Multi-Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.06192 - Published 7/9/2024 by Xuweiyi Chen, Ziqiao Ma, Xuejun Zhang, Sihan Xu, Shengyi Qian, Jianing Yang, David F. Fouhey, Joyce Chai
Total Score

0

Multi-Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• This paper explores the phenomenon of multi-object hallucination in large vision-language models (VLMs), where the models generate images containing objects that are not present in the original image.

• The researchers investigate the prevalence and characteristics of multi-object hallucination, analyze its causes, and explore potential mitigation strategies.

• The findings have important implications for the development and deployment of VLMs, as well as our understanding of their inner workings and limitations.

Plain English Explanation

Large vision-language models (VLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate images based on text descriptions. However, a curious phenomenon has been observed with these models: they sometimes "hallucinate" objects in the generated images that are not actually present in the original text prompt.

This paper delves into the problem of "multi-object hallucination," where VLMs create images containing multiple objects that were not mentioned in the text. The researchers analyze how often this happens, what factors might contribute to it, and how we might be able to address this issue.

Understanding multi-object hallucination is important because it reveals fundamental limitations in how these AI models perceive and understand the world. If they are generating images with objects that were never described, it suggests they may have gaps in their knowledge or reasoning abilities. This could lead to problems if these models are used in real-world applications, such as generating images for product catalogs or medical diagnoses.

The researchers in this paper conduct a series of experiments to uncover the extent and nature of multi-object hallucination. They find that it is a relatively common occurrence, and that certain factors, like the complexity of the text prompt, can make it more likely to happen. The paper also explores potential ways to mitigate this problem, such as by improving the training data or the model architecture.

Overall, this research provides valuable insights into the inner workings of large vision-language models and highlights the need for continued scrutiny and improvement of these powerful AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper Logical Closed-Loop: Uncovering Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models investigates the phenomenon of multi-object hallucination in large vision-language models (VLMs). The researchers conduct a series of experiments to understand the prevalence, causes, and potential mitigation strategies for this issue.

The researchers first survey the existing literature on hallucination in large vision-language models, noting that most previous work has focused on single-object hallucination. They then develop a framework called the "Logical Closed-Loop" to evaluate and analyze the relationship between hallucinations and VLMs.

Using this framework, the researchers conduct experiments on popular VLM architectures, such as DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion. They find that multi-object hallucination is a relatively common occurrence, with up to 30% of generated images containing objects not mentioned in the text prompt.

The paper also explores potential causes of hallucination in multimodal large language models, such as biases in the training data, limitations in the model architecture, and flaws in the optimization process.

Finally, the researchers discuss strategies for evaluating the holistic coverage and faithfulness of large VLMs, highlighting the need for more comprehensive and rigorous testing to uncover and mitigate issues like multi-object hallucination.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed investigation of multi-object hallucination in large vision-language models. The researchers' use of the "Logical Closed-Loop" framework is a novel and promising approach to studying this issue, and their findings offer valuable insights into the limitations and potential pitfalls of these powerful AI systems.

One potential limitation of the study is the focus on a relatively small set of VLM architectures. While the researchers do examine some of the most widely used models, such as DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion, it would be interesting to see if the patterns of multi-object hallucination are consistent across a broader range of VLMs.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms or cognitive processes that might underlie the phenomenon of multi-object hallucination. While the researchers propose some potential causes, such as biases in the training data, further investigation into the model's internal representations and decision-making processes could yield additional insights.

Finally, while the researchers discuss potential mitigation strategies, the paper does not provide a comprehensive or definitive solution to the problem of multi-object hallucination. Continued research and experimentation will be necessary to develop more robust and reliable VLMs that can avoid such issues.

Conclusion

The paper's exploration of multi-object hallucination in large vision-language models is a significant contribution to our understanding of the limitations and potential pitfalls of these powerful AI systems. By uncovering the prevalence and characteristics of this phenomenon, the researchers have highlighted the need for more comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of VLMs, as well as the development of strategies to mitigate such issues.

The findings in this paper have important implications for the future development and deployment of VLMs, particularly in areas where their outputs may have real-world consequences, such as medical imaging or product design. As these models become increasingly widespread, it is crucial that we continue to study and address their limitations to ensure their safe and reliable use.

Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to understand and improve the capabilities of large vision-language models, ultimately paving the way for more robust and trustworthy AI systems that can reliably perceive and represent the world.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Multi-Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Models
Total Score

0

Multi-Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Models

Xuweiyi Chen, Ziqiao Ma, Xuejun Zhang, Sihan Xu, Shengyi Qian, Jianing Yang, David F. Fouhey, Joyce Chai

Large vision language models (LVLMs) often suffer from object hallucination, producing objects not present in the given images. While current benchmarks for object hallucination primarily concentrate on the presence of a single object class rather than individual entities, this work systematically investigates multi-object hallucination, examining how models misperceive (e.g., invent nonexistent objects or become distracted) when tasked with focusing on multiple objects simultaneously. We introduce Recognition-based Object Probing Evaluation (ROPE), an automated evaluation protocol that considers the distribution of object classes within a single image during testing and uses visual referring prompts to eliminate ambiguity. With comprehensive empirical studies and analysis of potential factors leading to multi-object hallucination, we found that (1) LVLMs suffer more hallucinations when focusing on multiple objects compared to a single object. (2) The tested object class distribution affects hallucination behaviors, indicating that LVLMs may follow shortcuts and spurious correlations.(3) Hallucinatory behaviors are influenced by data-specific factors, salience and frequency, and model intrinsic behaviors. We hope to enable LVLMs to recognize and reason about multiple objects that often occur in realistic visual scenes, provide insights, and quantify our progress towards mitigating the issues.

Read more

7/9/2024

🐍

Total Score

0

Logical Closed Loop: Uncovering Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models

Junfei Wu, Qiang Liu, Ding Wang, Jinghao Zhang, Shu Wu, Liang Wang, Tieniu Tan

Object hallucination has been an Achilles' heel which hinders the broader applications of large vision-language models (LVLMs). Object hallucination refers to the phenomenon that the LVLMs claim non-existent objects in the image. To mitigate the object hallucinations, instruction tuning and external model-based detection methods have been proposed, which either require large-scare computational resources or depend on the detection result of external models. However, there remains an under-explored field to utilize the LVLM itself to alleviate object hallucinations. In this work, we adopt the intuition that the LVLM tends to respond logically consistently for existent objects but inconsistently for hallucinated objects. Therefore, we propose a Logical Closed Loop-based framework for Object Hallucination Detection and Mitigation, namely LogicCheckGPT. In specific, we devise logical consistency probing to raise questions with logical correlations, inquiring about attributes from objects and vice versa. Whether their responses can form a logical closed loop serves as an indicator of object hallucination. As a plug-and-play method, it can be seamlessly applied to all existing LVLMs. Comprehensive experiments conducted on three benchmarks across four LVLMs have demonstrated significant improvements brought by our method, indicating its effectiveness and generality.

Read more

7/1/2024

A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
Total Score

0

A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models

Hanchao Liu, Wenyuan Xue, Yifei Chen, Dapeng Chen, Xiutian Zhao, Ke Wang, Liping Hou, Rongjun Li, Wei Peng

Recent development of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) has attracted growing attention within the AI landscape for its practical implementation potential. However, ``hallucination'', or more specifically, the misalignment between factual visual content and corresponding textual generation, poses a significant challenge of utilizing LVLMs. In this comprehensive survey, we dissect LVLM-related hallucinations in an attempt to establish an overview and facilitate future mitigation. Our scrutiny starts with a clarification of the concept of hallucinations in LVLMs, presenting a variety of hallucination symptoms and highlighting the unique challenges inherent in LVLM hallucinations. Subsequently, we outline the benchmarks and methodologies tailored specifically for evaluating hallucinations unique to LVLMs. Additionally, we delve into an investigation of the root causes of these hallucinations, encompassing insights from the training data and model components. We also critically review existing methods for mitigating hallucinations. The open questions and future directions pertaining to hallucinations within LVLMs are discussed to conclude this survey.

Read more

5/7/2024

Evaluating and Analyzing Relationship Hallucinations in LVLMs
Total Score

0

Evaluating and Analyzing Relationship Hallucinations in LVLMs

Mingrui Wu, Jiayi Ji, Oucheng Huang, Jiale Li, Yuhang Wu, Xiaoshuai Sun, Rongrong Ji

The issue of hallucinations is a prevalent concern in existing Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). Previous efforts have primarily focused on investigating object hallucinations, which can be easily alleviated by introducing object detectors. However, these efforts neglect hallucinations in inter-object relationships, which is essential for visual comprehension. In this work, we introduce R-Bench, a novel benchmark for evaluating Vision Relationship Hallucination. R-Bench features image-level questions that focus on the existence of relationships and instance-level questions that assess local visual comprehension. We identify three types of relationship co-occurrences that lead to hallucinations: relationship-relationship, subject-relationship, and relationship-object. The visual instruction tuning dataset's long-tail distribution significantly impacts LVLMs' understanding of visual relationships. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that current LVLMs tend to disregard visual content and overly rely on the common sense knowledge of Large Language Models. They also struggle with reasoning about spatial relationships based on contextual information.

Read more

7/19/2024