Mitigating Hidden Confounding Effects for Causal Recommendation
0
👀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Recommender systems can suffer from biases when there are hidden factors (confounders) that affect both the item features and user feedback.
- Existing causal recommendation methods assume confounders are fully observed, which may not be the case in real-world applications.
- This paper proposes a Hidden Confounder Removal (HCR) framework to address the issue of hidden confounders.
Plain English Explanation
Recommender systems are algorithms that suggest products or content to users based on their past preferences and behaviors. However, these systems can sometimes be biased due to hidden factors that influence both the item features and the user's feedback (e.g., liking or not liking an item).
For example, product quality could be a hidden confounder that affects both the price of an item and a user's rating of that item. If the recommender system doesn't account for this hidden factor, it may end up over-recommending high-priced items, even if they are not the best quality.
The HCR framework proposed in this paper aims to address this issue by modeling the causal effect of item features on user feedback, while accounting for the potential presence of hidden confounders. This allows the system to make more accurate recommendations, especially for less-active users who may be more affected by these biases.
Technical Explanation
The key idea of the HCR framework is to decompose the causal effect of item features on user feedback into two partial effects, according to the mediators between the two. These partial effects are independent from the hidden confounder and can be identified.
During training, HCR performs multi-task learning to infer these partial effects from historical user-item interactions. The authors instantiate HCR for two specific scenarios and evaluate it on three real-world datasets, showing that HCR provides more accurate recommendations compared to existing methods, especially for less-active users.
The approach is related to other causal recommender systems like going beyond popularity, treatment effect estimation, and mitigating spurious correlations, as well as collaborative filtering-based diffusion models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to addressing the issue of hidden confounders in recommender systems. However, the authors acknowledge that estimating the partial effects may be challenging in practice, especially when the mediators between item features and user feedback are complex or not well-understood.
Additionally, the evaluation is limited to three datasets, and it would be interesting to see how the HCR framework performs on a wider range of real-world scenarios with different types of hidden confounders.
Further research could explore ways to make the HCR framework more robust to model misspecification or to incorporate additional information sources (e.g., user demographics, contextual factors) to better identify and mitigate hidden confounding effects.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a novel Hidden Confounder Removal (HCR) framework to address the problem of hidden confounders in recommender systems. By modeling the causal effect of item features on user feedback and accounting for hidden confounders, the HCR framework can provide more accurate recommendations, particularly for less-active users who may be more susceptible to biases.
The approach represents an important step forward in developing causal recommender systems that are robust to the presence of unobserved confounding factors, which is a common challenge in real-world applications. Further research and refinement of the HCR framework could lead to significant improvements in the reliability and fairness of recommender systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👀
0
Mitigating Hidden Confounding Effects for Causal Recommendation
Xinyuan Zhu, Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Xun Yang, Dingxian Wang, Xiangnan He
Recommender systems suffer from confounding biases when there exist confounders affecting both item features and user feedback (e.g., like or not). Existing causal recommendation methods typically assume confounders are fully observed and measured, forgoing the possible existence of hidden confounders in real applications. For instance, product quality is a confounder since affecting both item prices and user ratings, but is hidden for the third-party e-commerce platform due to the difficulty of large-scale quality inspection; ignoring it could result in the bias effect of over-recommending high-price items. This work analyzes and addresses the problem from a causal perspective. The key lies in modeling the causal effect of item features on a user's feedback. To mitigate hidden confounding effects, it is compulsory but challenging to estimate the causal effect without measuring the confounder. Towards this goal, we propose a Hidden Confounder Removal (HCR) framework that leverages front-door adjustment to decompose the causal effect into two partial effects, according to the mediators between item features and user feedback. The partial effects are independent from the hidden confounder and identifiable. During training, HCR performs multi-task learning to infer the partial effects from historical interactions. We instantiate HCR for two scenarios and conduct experiments on three real-world datasets. Empirical results show that the HCR framework provides more accurate recommendations, especially for less-active users. We will release the code once accepted.
Read more5/27/2024
🤯
0
Separating and Learning Latent Confounders to Enhancing User Preferences Modeling
Hangtong Xu, Yuanbo Xu, Yongjian Yang
Recommender models aim to capture user preferences from historical feedback and then predict user-specific feedback on candidate items. However, the presence of various unmeasured confounders causes deviations between the user preferences in the historical feedback and the true preferences, resulting in models not meeting their expected performance. Existing debias models either (1) specific to solving one particular bias or (2) directly obtain auxiliary information from user historical feedback, which cannot identify whether the learned preferences are true user preferences or mixed with unmeasured confounders. Moreover, we find that the former recommender system is not only a successor to unmeasured confounders but also acts as an unmeasured confounder affecting user preference modeling, which has always been neglected in previous studies. To this end, we incorporate the effect of the former recommender system and treat it as a proxy for all unmeasured confounders. We propose a novel framework, Separating and Learning Latent Confounders For Recommendation (SLFR), which obtains the representation of unmeasured confounders to identify the counterfactual feedback by disentangling user preferences and unmeasured confounders, then guides the target model to capture the true preferences of users. Extensive experiments in five real-world datasets validate the advantages of our method.
Read more4/3/2024
0
Causal Deconfounding via Confounder Disentanglement for Dual-Target Cross-Domain Recommendation
Jiajie Zhu, Yan Wang, Feng Zhu, Zhu Sun
In recent years, dual-target Cross-Domain Recommendation (CDR) has been proposed to capture comprehensive user preferences in order to ultimately enhance the recommendation accuracy in both data-richer and data-sparser domains simultaneously. However, in addition to users' true preferences, the user-item interactions might also be affected by confounders (e.g., free shipping, sales promotion). As a result, dual-target CDR has to meet two challenges: (1) how to effectively decouple observed confounders, including single-domain confounders and cross-domain confounders, and (2) how to preserve the positive effects of observed confounders on predicted interactions, while eliminating their negative effects on capturing comprehensive user preferences. To address the above two challenges, we propose a Causal Deconfounding framework via Confounder Disentanglement for dual-target Cross-Domain Recommendation, called CD2CDR. In CD2CDR, we first propose a confounder disentanglement module to effectively decouple observed single-domain and cross-domain confounders. We then propose a causal deconfounding module to preserve the positive effects of such observed confounders and eliminate their negative effects via backdoor adjustment, thereby enhancing the recommendation accuracy in each domain. Extensive experiments conducted on five real-world datasets demonstrate that CD2CDR significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.
Read more7/10/2024
0
Causal Distillation for Alleviating Performance Heterogeneity in Recommender Systems
Shengyu Zhang, Ziqi Jiang, Jiangchao Yao, Fuli Feng, Kun Kuang, Zhou Zhao, Shuo Li, Hongxia Yang, Tat-Seng Chua, Fei Wu
Recommendation performance usually exhibits a long-tail distribution over users -- a small portion of head users enjoy much more accurate recommendation services than the others. We reveal two sources of this performance heterogeneity problem: the uneven distribution of historical interactions (a natural source); and the biased training of recommender models (a model source). As addressing this problem cannot sacrifice the overall performance, a wise choice is to eliminate the model bias while maintaining the natural heterogeneity. The key to debiased training lies in eliminating the effect of confounders that influence both the user's historical behaviors and the next behavior. The emerging causal recommendation methods achieve this by modeling the causal effect between user behaviors, however potentially neglect unobserved confounders (eg, friend suggestions) that are hard to measure in practice. To address unobserved confounders, we resort to the front-door adjustment (FDA) in causal theory and propose a causal multi-teacher distillation framework (CausalD). FDA requires proper mediators in order to estimate the causal effects of historical behaviors on the next behavior. To achieve this, we equip CausalD with multiple heterogeneous recommendation models to model the mediator distribution. Then, the causal effect estimated by FDA is the expectation of recommendation prediction over the mediator distribution and the prior distribution of historical behaviors, which is technically achieved by multi-teacher ensemble. To pursue efficient inference, CausalD further distills multiple teachers into one student model to directly infer the causal effect for making recommendations.
Read more6/3/2024