Benchmarking Trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Study
2406.07057
0
0
š¬
Abstract
Despite the superior capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) across diverse tasks, they still face significant trustworthiness challenges. Yet, current literature on the assessment of trustworthy MLLMs remains limited, lacking a holistic evaluation to offer thorough insights into future improvements. In this work, we establish MultiTrust, the first comprehensive and unified benchmark on the trustworthiness of MLLMs across five primary aspects: truthfulness, safety, robustness, fairness, and privacy. Our benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts, encompassing 32 diverse tasks with self-curated datasets. Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks, highlighting the complexities introduced by the multimodality and underscoring the necessity for advanced methodologies to enhance their reliability. For instance, typical proprietary models still struggle with the perception of visually confusing images and are vulnerable to multimodal jailbreaking and adversarial attacks; MLLMs are more inclined to disclose privacy in text and reveal ideological and cultural biases even when paired with irrelevant images in inference, indicating that the multimodality amplifies the internal risks from base LLMs. Additionally, we release a scalable toolbox for standardized trustworthiness research, aiming to facilitate future advancements in this important field. Code and resources are publicly available at: https://multi-trust.github.io/.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper establishes MultiTrust, the first comprehensive benchmark for assessing the trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs).
- MultiTrust evaluates MLLMs across five key aspects: truthfulness, safety, robustness, fairness, and privacy.
- The benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts, covering 32 diverse tasks with self-curated datasets.
- Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks, highlighting the complexities introduced by multimodality.
Plain English Explanation
Despite the impressive capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), these powerful AI systems still face significant challenges when it comes to being trustworthy. Current research on evaluating the trustworthiness of MLLMs is limited, lacking a comprehensive approach to provide thorough insights for future improvements.
To address this gap, the researchers in this study have developed MultiTrust, the first comprehensive benchmark that assesses the trustworthiness of MLLMs across five key areas: truthfulness, safety, robustness, fairness, and privacy. This benchmark uses a rigorous evaluation strategy that looks at the risks and impacts of multimodal (text and images) interactions, covering a wide range of 32 diverse tasks with specially curated datasets.
When the researchers tested 21 modern MLLM systems using MultiTrust, they uncovered some previously unknown trustworthiness issues and risks. For example, they found that even popular and proprietary MLLM models still struggle with accurately perceiving visually confusing images and are vulnerable to attacks that can bypass their safety measures. The researchers also discovered that MLLMs are more likely to disclose private information in text and reveal biases related to ideology and culture, especially when paired with irrelevant images during the inference process. These findings suggest that the multimodal nature of these AI systems can amplify the internal risks that exist in the base language models they are built upon.
To help drive future advancements in this important field, the researchers have also released a scalable toolbox for standardized trustworthiness research, which is publicly available for other researchers and developers to use.
Technical Explanation
The paper establishes MultiTrust, the first comprehensive and unified benchmark for assessing the trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) across five primary aspects: truthfulness, safety, robustness, fairness, and privacy.
The benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts, encompassing 32 diverse tasks with self-curated datasets. This approach aims to provide thorough insights into future improvements for enhancing the reliability of MLLMs.
Extensive experiments were conducted with 21 modern MLLM systems, revealing some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks. The findings highlight the complexities introduced by multimodality, indicating that typical proprietary models still struggle with the perception of visually confusing images and are vulnerable to multimodal jailbreaking and adversarial attacks.
Furthermore, the researchers found that MLLMs are more inclined to disclose privacy in text and reveal ideological and cultural biases even when paired with irrelevant images during inference, suggesting that the multimodality amplifies the internal risks from base Large Language Models (LLMs).
To facilitate future advancements in this important field, the researchers have released a scalable toolbox for standardized trustworthiness research, which is publicly available at: https://multi-trust.github.io/.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-designed benchmark for evaluating the trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). The researchers have thoughtfully considered multiple aspects of trustworthiness, including truthfulness, safety, robustness, fairness, and privacy, which is crucial for understanding the real-world reliability and responsible deployment of these powerful AI systems.
One potential limitation of the study is the reliance on self-curated datasets, which may introduce certain biases or lack diversity compared to more broadly sourced datasets. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms or techniques employed by the 21 MLLM systems tested, which could provide further insights into the root causes of the observed trustworthiness issues.
Moreover, the paper does not address the potential trade-offs or tensions that may arise when optimizing for different trustworthiness aspects, such as the balance between safety and functionality or the challenges of ensuring fairness in the face of complex multimodal inputs.
Nevertheless, the researchers have made a valuable contribution by establishing a standardized benchmark for trustworthiness evaluation and highlighting the critical need for further advancements in this area. Encouraging other researchers and developers to build upon this work and explore these challenges in greater depth will be crucial for enhancing the reliability and responsible deployment of Multimodal Large Language Models.
Conclusion
This paper presents a groundbreaking effort to establish a comprehensive benchmark, known as MultiTrust, for assessing the trustworthiness of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). By evaluating these powerful AI systems across five key aspects ā truthfulness, safety, robustness, fairness, and privacy ā the researchers have uncovered previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks.
The findings highlight the complexities introduced by the multimodal nature of these models, indicating that even proprietary MLLM systems still struggle with accurately perceiving visual information and are vulnerable to various attacks. Additionally, the researchers discovered that MLLMs are more inclined to disclose private information and reveal biases, suggesting that the multimodal approach can amplify the internal risks inherent in the base Large Language Models (LLMs) they are built upon.
By releasing a scalable toolbox for standardized trustworthiness research, the researchers have paved the way for future advancements in this critical field. As Multimodal Large Language Models continue to gain prominence in various applications, ensuring their trustworthiness will be paramount for realizing their full potential and fostering responsible AI development.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¬
MM-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models
Xin Liu, Yichen Zhu, Jindong Gu, Yunshi Lan, Chao Yang, Yu Qiao
0
0
The security concerns surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively explored, yet the safety of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remains understudied. In this paper, we observe that Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can be easily compromised by query-relevant images, as if the text query itself were malicious. To address this, we introduce MM-SafetyBench, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety-critical evaluations of MLLMs against such image-based manipulations. We have compiled a dataset comprising 13 scenarios, resulting in a total of 5,040 text-image pairs. Our analysis across 12 state-of-the-art models reveals that MLLMs are susceptible to breaches instigated by our approach, even when the equipped LLMs have been safety-aligned. In response, we propose a straightforward yet effective prompting strategy to enhance the resilience of MLLMs against these types of attacks. Our work underscores the need for a concerted effort to strengthen and enhance the safety measures of open-source MLLMs against potential malicious exploits. The resource is available at https://github.com/isXinLiu/MM-SafetyBench
6/21/2024
MLLMGuard: A Multi-dimensional Safety Evaluation Suite for Multimodal Large Language Models
Tianle Gu, Zeyang Zhou, Kexin Huang, Dandan Liang, Yixu Wang, Haiquan Zhao, Yuanqi Yao, Xingge Qiao, Keqing Wang, Yujiu Yang, Yan Teng, Yu Qiao, Yingchun Wang
0
0
Powered by remarkable advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities in manifold tasks. However, the practical application scenarios of MLLMs are intricate, exposing them to potential malicious instructions and thereby posing safety risks. While current benchmarks do incorporate certain safety considerations, they often lack comprehensive coverage and fail to exhibit the necessary rigor and robustness. For instance, the common practice of employing GPT-4V as both the evaluator and a model to be evaluated lacks credibility, as it tends to exhibit a bias toward its own responses. In this paper, we present MLLMGuard, a multidimensional safety evaluation suite for MLLMs, including a bilingual image-text evaluation dataset, inference utilities, and a lightweight evaluator. MLLMGuard's assessment comprehensively covers two languages (English and Chinese) and five important safety dimensions (Privacy, Bias, Toxicity, Truthfulness, and Legality), each with corresponding rich subtasks. Focusing on these dimensions, our evaluation dataset is primarily sourced from platforms such as social media, and it integrates text-based and image-based red teaming techniques with meticulous annotation by human experts. This can prevent inaccurate evaluation caused by data leakage when using open-source datasets and ensures the quality and challenging nature of our benchmark. Additionally, a fully automated lightweight evaluator termed GuardRank is developed, which achieves significantly higher evaluation accuracy than GPT-4. Our evaluation results across 13 advanced models indicate that MLLMs still have a substantial journey ahead before they can be considered safe and responsible.
6/14/2024
š¶
Enhancing Trust in LLMs: Algorithms for Comparing and Interpreting LLMs
Nik Bear Brown
0
0
This paper surveys evaluation techniques to enhance the trustworthiness and understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs). As reliance on LLMs grows, ensuring their reliability, fairness, and transparency is crucial. We explore algorithmic methods and metrics to assess LLM performance, identify weaknesses, and guide development towards more trustworthy applications. Key evaluation metrics include Perplexity Measurement, NLP metrics (BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR, BERTScore, GLEU, Word Error Rate, Character Error Rate), Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Learning Performance, Transfer Learning Evaluation, Adversarial Testing, and Fairness and Bias Evaluation. We introduce innovative approaches like LLMMaps for stratified evaluation, Benchmarking and Leaderboards for competitive assessment, Stratified Analysis for in-depth understanding, Visualization of Blooms Taxonomy for cognitive level accuracy distribution, Hallucination Score for quantifying inaccuracies, Knowledge Stratification Strategy for hierarchical analysis, and Machine Learning Models for Hierarchy Generation. Human Evaluation is highlighted for capturing nuances that automated metrics may miss. These techniques form a framework for evaluating LLMs, aiming to enhance transparency, guide development, and establish user trust. Future papers will describe metric visualization and demonstrate each approach on practical examples.
6/5/2024
š
MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark
Dongping Chen, Ruoxi Chen, Shilin Zhang, Yinuo Liu, Yaochen Wang, Huichi Zhou, Qihui Zhang, Yao Wan, Pan Zhou, Lichao Sun
0
0
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained significant attention recently, showing remarkable potential in artificial general intelligence. However, assessing the utility of MLLMs presents considerable challenges, primarily due to the absence of multimodal benchmarks that align with human preferences. Drawing inspiration from the concept of LLM-as-a-Judge within LLMs, this paper introduces a novel benchmark, termed MLLM-as-a-Judge, to assess the ability of MLLMs in assisting judges across diverse modalities, encompassing three distinct tasks: Scoring Evaluation, Pair Comparison, and Batch Ranking. Our study reveals that, while MLLMs demonstrate remarkable human-like discernment in Pair Comparison, there is a significant divergence from human preferences in Scoring Evaluation and Batch Ranking. Furthermore, a closer examination reveals persistent challenges in the judgment capacities of LLMs, including diverse biases, hallucinatory responses, and inconsistencies in judgment, even in advanced models such as GPT-4V. These findings emphasize the pressing need for enhancements and further research efforts to be undertaken before regarding MLLMs as fully reliable evaluators. In light of this, we advocate for additional efforts dedicated to supporting the continuous development within the domain of MLLM functioning as judges. The code and dataset are publicly available at our project homepage: url{https://mllm-judge.github.io/}.
6/12/2024