A Multi-Modal Explainability Approach for Human-Aware Robots in Multi-Party Conversation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a multi-modal explainability approach for human-aware robots in multi-party conversations.
- The goal is to enable robots to explain their actions and decisions in a way that is understandable and trustworthy to human conversation partners.
- The approach combines visual, textual, and audio modalities to provide explanations that are tailored to the specific context and needs of the users.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new way for robots to explain their actions and decisions to people during group conversations. The goal is to make the robots' behavior more transparent and understandable, so that people can better trust and collaborate with them.
The key idea is to use multiple forms of communication - visual, textual, and audio - to provide explanations that are tailored to the specific situation and the needs of the people involved. For example, the robot might display relevant information on a screen, speak out loud to clarify its reasoning, and provide written summaries to supplement the verbal explanations.
By using this multi-modal approach, the researchers aim to create explanations that are clear, detailed, and helpful for the humans participating in the conversation. This could be particularly important in complex, dynamic situations where robots and humans need to work together closely and trust each other's actions.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a multi-modal explainability approach for human-aware robots in multi-party conversations. The approach combines visual, textual, and audio modalities to provide explanations that are tailored to the specific context and needs of the users.
The system first detects the relevant conversation context, including the participants, their attentional focus, and the flow of the discussion. It then selects the appropriate explanation modalities and content based on factors such as the users' preferences, cognitive load, and level of expertise.
The visual explanations may include information visualizations or highlighted elements in the robot's perception. The textual explanations provide detailed reasoning and background information. The audio explanations allow the robot to verbally clarify and emphasize key points.
By combining these modalities, the system aims to create multi-modal explanations that are comprehensive, understandable, and tailored to the specific needs of the human conversation partners.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to improving the transparency and trustworthiness of human-robot interactions in multi-party conversations. The use of multiple explanation modalities is a promising way to address the complexities of such dynamic, real-world situations.
However, the paper does not provide detailed experimental results or user studies to validate the effectiveness of the proposed system. While the technical approach seems well-designed, more empirical evidence is needed to demonstrate its practical benefits and limitations.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential challenges around the scalability of the system, such as how it would handle large groups or rapidly changing conversations. There may also be concerns around the cognitive load and information overload that could arise from the multi-modal explanations, which the authors do not fully explore.
Further research is needed to refine and evaluate the multi-modal explainability approach in realistic, practical settings. Addressing these challenges could help solidify the contribution of this work and inform the development of more effective human-robot collaboration systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel multi-modal explainability approach for human-aware robots in multi-party conversations. By combining visual, textual, and audio modalities, the system aims to provide explanations that are tailored to the specific context and needs of the human conversation partners.
The technical approach seems well-designed, but more empirical evidence is needed to validate its practical benefits and address potential scalability and cognitive load challenges. Further research in this area could lead to significant advancements in human-robot collaboration and trust in AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Multi-Modal Explainability Approach for Human-Aware Robots in Multi-Party Conversation
Iveta Bev{c}kov'a, v{S}tefan P'ocov{s}, Giulia Belgiovine, Marco Matarese, Alessandra Sciutti, Carlo Mazzola
The addressee estimation (understanding to whom somebody is talking) is a fundamental task for human activity recognition in multi-party conversation scenarios. Specifically, in the field of human-robot interaction, it becomes even more crucial to enable social robots to participate in such interactive contexts. However, it is usually implemented as a binary classification task, restricting the robot's capability to estimate whether it was addressed and limiting its interactive skills. For a social robot to gain the trust of humans, it is also important to manifest a certain level of transparency and explainability. Explainable artificial intelligence thus plays a significant role in the current machine learning applications and models, to provide explanations for their decisions besides excellent performance. In our work, we a) present an addressee estimation model with improved performance in comparison with the previous SOTA; b) further modify this model to include inherently explainable attention-based segments; c) implement the explainable addressee estimation as part of a modular cognitive architecture for multi-party conversation in an iCub robot; d) propose several ways to incorporate explainability and transparency in the aforementioned architecture; and e) perform a pilot user study to analyze the effect of various explanations on how human participants perceive the robot.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Incorporating Explanations into Human-Machine Interfaces for Trust and Situation Awareness in Autonomous Vehicles
Shahin Atakishiyev, Mohammad Salameh, Randy Goebel
Autonomous vehicles often make complex decisions via machine learning-based predictive models applied to collected sensor data. While this combination of methods provides a foundation for real-time actions, self-driving behavior primarily remains opaque to end users. In this sense, explainability of real-time decisions is a crucial and natural requirement for building trust in autonomous vehicles. Moreover, as autonomous vehicles still cause serious traffic accidents for various reasons, timely conveyance of upcoming hazards to road users can help improve scene understanding and prevent potential risks. Hence, there is also a need to supply autonomous vehicles with user-friendly interfaces for effective human-machine teaming. Motivated by this problem, we study the role of explainable AI and human-machine interface jointly in building trust in vehicle autonomy. We first present a broad context of the explanatory human-machine systems with the 3W1H (what, whom, when, how) approach. Based on these findings, we present a situation awareness framework for calibrating users' trust in self-driving behavior. Finally, we perform an experiment on our framework, conduct a user study on it, and validate the empirical findings with hypothesis testing.
Read more4/12/2024
0
Designs for Enabling Collaboration in Human-Machine Teaming via Interactive and Explainable Systems
Rohan Paleja, Michael Munje, Kimberlee Chang, Reed Jensen, Matthew Gombolay
Collaborative robots and machine learning-based virtual agents are increasingly entering the human workspace with the aim of increasing productivity and enhancing safety. Despite this, we show in a ubiquitous experimental domain, Overcooked-AI, that state-of-the-art techniques for human-machine teaming (HMT), which rely on imitation or reinforcement learning, are brittle and result in a machine agent that aims to decouple the machine and human's actions to act independently rather than in a synergistic fashion. To remedy this deficiency, we develop HMT approaches that enable iterative, mixed-initiative team development allowing end-users to interactively reprogram interpretable AI teammates. Our 50-subject study provides several findings that we summarize into guidelines. While all approaches underperform a simple collaborative heuristic (a critical, negative result for learning-based methods), we find that white-box approaches supported by interactive modification can lead to significant team development, outperforming white-box approaches alone, and black-box approaches are easier to train and result in better HMT performance highlighting a tradeoff between explainability and interactivity versus ease-of-training. Together, these findings present three important directions: 1) Improving the ability to generate collaborative agents with white-box models, 2) Better learning methods to facilitate collaboration rather than individualized coordination, and 3) Mixed-initiative interfaces that enable users, who may vary in ability, to improve collaboration.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Explainable Human-AI Interaction: A Planning Perspective
Sarath Sreedharan, Anagha Kulkarni, Subbarao Kambhampati
From its inception, AI has had a rather ambivalent relationship with humans -- swinging between their augmentation and replacement. Now, as AI technologies enter our everyday lives at an ever increasing pace, there is a greater need for AI systems to work synergistically with humans. One critical requirement for such synergistic human-AI interaction is that the AI systems be explainable to the humans in the loop. To do this effectively, AI agents need to go beyond planning with their own models of the world, and take into account the mental model of the human in the loop. Drawing from several years of research in our lab, we will discuss how the AI agent can use these mental models to either conform to human expectations, or change those expectations through explanatory communication. While the main focus of the book is on cooperative scenarios, we will point out how the same mental models can be used for obfuscation and deception. Although the book is primarily driven by our own research in these areas, in every chapter, we will provide ample connections to relevant research from other groups.
Read more5/28/2024