Moving Sampling Physics-informed Neural Networks induced by Moving Mesh PDE

Read original: arXiv:2311.16167 - Published 6/11/2024 by Yu Yang, Qihong Yang, Yangtao Deng, Qiaolin He
Total Score

0

Moving Sampling Physics-informed Neural Networks induced by Moving Mesh PDE

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces a novel neural network architecture called MMPDE-Net that combines the moving mesh method with physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solving partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Proposes a "moving sampling" approach to enhance the performance of PINNs by adaptively adjusting the sampling locations during training
  • Demonstrates the effectiveness of the MMPDE-Net and moving sampling approach on several benchmark PDE problems

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way to solve complicated mathematical equations called partial differential equations (PDEs) using a type of artificial intelligence called neural networks. PDEs are used to model many real-world phenomena, like the flow of fluids or the spread of heat, but they can be very difficult to solve, especially for complex problems.

The key idea is to combine two important techniques - the "moving mesh method" and "physics-informed neural networks" (PINNs). The moving mesh method adaptively changes the spatial points where the equation is evaluated, allowing it to focus on the most important regions. PINNs are a type of neural network that incorporates the underlying physics of the problem directly into the network, which can help it learn to solve the PDE more accurately.

The researchers call their new approach "MMPDE-Net" - it takes advantage of both the moving mesh method and PINNs to solve PDEs more effectively. They also introduce a "moving sampling" technique, which dynamically adjusts where the neural network samples the PDE during training, further improving its performance.

The paper demonstrates that MMPDE-Net and moving sampling can outperform standard PINN approaches on several benchmark PDE problems, suggesting this could be a promising new way to tackle challenging physics and engineering problems using AI.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel neural network architecture called MMPDE-Net that combines the moving mesh method with physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solving partial differential equations (PDEs).

The key components of MMPDE-Net are:

  1. Moving Mesh Method: This adaptively changes the spatial points where the PDE is evaluated, allowing the method to focus on the most important regions of the problem domain. This is accomplished by solving an auxiliary "moving mesh PDE" (MMPDE) that determines how the mesh should evolve.

  2. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs): PINNs incorporate the underlying physics of the PDE directly into the neural network architecture, which can significantly improve their ability to learn accurate solutions.

The paper also proposes a "moving sampling" approach that dynamically adjusts the locations where the PINN samples the PDE during training. This allows the network to focus on the most important regions of the problem domain, further enhancing its performance.

The authors evaluate MMPDE-Net and the moving sampling technique on several benchmark PDE problems, including the Burgers' equation, Allen-Cahn equation, and Poisson equation. They demonstrate that MMPDE-Net outperforms standard PINN approaches, as well as other recent methods like sampled neural networks and region-optimized PINNs (ROPINNs).

Critical Analysis

The paper introduces a promising new approach for solving PDEs using a combination of the moving mesh method and PINNs. The authors provide a thorough evaluation of MMPDE-Net on several benchmark problems, demonstrating its superior performance compared to other state-of-the-art methods.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or areas for further research:

  1. Computational Complexity: The moving mesh method and the additional MMPDE solver may increase the computational overhead compared to standard PINN approaches. The authors do not provide a detailed analysis of the computational cost or runtime of MMPDE-Net.

  2. Generalization to More Complex PDEs: The benchmark problems considered in the paper are relatively simple. It would be valuable to see how MMPDE-Net performs on more complex, real-world PDE problems, such as those involving multi-physics or highly nonlinear dynamics.

  3. Sensitivity to Hyperparameters: The performance of MMPDE-Net may be sensitive to the choice of hyperparameters, such as the MMPDE parameters or the neural network architecture. The authors do not provide a thorough sensitivity analysis or guidelines for tuning these hyperparameters.

  4. Comparison to Adaptive Sampling Techniques: While the moving sampling approach is a novel contribution, there may be other adaptive sampling techniques that could be combined with PINNs to improve their performance. A more comprehensive comparison to such methods would be helpful.

Overall, the MMPDE-Net and moving sampling approach presented in the paper are compelling and show promise for improving the performance of PINNs in solving PDEs. Further research addressing the identified limitations and exploring the method's applicability to more complex real-world problems would be valuable.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel neural network architecture called MMPDE-Net that combines the moving mesh method with physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). The key innovations are the integration of the moving mesh method to adaptively focus on important regions of the problem domain, and the "moving sampling" technique that dynamically adjusts the sampling locations during PINN training.

The authors demonstrate that MMPDE-Net outperforms standard PINN approaches and other recent methods on several benchmark PDE problems, suggesting this could be a promising new way to tackle challenging physics and engineering problems using AI. While the paper does not address some potential limitations, it represents an important contribution to the field of physics-informed machine learning and opens up new avenues for further research and development.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Moving Sampling Physics-informed Neural Networks induced by Moving Mesh PDE
Total Score

0

Moving Sampling Physics-informed Neural Networks induced by Moving Mesh PDE

Yu Yang, Qihong Yang, Yangtao Deng, Qiaolin He

In this work, we propose an end-to-end adaptive sampling neural network (MMPDE-Net) based on the moving mesh method, which can adaptively generate new sampling points by solving the moving mesh PDE. This model focuses on improving the quality of sampling points generation. Moreover, we develop an iterative algorithm based on MMPDE-Net, which makes the sampling points more precise and controllable. Since MMPDE-Net is a framework independent of the deep learning solver, we combine it with physics-informed neural networks (PINN) to propose moving sampling PINN (MS-PINN) and demonstrate its effectiveness by error analysis under some assumptions. Finally, we demonstrate the performance improvement of MS-PINN compared to PINN through numerical experiments of four typical examples, which numerically verify the effectiveness of our method.

Read more

6/11/2024

Dynamical Measure Transport and Neural PDE Solvers for Sampling
Total Score

0

Dynamical Measure Transport and Neural PDE Solvers for Sampling

Jingtong Sun, Julius Berner, Lorenz Richter, Marius Zeinhofer, Johannes Muller, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Anima Anandkumar

The task of sampling from a probability density can be approached as transporting a tractable density function to the target, known as dynamical measure transport. In this work, we tackle it through a principled unified framework using deterministic or stochastic evolutions described by partial differential equations (PDEs). This framework incorporates prior trajectory-based sampling methods, such as diffusion models or Schrodinger bridges, without relying on the concept of time-reversals. Moreover, it allows us to propose novel numerical methods for solving the transport task and thus sampling from complicated targets without the need for the normalization constant or data samples. We employ physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to approximate the respective PDE solutions, implying both conceptional and computational advantages. In particular, PINNs allow for simulation- and discretization-free optimization and can be trained very efficiently, leading to significantly better mode coverage in the sampling task compared to alternative methods. Moreover, they can readily be fine-tuned with Gauss-Newton methods to achieve high accuracy in sampling.

Read more

7/11/2024

A Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) Methodology for Coupled Moving Boundary PDEs
Total Score

0

A Physics Informed Neural Network (PINN) Methodology for Coupled Moving Boundary PDEs

Shivprasad Kathane (Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Mumbai India), Shyamprasad Karagadde (Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Mumbai India)

Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) is a novel multi-task learning framework useful for solving physical problems modeled using differential equations (DEs) by integrating the knowledge of physics and known constraints into the components of deep learning. A large class of physical problems in materials science and mechanics involve moving boundaries, where interface flux balance conditions are to be satisfied while solving DEs. Examples of such systems include free surface flows, shock propagation, solidification of pure and alloy systems etc. While recent research works have explored applicability of PINNs for an uncoupled system (such as solidification of pure system), the present work reports a PINN-based approach to solve coupled systems involving multiple governing parameters (energy and species, along with multiple interface balance equations). This methodology employs an architecture consisting of a separate network for each variable with a separate treatment of each phase, a training strategy which alternates between temporal learning and adaptive loss weighting, and a scheme which progressively reduces the optimisation space. While solving the benchmark problem of binary alloy solidification, it is distinctly successful at capturing the complex composition profile, which has a characteristic discontinuity at the interface and the resulting predictions align well with the analytical solutions. The procedure can be generalised for solving other transient multiphysics problems especially in the low-data regime and in cases where measurements can reveal new physics.

Read more

9/18/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

CP-PINNs: Data-Driven Changepoints Detection in PDEs Using Online Optimized Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Zhikang Dong, Pawel Polak

We investigate the inverse problem for Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) in scenarios where the parameters of the given PDE dynamics may exhibit changepoints at random time. We employ Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) - universal approximators capable of estimating the solution of any physical law described by a system of PDEs, which serves as a regularization during neural network training, restricting the space of admissible solutions and enhancing function approximation accuracy. We demonstrate that when the system exhibits sudden changes in the PDE dynamics, this regularization is either insufficient to accurately estimate the true dynamics, or it may result in model miscalibration and failure. Consequently, we propose a PINNs extension using a Total-Variation penalty, which allows to accommodate multiple changepoints in the PDE dynamics and significantly improves function approximation. These changepoints can occur at random locations over time and are estimated concurrently with the solutions. Additionally, we introduce an online learning method for re-weighting loss function terms dynamically. Through empirical analysis using examples of various equations with parameter changes, we showcase the advantages of our proposed model. In the absence of changepoints, the model reverts to the original PINNs model. However, when changepoints are present, our approach yields superior parameter estimation, improved model fitting, and reduced training error compared to the original PINNs model.

Read more

4/3/2024