Causal Distillation for Alleviating Performance Heterogeneity in Recommender Systems

Read original: arXiv:2405.20626 - Published 6/3/2024 by Shengyu Zhang, Ziqi Jiang, Jiangchao Yao, Fuli Feng, Kun Kuang, Zhou Zhao, Shuo Li, Hongxia Yang, Tat-Seng Chua, Fei Wu
Total Score

0

Causal Distillation for Alleviating Performance Heterogeneity in Recommender Systems

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates the issue of performance heterogeneity in recommender systems, where the system's performance varies across different user groups or contexts.
  • The authors propose a novel approach called "Causal Distillation" to alleviate this problem by leveraging causal relationships between the system's inputs and outputs.
  • The method involves using front-door adjustment, a causal inference technique, to estimate the causal effect of the system's recommendations on user engagement, which is then used to train a more equitable recommender model.

Plain English Explanation

Recommender systems are algorithms that suggest products, content, or information to users based on their preferences and behaviors. However, these systems can sometimes perform better for certain user groups than others, leading to unequal experiences and outcomes.

The Causal Distillation for Alleviating Performance Heterogeneity in Recommender Systems paper explores a way to address this issue by looking at the causal relationships between the system's inputs (user and item features) and its outputs (recommendations and user engagement).

The key idea is to use a causal inference technique called "front-door adjustment" to estimate the true causal effect of the recommendations on user engagement, rather than just relying on the observed correlation. This causal effect estimate is then used to train a new recommender model that is more equitable and performs better across different user groups.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their Causal Distillation approach through experiments on real-world datasets, showing that it can significantly improve performance fairness compared to traditional recommender systems. This work is an important step towards building more inclusive and ethical AI systems that don't discriminate against certain user segments.

Technical Explanation

The Causal Distillation for Alleviating Performance Heterogeneity in Recommender Systems paper presents a novel approach to address the problem of performance heterogeneity in recommender systems, where the system's performance varies across different user groups or contexts.

The key idea is to leverage causal relationships between the system's inputs (user and item features) and outputs (recommendations and user engagement) to train a more equitable recommender model. The authors use a causal inference technique called "front-door adjustment" to estimate the true causal effect of the recommendations on user engagement, which is then used as the training signal for the distilled recommender model.

Formally, the front-door adjustment formula is used to compute the causal effect of recommendations on user engagement, which takes into account any hidden confounding factors that may be influencing both the recommendations and user engagement. This causal effect estimate is then used as the training target for a student recommender model, which is trained to mimic the causal behavior of the original recommender model.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their Causal Distillation approach through experiments on real-world datasets, including MovieLens, Amazon, and Yelp. The results show that the Causal Distillation method can significantly improve performance fairness across different user groups compared to traditional recommender systems.

Critical Analysis

The Causal Distillation for Alleviating Performance Heterogeneity in Recommender Systems paper presents a promising approach to address the important issue of performance heterogeneity in recommender systems. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be considered:

  1. The paper assumes the existence of a known set of confounding variables that influence both the recommendations and user engagement. In practice, identifying and measuring all relevant confounding factors may be challenging, which could affect the accuracy of the front-door adjustment.

  2. The experiments in the paper focus on static recommender systems, but in many real-world scenarios, recommender systems operate in dynamic, constantly evolving environments. Further research is needed to investigate the effectiveness of Causal Distillation in handling temporal shifts in user preferences and item catalogs, as addressed in Retrieval Distill: A Temporal Data Shift-Free Paradigm.

  3. The paper evaluates fairness in terms of performance parity across different user groups, but there may be other important fairness considerations, such as ensuring equal exposure to different items or preventing the amplification of historical biases, as discussed in Cross-Domain Causal Preference Learning for Out-of-Distribution Recommendation.

  4. While the Causal Distillation approach shows promising results, it would be valuable to compare its performance to other recent techniques for improving fairness and robustness in recommender systems, such as Continual Collaborative Distillation and Distillation Matters, to better understand its relative strengths and weaknesses.

Overall, the Causal Distillation for Alleviating Performance Heterogeneity in Recommender Systems paper presents an innovative approach to improving fairness in recommender systems, and the proposed method warrants further investigation and comparison to other state-of-the-art techniques in this important area of AI research.

Conclusion

The Causal Distillation for Alleviating Performance Heterogeneity in Recommender Systems paper tackles the critical problem of performance heterogeneity in recommender systems, where the system's performance varies across different user groups or contexts.

The authors propose a novel "Causal Distillation" approach that leverages causal inference techniques to estimate the true causal effect of the recommendations on user engagement, which is then used to train a more equitable recommender model. The experimental results demonstrate that this method can significantly improve performance fairness across different user segments compared to traditional recommender systems.

This work is an important contribution to the field of fair and inclusive AI, as it suggests a promising path towards building recommender systems that provide high-quality and unbiased experiences for all users, regardless of their individual characteristics or backgrounds. By considering the causal relationships underlying the recommender system's behavior, the Causal Distillation approach represents a significant step forward in addressing the critical issue of performance heterogeneity in real-world AI applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Causal Distillation for Alleviating Performance Heterogeneity in Recommender Systems
Total Score

0

Causal Distillation for Alleviating Performance Heterogeneity in Recommender Systems

Shengyu Zhang, Ziqi Jiang, Jiangchao Yao, Fuli Feng, Kun Kuang, Zhou Zhao, Shuo Li, Hongxia Yang, Tat-Seng Chua, Fei Wu

Recommendation performance usually exhibits a long-tail distribution over users -- a small portion of head users enjoy much more accurate recommendation services than the others. We reveal two sources of this performance heterogeneity problem: the uneven distribution of historical interactions (a natural source); and the biased training of recommender models (a model source). As addressing this problem cannot sacrifice the overall performance, a wise choice is to eliminate the model bias while maintaining the natural heterogeneity. The key to debiased training lies in eliminating the effect of confounders that influence both the user's historical behaviors and the next behavior. The emerging causal recommendation methods achieve this by modeling the causal effect between user behaviors, however potentially neglect unobserved confounders (eg, friend suggestions) that are hard to measure in practice. To address unobserved confounders, we resort to the front-door adjustment (FDA) in causal theory and propose a causal multi-teacher distillation framework (CausalD). FDA requires proper mediators in order to estimate the causal effects of historical behaviors on the next behavior. To achieve this, we equip CausalD with multiple heterogeneous recommendation models to model the mediator distribution. Then, the causal effect estimated by FDA is the expectation of recommendation prediction over the mediator distribution and the prior distribution of historical behaviors, which is technically achieved by multi-teacher ensemble. To pursue efficient inference, CausalD further distills multiple teachers into one student model to directly infer the causal effect for making recommendations.

Read more

6/3/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Mitigating Hidden Confounding Effects for Causal Recommendation

Xinyuan Zhu, Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Xun Yang, Dingxian Wang, Xiangnan He

Recommender systems suffer from confounding biases when there exist confounders affecting both item features and user feedback (e.g., like or not). Existing causal recommendation methods typically assume confounders are fully observed and measured, forgoing the possible existence of hidden confounders in real applications. For instance, product quality is a confounder since affecting both item prices and user ratings, but is hidden for the third-party e-commerce platform due to the difficulty of large-scale quality inspection; ignoring it could result in the bias effect of over-recommending high-price items. This work analyzes and addresses the problem from a causal perspective. The key lies in modeling the causal effect of item features on a user's feedback. To mitigate hidden confounding effects, it is compulsory but challenging to estimate the causal effect without measuring the confounder. Towards this goal, we propose a Hidden Confounder Removal (HCR) framework that leverages front-door adjustment to decompose the causal effect into two partial effects, according to the mediators between item features and user feedback. The partial effects are independent from the hidden confounder and identifiable. During training, HCR performs multi-task learning to infer the partial effects from historical interactions. We instantiate HCR for two scenarios and conduct experiments on three real-world datasets. Empirical results show that the HCR framework provides more accurate recommendations, especially for less-active users. We will release the code once accepted.

Read more

5/27/2024

Distilling interpretable causal trees from causal forests
Total Score

0

Distilling interpretable causal trees from causal forests

Patrick Rehill

Machine learning methods for estimating treatment effect heterogeneity promise greater flexibility than existing methods that test a few pre-specified hypotheses. However, one problem these methods can have is that it can be challenging to extract insights from complicated machine learning models. A high-dimensional distribution of conditional average treatment effects may give accurate, individual-level estimates, but it can be hard to understand the underlying patterns; hard to know what the implications of the analysis are. This paper proposes the Distilled Causal Tree, a method for distilling a single, interpretable causal tree from a causal forest. This compares well to existing methods of extracting a single tree, particularly in noisy data or high-dimensional data where there are many correlated features. Here it even outperforms the base causal forest in most simulations. Its estimates are doubly robust and asymptotically normal just as those of the causal forest are.

Read more

8/6/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

A Survey on Causal Inference for Recommendation

Huishi Luo, Fuzhen Zhuang, Ruobing Xie, Hengshu Zhu, Deqing Wang, Zhulin An, Yongjun Xu

Causal inference has recently garnered significant interest among recommender system (RS) researchers due to its ability to dissect cause-and-effect relationships and its broad applicability across multiple fields. It offers a framework to model the causality in recommender systems like confounding effects and deal with counterfactual problems such as offline policy evaluation and data augmentation. Although there are already some valuable surveys on causal recommendations, they typically classify approaches based on the practical issues faced in RS, a classification that may disperse and fragment the unified causal theories. Considering RS researchers' unfamiliarity with causality, it is necessary yet challenging to comprehensively review relevant studies from a coherent causal theoretical perspective, thereby facilitating a deeper integration of causal inference in RS. This survey provides a systematic review of up-to-date papers in this area from a causal theory standpoint and traces the evolutionary development of RS methods within the same causal strategy. Firstly, we introduce the fundamental concepts of causal inference as the basis of the following review. Subsequently, we propose a novel theory-driven taxonomy, categorizing existing methods based on the causal theory employed - namely, those based on the potential outcome framework, the structural causal model, and general counterfactuals. The review then delves into the technical details of how existing methods apply causal inference to address particular recommender issues. Finally, we highlight some promising directions for future research in this field. Representative papers and open-source resources will be progressively available at https://github.com/Chrissie-Law/Causal-Inference-for-Recommendation.

Read more

7/9/2024