MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- MMAU is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) agents across diverse domains.
- It assesses a wide range of skills, including language understanding, reasoning, and multimodal processing.
- The benchmark aims to provide a holistic assessment of an agent's overall intelligence and problem-solving abilities.
Plain English Explanation
The MMAU benchmark is designed to thoroughly test the capabilities of AI systems. It covers a broad range of skills, such as understanding natural language, making logical inferences, and integrating information from multiple sources like text, images, and audio.
The goal is to gain a comprehensive understanding of an AI agent's overall intelligence and problem-solving skills, rather than just focusing on narrow, specialized tasks. By assessing a wide variety of capabilities, the benchmark can help identify the strengths and weaknesses of different AI systems and guide future development efforts.
Technical Explanation
The MMAU benchmark consists of a diverse set of tasks spanning language understanding, reasoning, and multimodal processing. These tasks are drawn from various domains, including common sense reasoning, visual understanding, and question answering.
The benchmark is designed to be challenging and broad, testing an agent's ability to generalize its knowledge and skills across different contexts. It includes tasks that require the integration of information from multiple modalities, such as combining text and images to answer questions.
By evaluating agents on this comprehensive set of capabilities, the researchers aim to gain a more holistic understanding of their overall intelligence and problem-solving abilities.
Critical Analysis
The MMAU benchmark represents a significant step forward in the assessment of AI systems, moving beyond narrow, specialized tasks to a more holistic evaluation. However, the paper acknowledges that the benchmark still has limitations and areas for further development.
For example, the tasks included in the benchmark may not fully capture the nuances and complexities of real-world problem-solving, which often involves dynamic, open-ended scenarios. Additionally, the benchmark may not be sensitive enough to detect more subtle differences in the capabilities of high-performing AI agents.
Further research is needed to explore the generalization of the benchmark to new domains and the potential for adaptive, personalized assessments that can capture the unique strengths and weaknesses of individual AI systems.
Conclusion
The MMAU benchmark represents an important advancement in the evaluation of AI systems, providing a comprehensive and challenging assessment of agents' capabilities across diverse domains. By testing a wide range of skills, the benchmark offers a more holistic understanding of an agent's intelligence and problem-solving abilities.
While the benchmark has limitations and areas for further development, it lays the groundwork for more robust and meaningful assessments of AI systems. As the field of AI continues to evolve, tools like MMAU will be crucial for guiding the development of increasingly capable and versatile agents that can tackle complex, real-world challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains
Guoli Yin, Haoping Bai, Shuang Ma, Feng Nan, Yanchao Sun, Zhaoyang Xu, Shen Ma, Jiarui Lu, Xiang Kong, Aonan Zhang, Dian Ang Yap, Yizhe zhang, Karsten Ahnert, Vik Kamath, Mathias Berglund, Dominic Walsh, Tobias Gindele, Juergen Wiest, Zhengfeng Lai, Xiaoming Wang, Jiulong Shan, Meng Cao, Ruoming Pang, Zirui Wang
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have increased the demand for comprehensive benchmarks to evaluate their capabilities as human-like agents. Existing benchmarks, while useful, often focus on specific application scenarios, emphasizing task completion but failing to dissect the underlying skills that drive these outcomes. This lack of granularity makes it difficult to deeply discern where failures stem from. Additionally, setting up these environments requires considerable effort, and issues of unreliability and reproducibility sometimes arise, especially in interactive tasks. To address these limitations, we introduce the Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark, featuring comprehensive offline tasks that eliminate the need for complex environment setups. It evaluates models across five domains, including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics, and covers five essential capabilities: Understanding, Reasoning, Planning, Problem-solving, and Self-correction. With a total of 20 meticulously designed tasks encompassing over 3K distinct prompts, MMAU provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the strengths and limitations of LLM agents. By testing 18 representative models on MMAU, we provide deep and insightful analyses. Ultimately, MMAU not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also enhances the interpretability of their performance. Datasets and evaluation scripts of MMAU are released at https://github.com/apple/axlearn/tree/main/docs/research/mmau.
Read more8/19/2024
🤔
0
MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI
Xiang Yue, Yuansheng Ni, Kai Zhang, Tianyu Zheng, Ruoqi Liu, Ge Zhang, Samuel Stevens, Dongfu Jiang, Weiming Ren, Yuxuan Sun, Cong Wei, Botao Yu, Ruibin Yuan, Renliang Sun, Ming Yin, Boyuan Zheng, Zhenzhu Yang, Yibo Liu, Wenhao Huang, Huan Sun, Yu Su, Wenhu Chen
We introduce MMMU: a new benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on massive multi-discipline tasks demanding college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. MMMU includes 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering. These questions span 30 subjects and 183 subfields, comprising 30 highly heterogeneous image types, such as charts, diagrams, maps, tables, music sheets, and chemical structures. Unlike existing benchmarks, MMMU focuses on advanced perception and reasoning with domain-specific knowledge, challenging models to perform tasks akin to those faced by experts. The evaluation of 14 open-source LMMs as well as the proprietary GPT-4V(ision) and Gemini highlights the substantial challenges posed by MMMU. Even the advanced GPT-4V and Gemini Ultra only achieve accuracies of 56% and 59% respectively, indicating significant room for improvement. We believe MMMU will stimulate the community to build next-generation multimodal foundation models towards expert artificial general intelligence.
Read more6/14/2024
🤖
0
New!A Survey on Multimodal Benchmarks: In the Era of Large AI Models
Lin Li, Guikun Chen, Hanrong Shi, Jun Xiao, Long Chen
The rapid evolution of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has brought substantial advancements in artificial intelligence, significantly enhancing the capability to understand and generate multimodal content. While prior studies have largely concentrated on model architectures and training methodologies, a thorough analysis of the benchmarks used for evaluating these models remains underexplored. This survey addresses this gap by systematically reviewing 211 benchmarks that assess MLLMs across four core domains: understanding, reasoning, generation, and application. We provide a detailed analysis of task designs, evaluation metrics, and dataset constructions, across diverse modalities. We hope that this survey will contribute to the ongoing advancement of MLLM research by offering a comprehensive overview of benchmarking practices and identifying promising directions for future work. An associated GitHub repository collecting the latest papers is available.
Read more9/30/2024
0
MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark
Yubo Wang, Xueguang Ma, Ge Zhang, Yuansheng Ni, Abhranil Chandra, Shiguang Guo, Weiming Ren, Aaran Arulraj, Xuan He, Ziyan Jiang, Tianle Li, Max Ku, Kai Wang, Alex Zhuang, Rongqi Fan, Xiang Yue, Wenhu Chen
In the age of large-scale language models, benchmarks like the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) have been pivotal in pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve in language comprehension and reasoning across diverse domains. However, as models continue to improve, their performance on these benchmarks has begun to plateau, making it increasingly difficult to discern differences in model capabilities. This paper introduces MMLU-Pro, an enhanced dataset designed to extend the mostly knowledge-driven MMLU benchmark by integrating more challenging, reasoning-focused questions and expanding the choice set from four to ten options. Additionally, MMLU-Pro eliminates the trivial and noisy questions in MMLU. Our experimental results show that MMLU-Pro not only raises the challenge, causing a significant drop in accuracy by 16% to 33% compared to MMLU but also demonstrates greater stability under varying prompts. With 24 different prompt styles tested, the sensitivity of model scores to prompt variations decreased from 4-5% in MMLU to just 2% in MMLU-Pro. Additionally, we found that models utilizing Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning achieved better performance on MMLU-Pro compared to direct answering, which is in stark contrast to the findings on the original MMLU, indicating that MMLU-Pro includes more complex reasoning questions. Our assessments confirm that MMLU-Pro is a more discriminative benchmark to better track progress in the field.
Read more6/26/2024