Evaluating and Analyzing Relationship Hallucinations in LVLMs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper evaluates and analyzes "relationship hallucinations" in large vision-language models (LVLMs), which are instances where the models generate incorrect relationships between objects or entities in an image.
- The researchers propose a new benchmark, VALOR, to comprehensively evaluate the faithfulness and coverage of LVLMs when generating relational descriptions of images.
- They also introduce a new dataset, MedHallu, focused on detecting and evaluating medical hallucinations in LVLMs.
- The findings provide insights into the types of relationship hallucinations common in LVLMs and offer guidance for improving their performance and robustness.
Plain English Explanation
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate text based on images. However, these models sometimes make mistakes in describing the relationships between objects or entities in an image, a phenomenon known as "relationship hallucinations."
This paper investigates these relationship hallucinations in depth. The researchers have developed a new benchmark called VALOR that can comprehensively evaluate how well LVLMs can accurately describe the relationships in images. They've also created a dataset called MedHallu that focuses on detecting and assessing hallucinations related to medical information.
By analyzing the types of mistakes LVLMs make when describing relationships, the researchers hope to help improve the accuracy and robustness of these powerful AI models. This could lead to better performance in real-world applications, such as medical diagnosis or autonomous driving, where correctly understanding the relationships between objects is crucial.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by highlighting the importance of understanding and addressing relationship hallucinations in LVLMs. These models are increasingly being used in high-stakes applications, and their ability to accurately describe the relationships between objects in an image is crucial.
To evaluate relationship hallucinations, the researchers introduce a new benchmark called VALOR (Evaluating Holistic Coverage and Faithfulness in Large-scale Vision-Language Models). VALOR assesses the faithfulness and coverage of LVLMs when generating relational descriptions of images. This includes evaluating both the correctness of the relationships described and the completeness of the relational coverage.
The paper also presents a new dataset, MedHallu, focused on detecting and evaluating medical hallucinations in LVLMs. This dataset includes images and captions related to medical scenarios, allowing the researchers to identify and analyze instances where the models generate incorrect or irrelevant medical information.
Through extensive experiments, the researchers analyze the types of relationship hallucinations that occur in LVLMs, such as incorrect spatial relationships, missing relationships, and hallucinated relationships. They also explore factors that contribute to these hallucinations, such as dataset bias and model architecture.
The findings provide insights into the strengths and limitations of current LVLMs and offer guidance for improving their performance and robustness in generating accurate and comprehensive relational descriptions of images.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed evaluation of relationship hallucinations in LVLMs, addressing an important and timely challenge in the field of vision-language AI. The introduction of the VALOR benchmark and the MedHallu dataset are valuable contributions that can help drive further research and development in this area.
One potential limitation of the study is the focus on a specific type of hallucination (relationship hallucinations) and the exclusion of other types of hallucinations, such as object or attribute hallucinations. While the paper acknowledges this, it would be interesting to see a more holistic evaluation of hallucination in LVLMs.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying causes of the observed relationship hallucinations. While the analysis of factors like dataset bias and model architecture is informative, further research may be needed to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms driving these hallucinations.
Despite these minor limitations, the paper makes a significant contribution to the field and provides a solid foundation for continued research on improving the reliability and robustness of large vision-language models.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation and analysis of relationship hallucinations in large vision-language models (LVLMs). By introducing the VALOR benchmark and the MedHallu dataset, the researchers have provided valuable tools for assessing the faithfulness and coverage of LVLMs in generating accurate relational descriptions of images.
The findings offer insights into the types of relationship hallucinations that commonly occur in these models, such as incorrect spatial relationships, missing relationships, and hallucinated relationships. The paper also explores factors that contribute to these hallucinations, like dataset bias and model architecture.
The insights gained from this research can inform the development of more robust and reliable LVLMs, which will be crucial for their successful deployment in high-stakes applications like medical diagnosis and autonomous driving. By addressing relationship hallucinations, the field can take an important step towards building vision-language AI systems that can consistently and accurately describe the world around them.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Evaluating and Analyzing Relationship Hallucinations in LVLMs
Mingrui Wu, Jiayi Ji, Oucheng Huang, Jiale Li, Yuhang Wu, Xiaoshuai Sun, Rongrong Ji
The issue of hallucinations is a prevalent concern in existing Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). Previous efforts have primarily focused on investigating object hallucinations, which can be easily alleviated by introducing object detectors. However, these efforts neglect hallucinations in inter-object relationships, which is essential for visual comprehension. In this work, we introduce R-Bench, a novel benchmark for evaluating Vision Relationship Hallucination. R-Bench features image-level questions that focus on the existence of relationships and instance-level questions that assess local visual comprehension. We identify three types of relationship co-occurrences that lead to hallucinations: relationship-relationship, subject-relationship, and relationship-object. The visual instruction tuning dataset's long-tail distribution significantly impacts LVLMs' understanding of visual relationships. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that current LVLMs tend to disregard visual content and overly rely on the common sense knowledge of Large Language Models. They also struggle with reasoning about spatial relationships based on contextual information.
Read more7/19/2024
0
A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
Hanchao Liu, Wenyuan Xue, Yifei Chen, Dapeng Chen, Xiutian Zhao, Ke Wang, Liping Hou, Rongjun Li, Wei Peng
Recent development of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) has attracted growing attention within the AI landscape for its practical implementation potential. However, ``hallucination'', or more specifically, the misalignment between factual visual content and corresponding textual generation, poses a significant challenge of utilizing LVLMs. In this comprehensive survey, we dissect LVLM-related hallucinations in an attempt to establish an overview and facilitate future mitigation. Our scrutiny starts with a clarification of the concept of hallucinations in LVLMs, presenting a variety of hallucination symptoms and highlighting the unique challenges inherent in LVLM hallucinations. Subsequently, we outline the benchmarks and methodologies tailored specifically for evaluating hallucinations unique to LVLMs. Additionally, we delve into an investigation of the root causes of these hallucinations, encompassing insights from the training data and model components. We also critically review existing methods for mitigating hallucinations. The open questions and future directions pertaining to hallucinations within LVLMs are discussed to conclude this survey.
Read more5/7/2024
0
Multi-Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Models
Xuweiyi Chen, Ziqiao Ma, Xuejun Zhang, Sihan Xu, Shengyi Qian, Jianing Yang, David F. Fouhey, Joyce Chai
Large vision language models (LVLMs) often suffer from object hallucination, producing objects not present in the given images. While current benchmarks for object hallucination primarily concentrate on the presence of a single object class rather than individual entities, this work systematically investigates multi-object hallucination, examining how models misperceive (e.g., invent nonexistent objects or become distracted) when tasked with focusing on multiple objects simultaneously. We introduce Recognition-based Object Probing Evaluation (ROPE), an automated evaluation protocol that considers the distribution of object classes within a single image during testing and uses visual referring prompts to eliminate ambiguity. With comprehensive empirical studies and analysis of potential factors leading to multi-object hallucination, we found that (1) LVLMs suffer more hallucinations when focusing on multiple objects compared to a single object. (2) The tested object class distribution affects hallucination behaviors, indicating that LVLMs may follow shortcuts and spurious correlations.(3) Hallucinatory behaviors are influenced by data-specific factors, salience and frequency, and model intrinsic behaviors. We hope to enable LVLMs to recognize and reason about multiple objects that often occur in realistic visual scenes, provide insights, and quantify our progress towards mitigating the issues.
Read more7/9/2024
0
VALOR-EVAL: Holistic Coverage and Faithfulness Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models
Haoyi Qiu, Wenbo Hu, Zi-Yi Dou, Nanyun Peng
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) suffer from hallucination issues, wherein the models generate plausible-sounding but factually incorrect outputs, undermining their reliability. A comprehensive quantitative evaluation is necessary to identify and understand the extent of hallucinations in these models. However, existing benchmarks are often limited in scope, focusing mainly on object hallucinations. Furthermore, current evaluation methods struggle to effectively address the subtle semantic distinctions between model outputs and reference data, as well as the balance between hallucination and informativeness. To address these issues, we introduce a multi-dimensional benchmark covering objects, attributes, and relations, with challenging images selected based on associative biases. Moreover, we propose a large language model (LLM)-based two-stage evaluation framework that generalizes the popular CHAIR metric and incorporates both faithfulness and coverage into the evaluation. Experiments on 10 established LVLMs demonstrate that our evaluation metric is more comprehensive and better correlated with humans than existing work when evaluating on our challenging human-annotated benchmark dataset. Our work also highlights the critical balance between faithfulness and coverage of model outputs, and encourages future works to address hallucinations in LVLMs while keeping their outputs informative.
Read more7/16/2024