MLLM-Protector: Ensuring MLLM's Safety without Hurting Performance
2401.02906
0
0
Abstract
The deployment of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has brought forth a unique vulnerability: susceptibility to malicious attacks through visual inputs. This paper investigates the novel challenge of defending MLLMs against such attacks. Compared to large language models (LLMs), MLLMs include an additional image modality. We discover that images act as a ``foreign language that is not considered during safety alignment, making MLLMs more prone to producing harmful responses. Unfortunately, unlike the discrete tokens considered in text-based LLMs, the continuous nature of image signals presents significant alignment challenges, which poses difficulty to thoroughly cover all possible scenarios. This vulnerability is exacerbated by the fact that most state-of-the-art MLLMs are fine-tuned on limited image-text pairs that are much fewer than the extensive text-based pretraining corpus, which makes the MLLMs more prone to catastrophic forgetting of their original abilities during safety fine-tuning. To tackle these challenges, we introduce MLLM-Protector, a plug-and-play strategy that solves two subtasks: 1) identifying harmful responses via a lightweight harm detector, and 2) transforming harmful responses into harmless ones via a detoxifier. This approach effectively mitigates the risks posed by malicious visual inputs without compromising the original performance of MLLMs. Our results demonstrate that MLLM-Protector offers a robust solution to a previously unaddressed aspect of MLLM security.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents MLLM-Protector, a framework for ensuring the safety of multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) without compromising their performance.
- The authors address the potential risks associated with MLLMs, which can generate harmful or biased content, and propose a multi-dimensional safety evaluation suite to assess MLLM safety.
- The paper also introduces a benchmark for evaluating the safety of multi-modal large language models, called MM-SafetyBench, and explores techniques like instruction tuning and real-time safeguarding to improve MLLM safety.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on multi-modal large language models (MLLMs). These are powerful AI models that can understand and generate text, images, and other types of data. While MLLMs have many impressive capabilities, there are also concerns about their potential to produce harmful or biased content.
The researchers have developed a framework called MLLM-Protector to help address these safety issues. The key idea is to evaluate the safety of MLLMs using a comprehensive multi-dimensional safety evaluation suite. This allows them to identify potential risks, such as the model generating inappropriate or dangerous content.
The paper also introduces a new benchmark called MM-SafetyBench to help measure the safety of multi-modal language models. This provides a standardized way to assess how well these models perform on a variety of safety-related tasks.
In addition, the researchers explore techniques like instruction tuning and real-time safeguarding to improve the safety of MLLMs without significantly impacting their performance. These approaches aim to help ensure that MLLMs can be used safely and responsibly.
Overall, this research is an important step in developing more robust and reliable multi-modal language models that can be deployed in real-world applications without posing undue risks.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents MLLM-Protector, a framework for ensuring the safety of multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) without compromising their performance. The authors address the potential risks associated with MLLMs, which can generate harmful or biased content, and propose a multi-dimensional safety evaluation suite to assess MLLM safety.
The MM-SafetyBench benchmark is introduced to evaluate the safety of multi-modal language models across various tasks, including text generation, image generation, and cross-modal reasoning. The benchmark covers multiple safety dimensions, such as content safety, task safety, and real-time safety.
The paper also explores techniques to improve MLLM safety without significantly impacting performance. Instruction tuning is used to fine-tune the model on safety-critical tasks, while real-time safeguarding is employed to monitor and intervene in the model's output during generation.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive approach to ensuring the safety of multi-modal large language models, which is a critical issue as these models become more widely deployed. The multi-dimensional safety evaluation suite and the MM-SafetyBench benchmark provide a thorough framework for assessing MLLM safety across various dimensions.
However, the paper does not address the potential limitations of the proposed techniques. For example, the effectiveness of instruction tuning and real-time safeguarding may be dependent on the specific use case and the type of content the MLLM is generating. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential trade-offs between safety and performance that may arise when applying these techniques.
Further research is needed to explore the long-term implications of using MLLM-Protector in real-world applications, as well as to investigate the potential for unintended consequences or edge cases that may arise. Ongoing monitoring and evaluation will be crucial to ensure the continued safety and responsible deployment of these powerful models.
Conclusion
The MLLM-Protector framework presented in this paper is an important step towards ensuring the safety of multi-modal large language models without compromising their performance. By introducing a comprehensive safety evaluation suite and a dedicated benchmark, the researchers have laid the groundwork for more robust and reliable MLLM deployment.
The techniques of instruction tuning and real-time safeguarding offer promising approaches to enhancing MLLM safety, though further research is needed to fully understand their long-term implications and limitations.
As multi-modal language models continue to advance, the importance of proactively addressing safety concerns will only grow. The MLLM-Protector framework provides a valuable foundation for future work in this critical area, with the potential to help ensure that these powerful AI technologies are deployed responsibly and in service of the greater good.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Safety of Multimodal Large Language Models on Images and Texts
Xin Liu, Yichen Zhu, Yunshi Lan, Chao Yang, Yu Qiao
0
0
Attracted by the impressive power of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), the public is increasingly utilizing them to improve the efficiency of daily work. Nonetheless, the vulnerabilities of MLLMs to unsafe instructions bring huge safety risks when these models are deployed in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we systematically survey current efforts on the evaluation, attack, and defense of MLLMs' safety on images and text. We begin with introducing the overview of MLLMs on images and text and understanding of safety, which helps researchers know the detailed scope of our survey. Then, we review the evaluation datasets and metrics for measuring the safety of MLLMs. Next, we comprehensively present attack and defense techniques related to MLLMs' safety. Finally, we analyze several unsolved issues and discuss promising research directions. The latest papers are continually collected at https://github.com/isXinLiu/MLLM-Safety-Collection.
6/21/2024
MLLMGuard: A Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation Suite for Multimodal Large Language Models
Tianle Gu, Zeyang Zhou, Kexin Huang, Dandan Liang, Yixu Wang, Haiquan Zhao, Yuanqi Yao, Xingge Qiao, Keqing Wang, Yujiu Yang, Yan Teng, Yu Qiao, Yingchun Wang
0
0
Powered by remarkable advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities in manifold tasks. However, the practical application scenarios of MLLMs are intricate, exposing them to potential malicious instructions and thereby posing safety risks. While current benchmarks do incorporate certain safety considerations, they often lack comprehensive coverage and fail to exhibit the necessary rigor and robustness. For instance, the common practice of employing GPT-4V as both the evaluator and a model to be evaluated lacks credibility, as it tends to exhibit a bias toward its own responses. In this paper, we present MLLMGuard, a multidimensional safety evaluation suite for MLLMs, including a bilingual image-text evaluation dataset, inference utilities, and a lightweight evaluator. MLLMGuard's assessment comprehensively covers two languages (English and Chinese) and five important safety dimensions (Privacy, Bias, Toxicity, Truthfulness, and Legality), each with corresponding rich subtasks. Focusing on these dimensions, our evaluation dataset is primarily sourced from platforms such as social media, and it integrates text-based and image-based red teaming techniques with meticulous annotation by human experts. This can prevent inaccurate evaluation caused by data leakage when using open-source datasets and ensures the quality and challenging nature of our benchmark. Additionally, a fully automated lightweight evaluator termed GuardRank is developed, which achieves significantly higher evaluation accuracy than GPT-4. Our evaluation results across 13 advanced models indicate that MLLMs still have a substantial journey ahead before they can be considered safe and responsible.
6/14/2024
💬
MM-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models
Xin Liu, Yichen Zhu, Jindong Gu, Yunshi Lan, Chao Yang, Yu Qiao
0
0
The security concerns surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively explored, yet the safety of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remains understudied. In this paper, we observe that Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can be easily compromised by query-relevant images, as if the text query itself were malicious. To address this, we introduce MM-SafetyBench, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety-critical evaluations of MLLMs against such image-based manipulations. We have compiled a dataset comprising 13 scenarios, resulting in a total of 5,040 text-image pairs. Our analysis across 12 state-of-the-art models reveals that MLLMs are susceptible to breaches instigated by our approach, even when the equipped LLMs have been safety-aligned. In response, we propose a straightforward yet effective prompting strategy to enhance the resilience of MLLMs against these types of attacks. Our work underscores the need for a concerted effort to strengthen and enhance the safety measures of open-source MLLMs against potential malicious exploits. The resource is available at https://github.com/isXinLiu/MM-SafetyBench
6/21/2024
Unbridled Icarus: A Survey of the Potential Perils of Image Inputs in Multimodal Large Language Model Security
Yihe Fan, Yuxin Cao, Ziyu Zhao, Ziyao Liu, Shaofeng Li
0
0
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities that increasingly influence various aspects of our daily lives, constantly defining the new boundary of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Image modalities, enriched with profound semantic information and a more continuous mathematical nature compared to other modalities, greatly enhance the functionalities of MLLMs when integrated. However, this integration serves as a double-edged sword, providing attackers with expansive vulnerabilities to exploit for highly covert and harmful attacks. The pursuit of reliable AI systems like powerful MLLMs has emerged as a pivotal area of contemporary research. In this paper, we endeavor to demostrate the multifaceted risks associated with the incorporation of image modalities into MLLMs. Initially, we delineate the foundational components and training processes of MLLMs. Subsequently, we construct a threat model, outlining the security vulnerabilities intrinsic to MLLMs. Moreover, we analyze and summarize existing scholarly discourses on MLLMs' attack and defense mechanisms, culminating in suggestions for the future research on MLLM security. Through this comprehensive analysis, we aim to deepen the academic understanding of MLLM security challenges and propel forward the development of trustworthy MLLM systems.
4/9/2024