MR-BEN: A Comprehensive Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper introduces Mr-Ben, a new meta-reasoning benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of large language models. • The benchmark aims to assess a model's ability to engage in higher-order reasoning, such as analyzing the soundness of arguments, identifying logical fallacies, and drawing inferences beyond the literal meaning of text. • The paper compares the performance of various large language models on the Mr-Ben benchmark and provides insights into their meta-reasoning capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new test called Mr-Ben that is designed to evaluate how well large language models can engage in advanced reasoning. Rather than just testing a model's ability to understand the literal meaning of text, Mr-Ben challenges the model to think critically and analytically about the information it is presented with.
For example, the test might ask the model to identify logical flaws in an argument or to draw conclusions that go beyond the explicit statements in a passage. This type of "meta-reasoning" - the ability to reason about reasoning itself - is an important capability for AI systems that aim to engage in more sophisticated and human-like interactions.
By testing various large language models on the Mr-Ben benchmark, the researchers were able to gain insights into the current state of meta-reasoning in AI. The results suggest that while these models have made impressive strides in natural language processing, they still have room for improvement when it comes to higher-order reasoning skills.
Technical Explanation
The Mr-Ben benchmark is designed to assess a model's ability to engage in meta-reasoning, which involves tasks like analyzing the logical validity of arguments, identifying fallacies, and drawing inferences that go beyond the literal meaning of text.
The benchmark includes a diverse set of task types, such as:
- Argument analysis: Determining the soundness and validity of arguments
- Fallacy identification: Spotting logical fallacies in statements
- Logical inference: Deriving conclusions from premise-conclusion pairs
- Hypothetical reasoning: Evaluating the implications of hypothetical scenarios
The researchers tested the performance of several large language models, including GPT-3, InstructGPT, and Chinchilla, on the Mr-Ben benchmark. They found that while the models performed well on some meta-reasoning tasks, they struggled with others, particularly those requiring deeper logical reasoning.
The results suggest that current large language models, while highly capable in many areas of natural language processing, still have significant room for improvement when it comes to more advanced reasoning abilities. The Mr-Ben benchmark provides a valuable tool for tracking progress in this important aspect of AI development.
Critical Analysis
The Mr-Ben benchmark represents a significant step forward in the evaluation of large language models' meta-reasoning capabilities. By testing a diverse range of reasoning tasks, the benchmark provides a more comprehensive assessment than previous approaches, which tended to focus on narrower subsets of reasoning skills.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the benchmark. For example, the tasks are still largely based on textual input and output, which may not fully capture the multi-modal reasoning abilities that could be important for real-world applications. Additionally, the benchmark focuses on logical and analytical reasoning, but there may be other important forms of meta-reasoning, such as moral reasoning or social cognition, that are not adequately addressed.
Furthermore, while the results suggest that current large language models have room for improvement in meta-reasoning, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific cognitive or architectural factors that might be constraining their performance. Exploring these underlying issues could help guide the development of more advanced reasoning capabilities in AI systems.
Overall, the Mr-Ben benchmark represents a valuable contribution to the field of AI research, but there is still much work to be done in understanding and advancing the meta-reasoning abilities of large language models.
Conclusion
The Mr-Ben benchmark provides a comprehensive assessment of the meta-reasoning capabilities of large language models, going beyond simple language understanding to evaluate their ability to engage in higher-order reasoning. The results suggest that while these models have made impressive strides, they still have significant room for improvement when it comes to logical analysis, hypothetical reasoning, and other meta-cognitive skills.
By introducing this benchmark and testing a range of large language models, the researchers have taken an important step towards better understanding the current state of AI reasoning abilities and identifying areas for future development. As the field of AI continues to advance, tools like Mr-Ben will be crucial for driving progress and ensuring that these systems can engage in the type of sophisticated, human-like reasoning that will be essential for their successful integration into our lives.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MR-BEN: A Comprehensive Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Models
Zhongshen Zeng, Yinhong Liu, Yingjia Wan, Jingyao Li, Pengguang Chen, Jianbo Dai, Yuxuan Yao, Rongwu Xu, Zehan Qi, Wanru Zhao, Linling Shen, Jianqiao Lu, Haochen Tan, Yukang Chen, Hao Zhang, Zhan Shi, Bailin Wang, Zhijiang Guo, Jiaya Jia
Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making, largely based on the step-by-step chain-of-thought reasoning processes. However, it has been increasingly challenging to evaluate the reasoning capability of LLMs. Concretely, existing outcome-based benchmarks begin to saturate and become less sufficient to monitor the progress. To this end, we present a process-based benchmark MR-BEN that demands a meta reasoning skill, where LMs are asked to locate and analyse potential errors in automatically generated reasoning steps. MR-BEN is a comprehensive benchmark comprising 5,975 questions collected from human experts, covering various subjects such as physics, chemistry, logic, coding, and more. Through our designed metrics for assessing meta-reasoning on this benchmark, we identify interesting limitations and weaknesses of current LLMs (open-source and closed-source models). For example, open-source models are seemingly comparable to GPT-4 on outcome-based benchmarks, but they lag far behind on our benchmark, revealing the underlying reasoning capability gap between them. Our dataset and codes are available on https://randolph-zeng.github.io/Mr-Ben.github.io/.
Read more6/21/2024
0
MR-GSM8K: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Model Evaluation
Zhongshen Zeng, Pengguang Chen, Shu Liu, Haiyun Jiang, Jiaya Jia
In this work, we introduce a novel evaluation paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs) that compels them to transition from a traditional question-answering role, akin to a student, to a solution-scoring role, akin to a teacher. This paradigm, focusing on reasoning about reasoning, hence termed meta-reasoning, shifts the emphasis from result-oriented assessments, which often neglect the reasoning process, to a more comprehensive evaluation that effectively distinguishes between the cognitive capabilities of different models. By applying this paradigm in the GSM8K dataset, we have developed the MR-GSM8K benchmark. Our extensive analysis includes several state-of-the-art models from both open-source and commercial domains, uncovering fundamental deficiencies in their training and evaluation methodologies. Notably, while models like Deepseek-v2 and Claude3-Sonnet closely competed with GPT-4 in GSM8K, their performance disparities expanded dramatically in MR-GSM8K, with differences widening to over 20 absolute points, underscoring the significant challenge posed by our meta-reasoning approach.
Read more6/6/2024
0
LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models
Mihir Parmar, Nisarg Patel, Neeraj Varshney, Mutsumi Nakamura, Man Luo, Santosh Mashetty, Arindam Mitra, Chitta Baral
Recently developed large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform remarkably well on a wide range of language understanding tasks. But, can they really reason over the natural language? This question has been receiving significant research attention and many reasoning skills such as commonsense, numerical, and qualitative have been studied. However, the crucial skill pertaining to 'logical reasoning' has remained underexplored. Existing work investigating this reasoning ability of LLMs has focused only on a couple of inference rules (such as modus ponens and modus tollens) of propositional and first-order logic. Addressing the above limitation, we comprehensively evaluate the logical reasoning ability of LLMs on 25 different reasoning patterns spanning over propositional, first-order, and non-monotonic logics. To enable systematic evaluation, we introduce LogicBench, a natural language question-answering dataset focusing on the use of a single inference rule. We conduct detailed analysis with a range of LLMs such as GPT-4, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama-2, and Mistral using chain-of-thought prompting. Experimental results show that existing LLMs do not fare well on LogicBench; especially, they struggle with instances involving complex reasoning and negations. Furthermore, they sometimes overlook contextual information necessary for reasoning to arrive at the correct conclusion. We believe that our work and findings facilitate future research for evaluating and enhancing the logical reasoning ability of LLMs. Data and code are available at https://github.com/Mihir3009/LogicBench.
Read more6/7/2024
0
MARS: Benchmarking the Metaphysical Reasoning Abilities of Language Models with a Multi-task Evaluation Dataset
Weiqi Wang, Yangqiu Song
To enable Large Language Models (LLMs) to function as conscious agents with generalizable reasoning capabilities, it is crucial that they possess the reasoning ability to comprehend situational changes (transitions) in distribution triggered by environmental factors or actions from other agents. Despite its fundamental significance, this ability remains underexplored due to the complexity of modeling infinite possible changes in an event and their associated distributions, coupled with the lack of benchmark data with situational transitions. Addressing these gaps, we propose a novel formulation of reasoning with distributional changes as a three-step discriminative process, termed as MetAphysical ReaSoning. We then introduce the first-ever benchmark, MARS, comprising three tasks corresponding to each step. These tasks systematically assess LLMs' capabilities in reasoning the plausibility of (i) changes in actions, (ii) states caused by changed actions, and (iii) situational transitions driven by changes in action. Extensive evaluations with 20 (L)LMs of varying sizes and methods indicate that all three tasks in this process pose significant challenges, even for state-of-the-art LLMs and LMs after fine-tuning. Further analyses reveal potential causes for the underperformance of LLMs and demonstrate that pre-training them on large-scale conceptualization taxonomies can potentially enhance their metaphysical reasoning capabilities. Our data and models are publicly accessible at https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/MARS.
Read more6/5/2024