MRScore: Evaluating Radiology Report Generation with LLM-based Reward System
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a novel evaluation metric called MRScore for assessing the quality of radiology report generation models
- MRScore uses a large language model-based reward system to evaluate the medical accuracy, linguistic fluency, and clinical relevance of generated reports
- Demonstrates that MRScore better correlates with human evaluation than existing automated metrics like BLEU and ROUGE
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to evaluate how well artificial intelligence (AI) models can generate radiology reports. Radiology reports are written summaries that doctors create after examining medical images like X-rays or MRIs. Generating high-quality radiology reports automatically using AI could save doctors time and improve patient care.
However, evaluating the quality of AI-generated radiology reports is challenging. The paper introduces a new metric called MRScore that aims to address this. MRScore uses a large language model, which is a powerful AI system trained on a vast amount of text data, to assess the medical accuracy, writing style, and clinical relevance of generated reports.
The authors show that MRScore better matches how humans judge the quality of radiology reports compared to existing automated evaluation metrics like BLEU and ROUGE. This suggests MRScore could be a more reliable way to evaluate and improve AI systems for generating radiology reports, which could have important implications for medical imaging and healthcare.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new evaluation metric called MRScore for assessing the quality of radiology report generation models. MRScore uses a large language model-based reward system to evaluate three key aspects of generated reports: medical accuracy, linguistic fluency, and clinical relevance.
To compute MRScore, the authors first fine-tune a large language model on a dataset of human-written radiology reports. This allows the model to learn the characteristics of high-quality medical reports. Then, they use this fine-tuned model to assign rewards to generated reports based on how similar they are to the human-written examples in terms of medical content, writing style, and clinical usefulness.
The authors demonstrate that MRScore has several advantages over existing automated evaluation metrics like BLEU and ROUGE. First, MRScore better correlates with human judgments of report quality compared to these other metrics. Second, MRScore provides more granular feedback by assessing different aspects of report quality separately. Finally, the authors show that MRScore can be used to guide the training of radiology report generation models and improve their performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the value of MRScore as a radiology report evaluation metric, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The authors only evaluate MRScore on a single radiology report dataset. Assessing its performance on a wider range of datasets would strengthen the claims about its generalizability.
-
The paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the types of errors or deficiencies in reports that MRScore is able to identify. Understanding these nuances could help guide the development of even more effective report generation systems.
-
The authors mention that MRScore could be useful for medical report grounding and differential testing of large language models, but they do not explore these applications in depth. Further research on these use cases could broaden the impact of MRScore.
Overall, the MRScore metric represents an important step forward in evaluating the quality of AI-generated radiology reports. With further development and validation, it could become a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working to improve medical imaging AI systems.
Conclusion
The MRScore evaluation metric proposed in this paper provides a more reliable and informative way to assess the quality of radiology report generation models compared to existing automated metrics. By using a large language model-based reward system to evaluate medical accuracy, linguistic fluency, and clinical relevance, MRScore better aligns with human judgments of report quality.
Adopting MRScore could lead to significant improvements in the development of AI systems for generating radiology reports, with potential benefits for radiologists, patients, and the broader healthcare system. The insights from this research also suggest that using large language models for specialized tasks like medical report evaluation may be a fruitful area for further exploration.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MRScore: Evaluating Radiology Report Generation with LLM-based Reward System
Yunyi Liu, Zhanyu Wang, Yingshu Li, Xinyu Liang, Lingqiao Liu, Lei Wang, Luping Zhou
In recent years, automated radiology report generation has experienced significant growth. This paper introduces MRScore, an automatic evaluation metric tailored for radiology report generation by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs). Conventional NLG (natural language generation) metrics like BLEU are inadequate for accurately assessing the generated radiology reports, as systematically demonstrated by our observations within this paper. To address this challenge, we collaborated with radiologists to develop a framework that guides LLMs for radiology report evaluation, ensuring alignment with human analysis. Our framework includes two key components: i) utilizing GPT to generate large amounts of training data, i.e., reports with different qualities, and ii) pairing GPT-generated reports as accepted and rejected samples and training LLMs to produce MRScore as the model reward. Our experiments demonstrate MRScore's higher correlation with human judgments and superior performance in model selection compared to traditional metrics. Our code and datasets will be available on GitHub.
Read more4/30/2024
0
X-ray Made Simple: Radiology Report Generation and Evaluation with Layman's Terms
Kun Zhao, Chenghao Xiao, Chen Tang, Bohao Yang, Kai Ye, Noura Al Moubayed, Liang Zhan, Chenghua Lin
Radiology Report Generation (RRG) has achieved significant progress with the advancements of multimodal generative models. However, the evaluation in the domain suffers from a lack of fair and robust metrics. We reveal that, high performance on RRG with existing lexical-based metrics (e.g. BLEU) might be more of a mirage - a model can get a high BLEU only by learning the template of reports. This has become an urgent problem for RRG due to the highly patternized nature of these reports. In this work, we un-intuitively approach this problem by proposing the Layman's RRG framework, a layman's terms-based dataset, evaluation and training framework that systematically improves RRG with day-to-day language. We first contribute the translated Layman's terms dataset. Building upon the dataset, we then propose a semantics-based evaluation method, which is proved to mitigate the inflated numbers of BLEU and provides fairer evaluation. Last, we show that training on the layman's terms dataset encourages models to focus on the semantics of the reports, as opposed to overfitting to learning the report templates. We reveal a promising scaling law between the number of training examples and semantics gain provided by our dataset, compared to the inverse pattern brought by the original formats. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/hegehongcha/LaymanRRG}.
Read more7/2/2024
0
The current status of large language models in summarizing radiology report impressions
Danqing Hu, Shanyuan Zhang, Qing Liu, Xiaofeng Zhu, Bing Liu
Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT show excellent capabilities in various natural language processing tasks, especially for text generation. The effectiveness of LLMs in summarizing radiology report impressions remains unclear. In this study, we explore the capability of eight LLMs on the radiology report impression summarization. Three types of radiology reports, i.e., CT, PET-CT, and Ultrasound reports, are collected from Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute. We use the report findings to construct the zero-shot, one-shot, and three-shot prompts with complete example reports to generate the impressions. Besides the automatic quantitative evaluation metrics, we define five human evaluation metrics, i.e., completeness, correctness, conciseness, verisimilitude, and replaceability, to evaluate the semantics of the generated impressions. Two thoracic surgeons (ZSY and LB) and one radiologist (LQ) compare the generated impressions with the reference impressions and score each impression under the five human evaluation metrics. Experimental results show that there is a gap between the generated impressions and reference impressions. Although the LLMs achieve comparable performance in completeness and correctness, the conciseness and verisimilitude scores are not very high. Using few-shot prompts can improve the LLMs' performance in conciseness and verisimilitude, but the clinicians still think the LLMs can not replace the radiologists in summarizing the radiology impressions.
Read more6/5/2024
💬
0
New!Language Models and Retrieval Augmented Generation for Automated Structured Data Extraction from Diagnostic Reports
Mohamed Sobhi Jabal, Pranav Warman, Jikai Zhang, Kartikeye Gupta, Ayush Jain, Maciej Mazurowski, Walter Wiggins, Kirti Magudia, Evan Calabrese
Purpose: To develop and evaluate an automated system for extracting structured clinical information from unstructured radiology and pathology reports using open-weights large language models (LMs) and retrieval augmented generation (RAG), and to assess the effects of model configuration variables on extraction performance. Methods and Materials: The study utilized two datasets: 7,294 radiology reports annotated for Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS) scores and 2,154 pathology reports annotated for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status. An automated pipeline was developed to benchmark the performance of various LMs and RAG configurations. The impact of model size, quantization, prompting strategies, output formatting, and inference parameters was systematically evaluated. Results: The best performing models achieved over 98% accuracy in extracting BT-RADS scores from radiology reports and over 90% for IDH mutation status extraction from pathology reports. The top model being medical fine-tuned llama3. Larger, newer, and domain fine-tuned models consistently outperformed older and smaller models. Model quantization had minimal impact on performance. Few-shot prompting significantly improved accuracy. RAG improved performance for complex pathology reports but not for shorter radiology reports. Conclusions: Open LMs demonstrate significant potential for automated extraction of structured clinical data from unstructured clinical reports with local privacy-preserving application. Careful model selection, prompt engineering, and semi-automated optimization using annotated data are critical for optimal performance. These approaches could be reliable enough for practical use in research workflows, highlighting the potential for human-machine collaboration in healthcare data extraction.
Read more9/18/2024