Modular, Hierarchical Machine Learning for Sequential Goal Completion

Overview

• This paper presents a modular, hierarchical machine learning (ML) framework that combines two emerging techniques: cognitive map learners (CML) and hyperdimensional computing (HDC).
• The framework is designed to address the limitations of a monolithic artificial neural network (ANN) approach, which requires significant retraining when the sequence or goals of a task change.
• The modular CML-HDC architecture allows for independent optimization of individual components and arbitrary reconfiguration, enabling a more traditional engineering approach to ML.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a new way to build machine learning systems that can adapt to changing tasks or goals without having to be completely retrained from scratch. Instead of using a single, large neural network, this approach uses a modular, hierarchical system that can be more easily reconfigured.

Imagine you have a robot that needs to complete a sequence of tasks in a maze, such as picking up a key, unlocking a door, and then unlocking a treasure chest. A typical machine learning approach would use a single, monolithic neural network to handle all of these tasks. However, if the sequence of tasks or the tasks themselves change, the entire neural network would need to be retrained, which can be very time-consuming and inefficient.

The modular framework described in this paper uses two key techniques to address this issue:

1. Cognitive map learners (CMLs): These are collections of three small neural networks that collaborate to learn the topology of the maze and the locations of objects within it. Each CML can be trained independently, making it easier to update when the environment changes.

2. Hyperdimensional computing (HDC): This is a type of machine learning that represents information using high-dimensional vectors, which can be combined using simple algebraic operations. This allows the system to reason about the sequence of tasks in a more flexible and efficient way.

By combining CMLs and HDC, the researchers were able to create a modular system that could solve sequential goal tasks in a maze. Importantly, if the goals or the sequence of tasks changed, the system could be easily reconfigured by making local changes to the CML-HDC architecture, rather than having to retrain the entire system from scratch.

This approach is more akin to traditional engineering practices, where complex systems are built by assembling smaller, independently developed components. The researchers argue that this could lead to more robust and adaptable machine learning systems in the future.

Technical Explanation

The researchers constructed two CMLs: one to represent the 2D physical space of the maze, and another to represent the relative distribution of objects in that space. Each CML is a collection of three single-layer ANNs (matrices) that are collaboratively trained to learn the topology of an abstract graph.

The state of each CML node was then encoded as a high-dimensional vector, allowing the researchers to use HDC for symbolic reasoning over these representations. This enabled the researchers to describe each sub-goal (e.g., pick up the key, unlock the door, unlock the treasure chest) using algebraic equations of the CML node states.

Multiple, independently trained CMLs were then assembled together to solve the sequential goal task in the maze. Importantly, changes to the goals required only localized changes in the CML-HDC architecture, rather than a global retraining of a monolithic ANN.

This modular, hierarchical approach allows for independent optimization of the individual components (task-agnostic) and arbitrary reconfiguration of the CML-HDC architecture, enabling a more traditional engineering approach to ML, similar to digital logic design.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their framework is still a proof-of-concept and requires further development and testing to assess its scalability and real-world applicability. For example, the experiments were conducted in a simulated environment, and it's unclear how well the framework would perform in more complex, dynamic real-world scenarios.

Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed comparison of the CML-HDC approach to other modular or hierarchical ML architectures, such as heterogeneous knowledge-augmented modular reinforcement learning or RoboMPDollar2Dollar, a robotic multimodal perception and planning framework. Such a comparison could help better situate the strengths and limitations of the proposed framework.

Finally, the paper does not address the potential computational and memory overhead associated with the high-dimensional vector representations used in the HDC component. As the complexity of tasks and environments increases, the scalability of the HDC approach may become a concern that requires further investigation.

Conclusion

This paper presents a promising modular, hierarchical ML framework that combines CMLs and HDC to address the limitations of monolithic ANN approaches. By enabling independent optimization and arbitrary reconfiguration of its components, the framework offers a more traditional engineering-like approach to building adaptable machine learning systems.

While the proof-of-concept results are encouraging, further research is needed to assess the framework's scalability, real-world applicability, and performance compared to other modular or hierarchical ML architectures. Addressing the potential computational and memory challenges associated with HDC will also be an important area of investigation as the framework is further developed and deployed in more complex domains.