A Survey on Multimodal Benchmarks: In the Era of Large AI Models

Overview

• Rapid evolution of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has significantly enhanced AI capabilities for understanding and generating multimodal content.
• Prior studies have focused on model architectures and training methodologies, but a thorough analysis of benchmarks used for evaluating these models remains underexplored.
• This survey addresses this gap by systematically reviewing 211 benchmarks that assess MLLMs across four core domains: understanding, reasoning, generation, and application.
• The survey provides a detailed analysis of task designs, evaluation metrics, and dataset constructions across diverse modalities.
• The aim is to contribute to the advancement of MLLM research by offering a comprehensive overview of benchmarking practices and identifying promising directions for future work.

Plain English Explanation

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are a type of artificial intelligence (AI) system that can understand and generate content across multiple forms of media, such as text, images, and audio. These models have rapidly improved in recent years, significantly enhancing AI's capabilities in this area.

While previous research has focused on the technical details of how these models are designed and trained, this survey takes a step back to examine the benchmarks, or tests, that are used to evaluate the performance of MLLMs. The researchers systematically reviewed 211 different benchmarks that assess MLLMs in four key areas: understanding (how well the models can comprehend multimodal information), reasoning (how well they can draw insights and make decisions), generation (how well they can create new multimodal content), and application (how well they can be used in real-world tasks).

By analyzing these benchmarks in detail, the researchers hope to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of MLLM evaluation and identify promising directions for future research and development in this field. This information could help drive further advancements in multimodal AI and its applications.

Technical Explanation

The survey begins by reviewing the rapid progress of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), which have significantly enhanced the ability of artificial intelligence systems to understand and generate content across multiple modalities, such as text, images, and audio.

While previous studies have primarily focused on the model architectures and training methodologies of these models, the researchers identified a gap in the thorough analysis of the benchmarks used to evaluate MLLM performance.

To address this, the survey systematically reviewed 211 benchmarks that assess MLLMs across four core domains: understanding, reasoning, generation, and application. For each benchmark, the researchers analyzed the task designs, evaluation metrics, and dataset constructions, considering the diverse modalities involved.

The aim of this comprehensive survey is to contribute to the ongoing advancement of MLLM research by providing a thorough overview of current benchmarking practices and identifying promising directions for future work in this rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence.

Critical Analysis

The survey provides a valuable and comprehensive review of the current state of benchmarking practices for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). By systematically analyzing 211 benchmarks across four core domains, the researchers offer a detailed and objective assessment of the various task designs, evaluation metrics, and dataset constructions used to assess MLLM performance.

One potential limitation of the survey is that it does not delve deeply into the specific strengths and weaknesses of individual benchmarks or the implications of the observed trends. While the researchers identify promising directions for future research, they could have provided more critical analysis or recommendations for improving benchmark design and evaluation.

Additionally, the survey focuses primarily on the technical aspects of MLLM benchmarking, without exploring the broader societal implications or potential biases inherent in the benchmarks and datasets used. Considering the growing importance of these models in real-world applications, a more holistic evaluation that considers ethical and fairness concerns would be a valuable addition to this research.

Overall, this survey represents a significant contribution to the understanding of MLLM benchmarking practices and lays the groundwork for further advancements in the field. By encouraging readers to think critically about the research and its limitations, the survey could inspire more in-depth investigations and discussions around the development and deployment of these powerful AI systems.

Conclusion

This comprehensive survey on Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) benchmarking practices offers a valuable overview of the current state of the field. By systematically reviewing 211 benchmarks across four core domains, the researchers provide insight into the task designs, evaluation metrics, and dataset constructions used to assess the performance of these rapidly evolving AI models.

The survey's findings contribute to the ongoing advancement of MLLM research by highlighting promising directions for future work, such as exploring more diverse modalities and real-world applications. Additionally, the critical analysis encourages readers to think deeply about the limitations and potential biases inherent in the benchmarking processes, which is crucial as these models become increasingly integrated into various aspects of society.

Overall, this survey represents an important step in understanding the current state of MLLM evaluation and lays the foundation for further research and development in this rapidly progressing field of artificial intelligence.