experiments and theoretical analyses, we demonstrate the potential of this data valuation method as a promising avenue for FL research.
5/10/2024
Fair Federated Learning under Domain Skew with Local Consistency and Domain Diversity
Yuhang Chen, Wenke Huang, Mang Ye
0
0
Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a new paradigm for privacy-preserving collaborative training. Under domain skew, the current FL approaches are biased and face two fairness problems. 1) Parameter Update Conflict: data disparity among clients leads to varying parameter importance and inconsistent update directions. These two disparities cause important parameters to potentially be overwhelmed by unimportant ones of dominant updates. It consequently results in significant performance decreases for lower-performing clients. 2) Model Aggregation Bias: existing FL approaches introduce unfair weight allocation and neglect domain diversity. It leads to biased model convergence objective and distinct performance among domains. We discover a pronounced directional update consistency in Federated Learning and propose a novel framework to tackle above issues. First, leveraging the discovered characteristic, we selectively discard unimportant parameter updates to prevent updates from clients with lower performance overwhelmed by unimportant parameters, resulting in fairer generalization performance. Second, we propose a fair aggregation objective to prevent global model bias towards some domains, ensuring that the global model continuously aligns with an unbiased model. The proposed method is generic and can be combined with other existing FL methods to enhance fairness. Comprehensive experiments on Digits and Office-Caltech demonstrate the high fairness and performance of our method.
5/28/2024