Safety of Multimodal Large Language Models on Images and Texts
2402.00357
0
0
💬
Abstract
Attracted by the impressive power of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), the public is increasingly utilizing them to improve the efficiency of daily work. Nonetheless, the vulnerabilities of MLLMs to unsafe instructions bring huge safety risks when these models are deployed in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we systematically survey current efforts on the evaluation, attack, and defense of MLLMs' safety on images and text. We begin with introducing the overview of MLLMs on images and text and understanding of safety, which helps researchers know the detailed scope of our survey. Then, we review the evaluation datasets and metrics for measuring the safety of MLLMs. Next, we comprehensively present attack and defense techniques related to MLLMs' safety. Finally, we analyze several unsolved issues and discuss promising research directions. The latest papers are continually collected at https://github.com/isXinLiu/MLLM-Safety-Collection.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the safety of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), which are powerful AI systems that can process and generate both images and text.
- As these models become more widely used in daily tasks, there are growing concerns about their potential vulnerabilities and the safety risks they pose when deployed in real-world scenarios.
- The paper provides a comprehensive survey of current efforts on evaluating, attacking, and defending the safety of MLLMs for both image and text inputs.
Plain English Explanation
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are advanced artificial intelligence systems that can understand and create both images and text. These powerful models are becoming increasingly popular for improving the efficiency of everyday tasks. However, there are significant safety concerns around MLLMs, as they can be vulnerable to unsafe instructions that could lead to serious risks when deployed in the real world.
This paper looks at the current research on evaluating, attacking, and defending the safety of MLLMs. The authors start by providing an overview of MLLMs and what is meant by "safety" in this context. They then review the datasets and metrics used to measure the safety of these models. Next, they explore the different techniques that have been developed to both attack and defend against safety issues with MLLMs, particularly when it comes to image and text inputs.
Finally, the paper identifies several unresolved problems and discusses promising directions for future research in this area. The goal is to help researchers and developers better understand the safety challenges of MLLMs and work towards making these powerful models more secure and reliable for real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by introducing the concept of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) and the importance of understanding their safety. MLLMs are AI systems that can process and generate both images and text, making them highly versatile and powerful. However, the authors note that the vulnerabilities of MLLMs to unsafe instructions present significant safety risks when these models are deployed in real-world scenarios.
To address this issue, the paper systematically surveys the current efforts on evaluating, attacking, and defending the safety of MLLMs. The authors first review the datasets and metrics used to measure the safety of these models, such as the MM-SafetyBench benchmark and the MLLMGuard multi-dimensional safety evaluation suite.
Next, the paper comprehensively presents the various attack and defense techniques related to MLLM safety. This includes exploring the potential perils of image inputs, as discussed in the Unbridled Icarus survey, as well as defense strategies like MLLM Protector and cross-task defense through instruction tuning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-structured overview of the current research on MLLM safety. The authors have done a commendable job of synthesizing the key findings from various studies and presenting them in a coherent manner.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it primarily focuses on the technical aspects of MLLM safety, with limited discussion of the broader societal implications and ethical considerations. As these models become more widely adopted, it will be important to also address the potential risks and challenges they pose from a societal and ethical perspective.
Additionally, while the paper identifies several unsolved issues and promising research directions, it would have been helpful to delve deeper into these areas and provide more specific insights or recommendations for future work. This could help guide the research community in addressing the most pressing challenges in MLLM safety.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive survey of the current efforts on evaluating, attacking, and defending the safety of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). As these powerful AI systems become more widely used in daily tasks, understanding and addressing their safety vulnerabilities is crucial to ensuring their responsible deployment in real-world scenarios.
The authors have provided a detailed overview of the existing datasets, metrics, attack techniques, and defense strategies related to MLLM safety. This information is invaluable for researchers and developers working to improve the security and reliability of these models.
While the paper focuses primarily on the technical aspects of MLLM safety, the insights it provides lay the groundwork for further exploration of the broader societal and ethical implications of these technologies. By continuing to advance the understanding and mitigation of MLLM safety risks, the research community can help ensure that these powerful tools are used in a safe and responsible manner to benefit society as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
MM-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models
Xin Liu, Yichen Zhu, Jindong Gu, Yunshi Lan, Chao Yang, Yu Qiao
0
0
The security concerns surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively explored, yet the safety of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remains understudied. In this paper, we observe that Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can be easily compromised by query-relevant images, as if the text query itself were malicious. To address this, we introduce MM-SafetyBench, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety-critical evaluations of MLLMs against such image-based manipulations. We have compiled a dataset comprising 13 scenarios, resulting in a total of 5,040 text-image pairs. Our analysis across 12 state-of-the-art models reveals that MLLMs are susceptible to breaches instigated by our approach, even when the equipped LLMs have been safety-aligned. In response, we propose a straightforward yet effective prompting strategy to enhance the resilience of MLLMs against these types of attacks. Our work underscores the need for a concerted effort to strengthen and enhance the safety measures of open-source MLLMs against potential malicious exploits. The resource is available at https://github.com/isXinLiu/MM-SafetyBench
6/21/2024
MLLMGuard: A Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation Suite for Multimodal Large Language Models
Tianle Gu, Zeyang Zhou, Kexin Huang, Dandan Liang, Yixu Wang, Haiquan Zhao, Yuanqi Yao, Xingge Qiao, Keqing Wang, Yujiu Yang, Yan Teng, Yu Qiao, Yingchun Wang
0
0
Powered by remarkable advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities in manifold tasks. However, the practical application scenarios of MLLMs are intricate, exposing them to potential malicious instructions and thereby posing safety risks. While current benchmarks do incorporate certain safety considerations, they often lack comprehensive coverage and fail to exhibit the necessary rigor and robustness. For instance, the common practice of employing GPT-4V as both the evaluator and a model to be evaluated lacks credibility, as it tends to exhibit a bias toward its own responses. In this paper, we present MLLMGuard, a multidimensional safety evaluation suite for MLLMs, including a bilingual image-text evaluation dataset, inference utilities, and a lightweight evaluator. MLLMGuard's assessment comprehensively covers two languages (English and Chinese) and five important safety dimensions (Privacy, Bias, Toxicity, Truthfulness, and Legality), each with corresponding rich subtasks. Focusing on these dimensions, our evaluation dataset is primarily sourced from platforms such as social media, and it integrates text-based and image-based red teaming techniques with meticulous annotation by human experts. This can prevent inaccurate evaluation caused by data leakage when using open-source datasets and ensures the quality and challenging nature of our benchmark. Additionally, a fully automated lightweight evaluator termed GuardRank is developed, which achieves significantly higher evaluation accuracy than GPT-4. Our evaluation results across 13 advanced models indicate that MLLMs still have a substantial journey ahead before they can be considered safe and responsible.
6/14/2024
Unbridled Icarus: A Survey of the Potential Perils of Image Inputs in Multimodal Large Language Model Security
Yihe Fan, Yuxin Cao, Ziyu Zhao, Ziyao Liu, Shaofeng Li
0
0
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities that increasingly influence various aspects of our daily lives, constantly defining the new boundary of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Image modalities, enriched with profound semantic information and a more continuous mathematical nature compared to other modalities, greatly enhance the functionalities of MLLMs when integrated. However, this integration serves as a double-edged sword, providing attackers with expansive vulnerabilities to exploit for highly covert and harmful attacks. The pursuit of reliable AI systems like powerful MLLMs has emerged as a pivotal area of contemporary research. In this paper, we endeavor to demostrate the multifaceted risks associated with the incorporation of image modalities into MLLMs. Initially, we delineate the foundational components and training processes of MLLMs. Subsequently, we construct a threat model, outlining the security vulnerabilities intrinsic to MLLMs. Moreover, we analyze and summarize existing scholarly discourses on MLLMs' attack and defense mechanisms, culminating in suggestions for the future research on MLLM security. Through this comprehensive analysis, we aim to deepen the academic understanding of MLLM security challenges and propel forward the development of trustworthy MLLM systems.
4/9/2024
MLLM-Protector: Ensuring MLLM's Safety without Hurting Performance
Renjie Pi, Tianyang Han, Jianshu Zhang, Yueqi Xie, Rui Pan, Qing Lian, Hanze Dong, Jipeng Zhang, Tong Zhang
0
0
The deployment of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has brought forth a unique vulnerability: susceptibility to malicious attacks through visual inputs. This paper investigates the novel challenge of defending MLLMs against such attacks. Compared to large language models (LLMs), MLLMs include an additional image modality. We discover that images act as a ``foreign language that is not considered during safety alignment, making MLLMs more prone to producing harmful responses. Unfortunately, unlike the discrete tokens considered in text-based LLMs, the continuous nature of image signals presents significant alignment challenges, which poses difficulty to thoroughly cover all possible scenarios. This vulnerability is exacerbated by the fact that most state-of-the-art MLLMs are fine-tuned on limited image-text pairs that are much fewer than the extensive text-based pretraining corpus, which makes the MLLMs more prone to catastrophic forgetting of their original abilities during safety fine-tuning. To tackle these challenges, we introduce MLLM-Protector, a plug-and-play strategy that solves two subtasks: 1) identifying harmful responses via a lightweight harm detector, and 2) transforming harmful responses into harmless ones via a detoxifier. This approach effectively mitigates the risks posed by malicious visual inputs without compromising the original performance of MLLMs. Our results demonstrate that MLLM-Protector offers a robust solution to a previously unaddressed aspect of MLLM security.
6/18/2024