Multi-fidelity Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

2405.05033

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/9/2024 by Dhruv V. Patel, Jonghyun Lee, Matthew W. Farthing, Peter K. Kitanidis, Eric F. Darve
Multi-fidelity Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

Abstract

Numerous applications in biology, statistics, science, and engineering require generating samples from high-dimensional probability distributions. In recent years, the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) method has emerged as a state-of-the-art Markov chain Monte Carlo technique, exploiting the shape of such high-dimensional target distributions to efficiently generate samples. Despite its impressive empirical success and increasing popularity, its wide-scale adoption remains limited due to the high computational cost of gradient calculation. Moreover, applying this method is impossible when the gradient of the posterior cannot be computed (for example, with black-box simulators). To overcome these challenges, we propose a novel two-stage Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm with a surrogate model. In this multi-fidelity algorithm, the acceptance probability is computed in the first stage via a standard HMC proposal using an inexpensive differentiable surrogate model, and if the proposal is accepted, the posterior is evaluated in the second stage using the high-fidelity (HF) numerical solver. Splitting the standard HMC algorithm into these two stages allows for approximating the gradient of the posterior efficiently, while producing accurate posterior samples by using HF numerical solvers in the second stage. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this algorithm for a range of problems, including linear and nonlinear Bayesian inverse problems with in-silico data and experimental data. The proposed algorithm is shown to seamlessly integrate with various low-fidelity and HF models, priors, and datasets. Remarkably, our proposed method outperforms the traditional HMC algorithm in both computational and statistical efficiency by several orders of magnitude, all while retaining or improving the accuracy in computed posterior statistics.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel approach to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) sampling called "Multi-fidelity Hamiltonian Monte Carlo" (MFHMC).
  • MFHMC aims to improve the efficiency of HMC by leveraging multiple fidelity levels of the target distribution, which can provide computational savings.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of MFHMC on several Bayesian inverse problems and highlight its advantages over standard HMC.

Plain English Explanation

Bayesian inverse problems involve estimating unknown parameters in a model based on observed data. This can be a challenging task, especially for complex models with many parameters. Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) is a powerful technique for sampling from the probability distribution of these parameters, but it can be computationally expensive.

The key idea behind the "Multi-fidelity Hamiltonian Monte Carlo" (MFHMC) approach is to use multiple approximations or "fidelity levels" of the target distribution to speed up the sampling process. The authors propose a way to seamlessly transition between these different fidelity levels during the HMC simulation, allowing the algorithm to spend more time exploring the high-fidelity regions of the distribution where the parameters are most likely to be.

For example, imagine you're trying to estimate the parameters of a complex weather model based on observed data. The high-fidelity version of the model might take a long time to run, but you could use a faster, lower-fidelity approximation to guide the initial stages of the HMC sampling. As the algorithm converges to the most promising regions of the parameter space, it can then switch to the high-fidelity model to refine the estimates.

By leveraging these multiple fidelity levels, MFHMC can achieve significant computational savings compared to standard HMC, while still maintaining the accuracy of the final parameter estimates. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several Bayesian inverse problems, showing that MFHMC outperforms standard HMC in terms of both efficiency and accuracy.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose a novel approach called "Multi-fidelity Hamiltonian Monte Carlo" (MFHMC) that aims to improve the efficiency of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) sampling for Bayesian inverse problems. HMC is a powerful technique for sampling from the posterior distribution of model parameters, but it can be computationally expensive, especially for complex models.

MFHMC leverages multiple fidelity levels of the target distribution to provide computational savings. The key idea is to use a hierarchy of surrogate models, each with a different level of approximation to the true target distribution. During the HMC simulation, the algorithm seamlessly transitions between these different fidelity levels, spending more time exploring the high-fidelity regions of the distribution where the parameters are most likely to be.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of MFHMC on several Bayesian inverse problems, including parameter inference for diffusion models, Gaussian process surrogate modeling, and long-range tracking in posterior distributions. They show that MFHMC can achieve significant computational savings compared to standard HMC, while maintaining the accuracy of the final parameter estimates.

The authors also discuss the connection between MFHMC and other multi-fidelity techniques, such as 3D Gaussian splatting as Markov Chain Monte Carlo and penalized Langevin Monte Carlo algorithms. They highlight the advantages of their approach and the potential for further improvements and extensions.

Critical Analysis

The authors present a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the MFHMC approach, demonstrating its effectiveness on a variety of Bayesian inverse problems. The use of multiple fidelity levels is a promising strategy for improving the efficiency of HMC, and the authors have done a good job of integrating this idea into the HMC framework.

One potential limitation of the MFHMC approach is the need to construct the hierarchy of surrogate models, which may require significant upfront effort and domain-specific knowledge. The authors acknowledge this challenge and discuss the potential for more automated or data-driven approaches to generating the fidelity levels.

Additionally, the performance of MFHMC may be sensitive to the specific choice of fidelity levels and the transition strategy between them. The authors have provided some guidance on these design choices, but further research may be needed to develop more robust and generalizable strategies.

Finally, while the authors have demonstrated the benefits of MFHMC on several benchmark problems, it would be interesting to see how the approach scales to larger and more complex real-world Bayesian inverse problems. Exploring the limitations and potential drawbacks of MFHMC in such settings could provide valuable insights for the research community.

Conclusion

The "Multi-fidelity Hamiltonian Monte Carlo" (MFHMC) approach proposed in this paper represents an important step forward in improving the efficiency of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling for Bayesian inverse problems. By leveraging multiple fidelity levels of the target distribution, MFHMC can achieve significant computational savings while maintaining the accuracy of the final parameter estimates.

The authors have provided a thorough evaluation of their approach and have demonstrated its effectiveness on a range of benchmark problems. While there are still some challenges to address, such as the construction of the fidelity hierarchy and the sensitivity to design choices, the MFHMC framework is a promising direction for further research and development.

As Bayesian methods continue to find widespread applications in fields like physics, engineering, and data science, tools like MFHMC that can improve the efficiency and scalability of these techniques will become increasingly valuable. The insights and techniques presented in this paper have the potential to significantly impact the way Bayesian inverse problems are solved in the future.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🎯

Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation by Hamiltonian Monte Carlo: Applications to Cardiac MRI Segmentation

Yidong Zhao, Joao Tourais, Iain Pierce, Christian Nitsche, Thomas A. Treibel, Sebastian Weingartner, Artur M. Schweidtmann, Qian Tao

YC

0

Reddit

0

Deep learning (DL)-based methods have achieved state-of-the-art performance for many medical image segmentation tasks. Nevertheless, recent studies show that deep neural networks (DNNs) can be miscalibrated and overconfident, leading to silent failures that are risky for clinical applications. Bayesian DL provides an intuitive approach to DL failure detection, based on posterior probability estimation. However, the posterior is intractable for large medical image segmentation DNNs. To tackle this challenge, we propose a Bayesian learning framework using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), tempered by cold posterior (CP) to accommodate medical data augmentation, named HMC-CP. For HMC computation, we further propose a cyclical annealing strategy, capturing both local and global geometries of the posterior distribution, enabling highly efficient Bayesian DNN training with the same computational budget as training a single DNN. The resulting Bayesian DNN outputs an ensemble segmentation along with the segmentation uncertainty. We evaluate the proposed HMC-CP extensively on cardiac magnetic resonance image (MRI) segmentation, using in-domain steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine images as well as out-of-domain datasets of quantitative T1 and T2 mapping. Our results show that the proposed method improves both segmentation accuracy and uncertainty estimation for in- and out-of-domain data, compared with well-established baseline methods such as Monte Carlo Dropout and Deep Ensembles. Additionally, we establish a conceptual link between HMC and the commonly known stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and provide general insight into the uncertainty of DL. This uncertainty is implicitly encoded in the training dynamics but often overlooked. With reliable uncertainty estimation, our method provides a promising direction toward trustworthy DL in clinical applications.

Read more

6/28/2024

🤯

Unbiased Kinetic Langevin Monte Carlo with Inexact Gradients

Neil K. Chada, Benedict Leimkuhler, Daniel Paulin, Peter A. Whalley

YC

0

Reddit

0

We present an unbiased method for Bayesian posterior means based on kinetic Langevin dynamics that combines advanced splitting methods with enhanced gradient approximations. Our approach avoids Metropolis correction by coupling Markov chains at different discretization levels in a multilevel Monte Carlo approach. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that our proposed estimator is unbiased, attains finite variance, and satisfies a central limit theorem. It can achieve accuracy $epsilon>0$ for estimating expectations of Lipschitz functions in $d$ dimensions with $mathcal{O}(d^{1/4}epsilon^{-2})$ expected gradient evaluations, without assuming warm start. We exhibit similar bounds using both approximate and stochastic gradients, and our method's computational cost is shown to scale independently of the size of the dataset. The proposed method is tested using a multinomial regression problem on the MNIST dataset and a Poisson regression model for soccer scores. Experiments indicate that the number of gradient evaluations per effective sample is independent of dimension, even when using inexact gradients. For product distributions, we give dimension-independent variance bounds. Our results demonstrate that the unbiased algorithm we present can be much more efficient than the ``gold-standard randomized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.

Read more

5/24/2024

Symmetry-driven embedding of networks in hyperbolic space

Symmetry-driven embedding of networks in hyperbolic space

Simon Lizotte, Jean-Gabriel Young, Antoine Allard

YC

0

Reddit

0

Hyperbolic models can reproduce the heavy-tailed degree distribution, high clustering, and hierarchical structure of empirical networks. Current algorithms for finding the hyperbolic coordinates of networks, however, do not quantify uncertainty in the inferred coordinates. We present BIGUE, a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm that samples the posterior distribution of a Bayesian hyperbolic random graph model. We show that combining random walk and random cluster transformations significantly improves mixing compared to the commonly used and state-of-the-art dynamic Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm. Using this algorithm, we also provide evidence that the posterior distribution cannot be approximated by a multivariate normal distribution, thereby justifying the use of MCMC to quantify the uncertainty of the inferred parameters.

Read more

6/18/2024

🤯

Diffusion-HMC: Parameter Inference with Diffusion Model driven Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

Nayantara Mudur, Carolina Cuesta-Lazaro, Douglas P. Finkbeiner

YC

0

Reddit

0

Diffusion generative models have excelled at diverse image generation and reconstruction tasks across fields. A less explored avenue is their application to discriminative tasks involving regression or classification problems. The cornerstone of modern cosmology is the ability to generate predictions for observed astrophysical fields from theory and constrain physical models from observations using these predictions. This work uses a single diffusion generative model to address these interlinked objectives -- as a surrogate model or emulator for cold dark matter density fields conditional on input cosmological parameters, and as a parameter inference model that solves the inverse problem of constraining the cosmological parameters of an input field. The model is able to emulate fields with summary statistics consistent with those of the simulated target distribution. We then leverage the approximate likelihood of the diffusion generative model to derive tight constraints on cosmology by using the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo method to sample the posterior on cosmological parameters for a given test image. Finally, we demonstrate that this parameter inference approach is more robust to the addition of noise than baseline parameter inference networks.

Read more

5/9/2024