Modeling the Data-Generating Process is Necessary for Out-of-Distribution Generalization
2206.07837
0
0
🌿
Abstract
Recent empirical studies on domain generalization (DG) have shown that DG algorithms that perform well on some distribution shifts fail on others, and no state-of-the-art DG algorithm performs consistently well on all shifts. Moreover, real-world data often has multiple distribution shifts over different attributes; hence we introduce multi-attribute distribution shift datasets and find that the accuracy of existing DG algorithms falls even further. To explain these results, we provide a formal characterization of generalization under multi-attribute shifts using a canonical causal graph. Based on the relationship between spurious attributes and the classification label, we obtain realizations of the canonical causal graph that characterize common distribution shifts and show that each shift entails different independence constraints over observed variables. As a result, we prove that any algorithm based on a single, fixed constraint cannot work well across all shifts, providing theoretical evidence for mixed empirical results on DG algorithms. Based on this insight, we develop Causally Adaptive Constraint Minimization (CACM), an algorithm that uses knowledge about the data-generating process to adaptively identify and apply the correct independence constraints for regularization. Results on fully synthetic, MNIST, small NORB, and Waterbirds datasets, covering binary and multi-valued attributes and labels, show that adaptive dataset-dependent constraints lead to the highest accuracy on unseen domains whereas incorrect constraints fail to do so. Our results demonstrate the importance of modeling the causal relationships inherent in the data-generating process.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Recent studies have shown that domain generalization (DG) algorithms that perform well on some distribution shifts fail on others, and no state-of-the-art DG algorithm consistently performs well across all shifts.
- Real-world data often has multiple distribution shifts over different attributes, leading to further declines in the accuracy of existing DG algorithms.
- The paper provides a formal characterization of generalization under multi-attribute shifts using a canonical causal graph, and develops an algorithm called Causally Adaptive Constraint Minimization (CACM) that adapts the independence constraints used for regularization based on the data-generating process.
Plain English Explanation
Domain generalization (DG) is the ability of machine learning models to perform well on data from new, previously unseen distributions or "domains." Towards Counterfactual Fairness-Aware Domain Generalization and other recent studies have found that current DG algorithms struggle to generalize consistently across different types of distribution shifts.
In the real world, data often has multiple distribution shifts across various attributes, such as the background, object color, or lighting conditions in an image. The paper shows that existing DG algorithms perform even worse when faced with these "multi-attribute" shifts, as they are unable to adapt to the different independence constraints required for each type of shift.
To understand this, the researchers use a causal graph to model the relationships between the input attributes, the classification label, and any spurious correlations. They find that different distribution shifts correspond to different independence constraints that must be satisfied for good generalization. Since no single, fixed constraint can handle all shifts, existing DG algorithms inevitably perform poorly on some domains.
To address this, the paper introduces CACM, an algorithm that adaptively identifies and applies the correct independence constraints for each data distribution based on the causal structure. This allows CACM to achieve higher accuracy on unseen domains compared to prior DG methods.
Technical Explanation
The paper starts by empirically demonstrating the limitations of current domain generalization (DG) algorithms. Through experiments on fully synthetic datasets as well as standard benchmarks like MNIST and Waterbirds, the authors show that state-of-the-art DG methods that perform well on some distribution shifts fail on others. They attribute this to the fact that real-world data often has multiple distribution shifts across different attributes, which existing algorithms are unable to handle.
To explain these findings, the researchers provide a formal characterization of generalization under multi-attribute distribution shifts using a canonical causal graph. This graph models the relationships between the input features, the classification label, and any spurious correlations that may exist in the data. By analyzing the different independence constraints implied by various types of distribution shifts, the authors prove that no single, fixed constraint can work well across all shifts.
Based on this insight, the paper introduces Causally Adaptive Constraint Minimization (CACM), an algorithm that uses knowledge about the data-generating process to adaptively identify and apply the correct independence constraints for regularization. CACM outperforms prior DG methods on a range of datasets, including those with binary and multi-valued attributes and labels, by better accounting for the causal structure underlying the distribution shifts.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting the limitations of existing domain generalization (DG) algorithms in the face of real-world data with multiple distribution shifts. The formal causal analysis provides a principled framework for understanding the challenges of DG and the need for adaptive, data-driven approaches.
One potential limitation of the work is the reliance on synthetic datasets and relatively simple benchmarks like MNIST and Waterbirds. While these serve as useful testbeds, it would be important to evaluate the proposed CACM algorithm on more complex, real-world datasets to assess its practical applicability and scalability.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the computational complexity and training time of CACM compared to other DG methods. This information would be useful for understanding the practicality of deploying the algorithm in resource-constrained environments or at scale.
Further research could also explore ways to automatically infer the causal structure of the data-generating process, as the current approach assumes this knowledge is available. Developing robust methods for causal discovery and modeling in the context of DG would broaden the applicability of the proposed techniques.
Conclusion
This paper makes a significant contribution to the field of domain generalization by demonstrating the limitations of existing algorithms in the face of multi-attribute distribution shifts, and proposing a novel approach called Causally Adaptive Constraint Minimization (CACM) that adapts the regularization constraints based on the underlying causal structure of the data.
The formal causal analysis and the CACM algorithm provide a principled framework for addressing the challenges of domain generalization, which is a critical requirement for deploying machine learning models in the real world. By better accounting for the complex relationships between input attributes and the target label, CACM shows promising results and highlights the importance of modeling the data-generating process for achieving robust and generalizable machine learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
From Identifiable Causal Representations to Controllable Counterfactual Generation: A Survey on Causal Generative Modeling
Aneesh Komanduri, Xintao Wu, Yongkai Wu, Feng Chen
0
0
Deep generative models have shown tremendous capability in data density estimation and data generation from finite samples. While these models have shown impressive performance by learning correlations among features in the data, some fundamental shortcomings are their lack of explainability, tendency to induce spurious correlations, and poor out-of-distribution extrapolation. To remedy such challenges, recent work has proposed a shift toward causal generative models. Causal models offer several beneficial properties to deep generative models, such as distribution shift robustness, fairness, and interpretability. Structural causal models (SCMs) describe data-generating processes and model complex causal relationships and mechanisms among variables in a system. Thus, SCMs can naturally be combined with deep generative models. We provide a technical survey on causal generative modeling categorized into causal representation learning and controllable counterfactual generation methods. We focus on fundamental theory, methodology, drawbacks, datasets, and metrics. Then, we cover applications of causal generative models in fairness, privacy, out-of-distribution generalization, precision medicine, and biological sciences. Lastly, we discuss open problems and fruitful research directions for future work in the field.
5/24/2024
📉
Towards Counterfactual Fairness-aware Domain Generalization in Changing Environments
Yujie Lin, Chen Zhao, Minglai Shao, Baoluo Meng, Xujiang Zhao, Haifeng Chen
0
0
Recognizing the prevalence of domain shift as a common challenge in machine learning, various domain generalization (DG) techniques have been developed to enhance the performance of machine learning systems when dealing with out-of-distribution (OOD) data. Furthermore, in real-world scenarios, data distributions can gradually change across a sequence of sequential domains. While current methodologies primarily focus on improving model effectiveness within these new domains, they often overlook fairness issues throughout the learning process. In response, we introduce an innovative framework called Counterfactual Fairness-Aware Domain Generalization with Sequential Autoencoder (CDSAE). This approach effectively separates environmental information and sensitive attributes from the embedded representation of classification features. This concurrent separation not only greatly improves model generalization across diverse and unfamiliar domains but also effectively addresses challenges related to unfair classification. Our strategy is rooted in the principles of causal inference to tackle these dual issues. To examine the intricate relationship between semantic information, sensitive attributes, and environmental cues, we systematically categorize exogenous uncertainty factors into four latent variables: 1) semantic information influenced by sensitive attributes, 2) semantic information unaffected by sensitive attributes, 3) environmental cues influenced by sensitive attributes, and 4) environmental cues unaffected by sensitive attributes. By incorporating fairness regularization, we exclusively employ semantic information for classification purposes. Empirical validation on synthetic and real-world datasets substantiates the effectiveness of our approach, demonstrating improved accuracy levels while ensuring the preservation of fairness in the evolving landscape of continuous domains.
5/7/2024
💬
On the Need of a Modeling Language for Distribution Shifts: Illustrations on Tabular Datasets
Jiashuo Liu, Tianyu Wang, Peng Cui, Hongseok Namkoong
0
0
Different distribution shifts require different interventions, and algorithms must be grounded in the specific shifts they address. However, methodological development for ''robust'' methods typically relies on structural assumptions that lack empirical validation. Advocating for an empirically grounded inductive approach to research, we build an empirical testbed comprising natural shifts across 5 tabular datasets and 60,000 method configurations encompassing imbalanced learning methods and distributionally robust optimization (DRO) methods. We find $Y|X$-shifts are most prevalent on our testbed, in stark contrast to the heavy focus on $X$ (covariate)-shifts in the ML literature. The performance of ''robust'' methods varies significantly over shift types, and is no better than that of vanilla methods. To understand why, we conduct an in-depth empirical analysis of DRO methods and find that although often neglected by researchers, implementation details -- such as the choice of underlying model class (e.g., XGBoost) and hyperparameter selection -- have a bigger impact on performance than the ambiguity set or its radius. To further bridge that gap between methodological research and practice, we design case studies that illustrate how such a refined, inductive understanding of distribution shifts can enhance both data-centric and algorithmic interventions.
6/26/2024
Causal Representation Learning from Multiple Distributions: A General Setting
Kun Zhang, Shaoan Xie, Ignavier Ng, Yujia Zheng
0
0
In many problems, the measured variables (e.g., image pixels) are just mathematical functions of the hidden causal variables (e.g., the underlying concepts or objects). For the purpose of making predictions in changing environments or making proper changes to the system, it is helpful to recover the hidden causal variables $Z_i$ and their causal relations represented by graph $mathcal{G}_Z$. This problem has recently been known as causal representation learning. This paper is concerned with a general, completely nonparametric setting of causal representation learning from multiple distributions (arising from heterogeneous data or nonstationary time series), without assuming hard interventions behind distribution changes. We aim to develop general solutions in this fundamental case; as a by product, this helps see the unique benefit offered by other assumptions such as parametric causal models or hard interventions. We show that under the sparsity constraint on the recovered graph over the latent variables and suitable sufficient change conditions on the causal influences, interestingly, one can recover the moralized graph of the underlying directed acyclic graph, and the recovered latent variables and their relations are related to the underlying causal model in a specific, nontrivial way. In some cases, each latent variable can even be recovered up to component-wise transformations. Experimental results verify our theoretical claims.
4/11/2024