MuChoMusic: Evaluating Music Understanding in Multimodal Audio-Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2408.01337 - Published 8/6/2024 by Benno Weck, Ilaria Manco, Emmanouil Benetos, Elio Quinton, George Fazekas, Dmitry Bogdanov
Total Score

0

MuChoMusic: Evaluating Music Understanding in Multimodal Audio-Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Evaluates music understanding in multimodal audio-language models
  • Introduces the MuChoMusic dataset for assessing music-related language understanding
  • Analyzes performance of several state-of-the-art models on the MuChoMusic benchmark

Plain English Explanation

The research paper "MuChoMusic: Evaluating Music Understanding in Multimodal Audio-Language Models" explores how well modern AI systems that combine audio and language processing can understand and reason about music-related concepts. The authors introduce a new dataset called MuChoMusic, which tests a model's ability to comprehend and describe various musical elements like instruments, genres, and emotions.

By evaluating popular multimodal models on this new benchmark, the researchers aim to better understand the current state of music understanding in AI systems. This is an important step in developing AI assistants that can engage with users more naturally about music-related topics, such as recommending songs, analyzing musical compositions, or answering questions about music theory.

The paper provides insights into which types of music-related language and reasoning capabilities these models excel at, and where there is still room for improvement. This information can guide future research to build AI systems that have a more nuanced and human-like understanding of music.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the MuChoMusic dataset, which consists of over 40,000 audio-text pairs covering a diverse range of musical concepts. The audio clips come from a variety of musical genres, and the accompanying text descriptions use natural, colloquial language to discuss musical elements.

The researchers evaluate several state-of-the-art multimodal models on this benchmark, including CLIP, AudioCLIP, and M4U. They assess the models' performance on tasks like music genre classification, instrument identification, and generating text descriptions of audio clips.

The results show that existing models have strengths in recognizing broad musical concepts, but struggle with more nuanced and contextual understanding of music. For example, the models perform well on identifying instruments but have difficulty describing the emotional qualities of musical pieces.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges some limitations of the MuChoMusic dataset, such as the subjective nature of some music-related language and the potential for biases in the data collection. Additionally, the evaluation only covers a subset of possible music understanding tasks, and there may be other important capabilities that were not assessed.

While the results provide a useful benchmark of current model capabilities, the authors encourage further research to continue advancing music understanding in multimodal AI systems. Potential areas for improvement include developing more sophisticated language modeling for musical concepts, incorporating music theory knowledge, and exploring cross-modal learning between audio and text.

Conclusion

The "MuChoMusic" paper makes an important contribution by introducing a new dataset and evaluation framework for assessing music understanding in multimodal AI models. The insights gained from this research can help guide the development of AI assistants that can engage more naturally and knowledgeably with users on a wide range of music-related topics. As the field continues to progress, we can expect to see increasingly capable and versatile AI systems that can truly appreciate and reason about the complexities of music.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

MuChoMusic: Evaluating Music Understanding in Multimodal Audio-Language Models
Total Score

0

MuChoMusic: Evaluating Music Understanding in Multimodal Audio-Language Models

Benno Weck, Ilaria Manco, Emmanouil Benetos, Elio Quinton, George Fazekas, Dmitry Bogdanov

Multimodal models that jointly process audio and language hold great promise in audio understanding and are increasingly being adopted in the music domain. By allowing users to query via text and obtain information about a given audio input, these models have the potential to enable a variety of music understanding tasks via language-based interfaces. However, their evaluation poses considerable challenges, and it remains unclear how to effectively assess their ability to correctly interpret music-related inputs with current methods. Motivated by this, we introduce MuChoMusic, a benchmark for evaluating music understanding in multimodal language models focused on audio. MuChoMusic comprises 1,187 multiple-choice questions, all validated by human annotators, on 644 music tracks sourced from two publicly available music datasets, and covering a wide variety of genres. Questions in the benchmark are crafted to assess knowledge and reasoning abilities across several dimensions that cover fundamental musical concepts and their relation to cultural and functional contexts. Through the holistic analysis afforded by the benchmark, we evaluate five open-source models and identify several pitfalls, including an over-reliance on the language modality, pointing to a need for better multimodal integration. Data and code are open-sourced.

Read more

8/6/2024

💬

Total Score

0

MuChin: A Chinese Colloquial Description Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models in the Field of Music

Zihao Wang, Shuyu Li, Tao Zhang, Qi Wang, Pengfei Yu, Jinyang Luo, Yan Liu, Ming Xi, Kejun Zhang

The rapidly evolving multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) urgently require new benchmarks to uniformly evaluate their performance on understanding and textually describing music. However, due to semantic gaps between Music Information Retrieval (MIR) algorithms and human understanding, discrepancies between professionals and the public, and low precision of annotations, existing music description datasets cannot serve as benchmarks. To this end, we present MuChin, the first open-source music description benchmark in Chinese colloquial language, designed to evaluate the performance of multimodal LLMs in understanding and describing music. We established the Caichong Music Annotation Platform (CaiMAP) that employs an innovative multi-person, multi-stage assurance method, and recruited both amateurs and professionals to ensure the precision of annotations and alignment with popular semantics. Utilizing this method, we built a dataset with multi-dimensional, high-precision music annotations, the Caichong Music Dataset (CaiMD), and carefully selected 1,000 high-quality entries to serve as the test set for MuChin. Based on MuChin, we analyzed the discrepancies between professionals and amateurs in terms of music description, and empirically demonstrated the effectiveness of annotated data for fine-tuning LLMs. Ultimately, we employed MuChin to evaluate existing music understanding models on their ability to provide colloquial descriptions of music. All data related to the benchmark, along with the scoring code and detailed appendices, have been open-sourced (https://github.com/CarlWangChina/MuChin/).

Read more

6/14/2024

M4U: Evaluating Multilingual Understanding and Reasoning for Large Multimodal Models
Total Score

0

M4U: Evaluating Multilingual Understanding and Reasoning for Large Multimodal Models

Hongyu Wang, Jiayu Xu, Senwei Xie, Ruiping Wang, Jialin Li, Zhaojie Xie, Bin Zhang, Chuyan Xiong, Xilin Chen

Multilingual multimodal reasoning is a core component in achieving human-level intelligence. However, most existing benchmarks for multilingual multimodal reasoning struggle to differentiate between models of varying performance; even language models without visual capabilities can easily achieve high scores. This leaves a comprehensive evaluation of leading multilingual multimodal models largely unexplored. In this work, we introduce M4U, a novel and challenging benchmark for assessing the capability of multi-discipline multilingual multimodal understanding and reasoning. M4U contains 8,931 samples covering 64 disciplines across 16 subfields in Science, Engineering, and Healthcare in Chinese, English, and German. Using M4U, we conduct extensive evaluations of 21 leading Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) with external tools. The evaluation results show that the state-of-the-art model, GPT-4o, achieves only 47.6% average accuracy on M4U. Additionally, we observe that the leading LMMs exhibit significant language preferences. Our in-depth analysis indicates that leading LMMs, including GPT-4o, suffer performance degradation when prompted with cross-lingual multimodal questions, such as images with key textual information in Chinese while the question is in German. We believe that M4U can serve as a crucial tool for systematically evaluating LMMs based on their multilingual multimodal reasoning capabilities and monitoring their development. The homepage, codes and data are public available.

Read more

5/27/2024

AudioBench: A Universal Benchmark for Audio Large Language Models
Total Score

0

AudioBench: A Universal Benchmark for Audio Large Language Models

Bin Wang, Xunlong Zou, Geyu Lin, Shuo Sun, Zhuohan Liu, Wenyu Zhang, Zhengyuan Liu, AiTi Aw, Nancy F. Chen

We introduce AudioBench, a universal benchmark designed to evaluate Audio Large Language Models (AudioLLMs). It encompasses 8 distinct tasks and 26 datasets, among which, 7 are newly proposed datasets. The evaluation targets three main aspects: speech understanding, audio scene understanding, and voice understanding (paralinguistic). Despite recent advancements, there lacks a comprehensive benchmark for AudioLLMs on instruction following capabilities conditioned on audio signals. AudioBench addresses this gap by setting up datasets as well as desired evaluation metrics. Besides, we also evaluated the capabilities of five popular models and found that no single model excels consistently across all tasks. We outline the research outlook for AudioLLMs and anticipate that our open-sourced evaluation toolkit, data, and leaderboard will offer a robust testbed for future model developments.

Read more

9/4/2024