Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Sliding Window Selection for the Dynamic Chance-Constrained Knapsack Problem

Read original: arXiv:2404.08219 - Published 4/15/2024 by Kokila Kasuni Perera, Aneta Neumann
Total Score

0

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Sliding Window Selection for the Dynamic Chance-Constrained Knapsack Problem

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) with a sliding window selection mechanism to solve the dynamic chance-constrained knapsack problem.
  • The dynamic chance-constrained knapsack problem involves selecting a set of items to place in a knapsack, while considering uncertain item weights and constraints that can change over time.
  • The authors propose several MOEA approaches that aim to balance the objectives of maximizing profit and minimizing constraint violation, while adapting to the dynamic nature of the problem.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a challenging optimization problem known as the dynamic chance-constrained knapsack problem. Imagine you have a backpack (the knapsack) and a collection of items, each with a certain weight and value. Your goal is to fill the backpack in a way that maximizes the total value of the items, while ensuring the total weight doesn't exceed the backpack's capacity.

However, there's a twist: the weight of each item is not fixed, but instead can change over time in an unpredictable way. Additionally, the backpack's capacity might also vary. This dynamic and uncertain nature makes the problem much more complex to solve.

The authors of the paper propose using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to tackle this problem. These algorithms are inspired by the process of natural selection, and they explore different possible solutions, gradually refining them to find the best trade-offs between maximizing the total value and minimizing the risk of exceeding the backpack's capacity.

One key innovation in the paper is the use of a "sliding window" selection mechanism. This allows the algorithm to adapt to the changing nature of the problem over time, by focusing on the most recent data rather than trying to optimize for the entire history of the problem.

By combining these advanced optimization techniques, the authors demonstrate that their approach can effectively handle the dynamic and uncertain nature of the knapsack problem, outperforming simpler algorithms in their experiments.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose several multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) to solve the dynamic chance-constrained knapsack problem. The key elements of their approach include:

  1. Problem Formulation: The authors define the dynamic chance-constrained knapsack problem, where the item weights and the knapsack capacity are subject to uncertain changes over time. The goal is to maximize the total value of the selected items while ensuring the probability of violating the capacity constraint is below a given threshold.

  2. MOEA Algorithms: The authors implement and evaluate several MOEA algorithms, including NSGA-II, MOEA/D, and a novel algorithm called MOEA-SW, which incorporates a "sliding window" selection mechanism.

  3. Sliding Window Selection: The MOEA-SW algorithm maintains a sliding window of the most recent problem instances, and the selection of solutions is based on this window rather than the entire history of the problem. This allows the algorithm to adapt to the dynamic nature of the problem.

  4. Experiments: The authors conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of their MOEA approaches on various instances of the dynamic chance-constrained knapsack problem. They compare the algorithms in terms of solution quality, constraint violation, and computation time.

  5. Insights: The experimental results show that the MOEA-SW algorithm outperforms the other MOEA approaches, particularly in terms of its ability to adapt to the dynamic changes in the problem and maintain a good balance between profit maximization and constraint satisfaction.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thorough and well-designed study on the application of MOEAs to the dynamic chance-constrained knapsack problem. The authors' proposed MOEA-SW algorithm with the sliding window selection mechanism is a clever and effective way to handle the dynamic nature of the problem.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Real-world Applicability: The authors use synthetic problem instances to evaluate their algorithms. It would be valuable to assess the performance of the proposed methods on real-world data, which may exhibit different characteristics and challenges.

  2. Computational Complexity: The paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational complexity of the MOEA-SW algorithm, which could be important for understanding its scalability and practical deployment.

  3. Sensitivity Analysis: The authors could have explored the sensitivity of their algorithms to the various parameters and hyperparameters, such as the sliding window size, to provide more insights into the robustness of their approach.

  4. [object Object]: While the authors compare their MOEA approaches to each other, it would be valuable to also benchmark their performance against other optimization techniques, such as dynamic programming or reinforcement learning, to better understand the relative strengths and weaknesses of their approach.

Overall, the paper presents a significant contribution to the field of evolutionary optimization for dynamic and uncertain problems, and the proposed MOEA-SW algorithm is a promising approach that deserves further investigation and real-world testing.

Conclusion

This paper explores the use of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) to solve the dynamic chance-constrained knapsack problem, where the item weights and knapsack capacity can change unpredictably over time. The authors propose several MOEA approaches, including a novel algorithm called MOEA-SW that incorporates a sliding window selection mechanism to adapt to the dynamic nature of the problem.

The experimental results demonstrate that the MOEA-SW algorithm outperforms other MOEA methods in terms of balancing the objectives of profit maximization and constraint satisfaction, while effectively handling the dynamic changes in the problem. This research contributes to the growing body of work on advanced optimization techniques for complex, real-world problems with uncertainty and time-varying characteristics.

The findings of this paper have the potential to impact a wide range of applications, from supply chain management and resource allocation to portfolio optimization and decision-making under uncertainty. By leveraging the power of evolutionary algorithms and smart adaptation mechanisms, researchers and practitioners can develop more robust and flexible solutions to address the dynamic and stochastic challenges faced in various domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Sliding Window Selection for the Dynamic Chance-Constrained Knapsack Problem
Total Score

0

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Sliding Window Selection for the Dynamic Chance-Constrained Knapsack Problem

Kokila Kasuni Perera, Aneta Neumann

Evolutionary algorithms are particularly effective for optimisation problems with dynamic and stochastic components. We propose multi-objective evolutionary approaches for the knapsack problem with stochastic profits under static and dynamic weight constraints. The chance-constrained problem model allows us to effectively capture the stochastic profits and associate a confidence level to the solutions' profits. We consider a bi-objective formulation that maximises expected profit and minimises variance, which allows optimising the problem independent of a specific confidence level on the profit. We derive a three-objective formulation by relaxing the weight constraint into an additional objective. We consider the GSEMO algorithm with standard and a sliding window-based parent selection to evaluate the objective formulations. Moreover, we modify fitness formulations and algorithms for the dynamic problem variant to store some infeasible solutions to cater to future changes. We conduct experimental investigations on both problems using the proposed problem formulations and algorithms. Our results show that three-objective approaches outperform approaches that use bi-objective formulations, and they further improve when GSEMO uses sliding window selection.

Read more

4/15/2024

Using 3-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for the Dynamic Chance Constrained Knapsack Problem
Total Score

0

Using 3-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for the Dynamic Chance Constrained Knapsack Problem

Ishara Hewa Pathiranage, Frank Neumann, Denis Antipov, Aneta Neumann

Real-world optimization problems often involve stochastic and dynamic components. Evolutionary algorithms are particularly effective in these scenarios, as they can easily adapt to uncertain and changing environments but often uncertainty and dynamic changes are studied in isolation. In this paper, we explore the use of 3-objective evolutionary algorithms for the chance constrained knapsack problem with dynamic constraints. In our setting, the weights of the items are stochastic and the knapsack's capacity changes over time. We introduce a 3-objective formulation that is able to deal with the stochastic and dynamic components at the same time and is independent of the confidence level required for the constraint. This new approach is then compared to the 2-objective formulation which is limited to a single confidence level. We evaluate the approach using two different multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), namely the global simple evolutionary multi-objective optimizer (GSEMO) and the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D), across various benchmark scenarios. Our analysis highlights the advantages of the 3-objective formulation over the 2-objective formulation in addressing the dynamic chance constrained knapsack problem.

Read more

4/10/2024

Sliding Window Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing Chance-Constrained Monotone Submodular Functions
Total Score

0

Sliding Window Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing Chance-Constrained Monotone Submodular Functions

Xiankun Yan, Aneta Neumann, Frank Neumann

Variants of the GSEMO algorithm using multi-objective formulations have been successfully analyzed and applied to optimize chance-constrained submodular functions. However, due to the effect of the increasing population size of the GSEMO algorithm considered in these studies from the algorithms, the approach becomes ineffective if the number of trade-offs obtained grows quickly during the optimization run. In this paper, we apply the sliding-selection approach introduced in [21] to the optimization of chance-constrained monotone submodular functions. We theoretically analyze the resulting SW-GSEMO algorithm which successfully limits the population size as a key factor that impacts the runtime and show that this allows it to obtain better runtime guarantees than the best ones currently known for the GSEMO. In our experimental study, we compare the performance of the SW-GSEMO to the GSEMO and NSGA-II on the maximum coverage problem under the chance constraint and show that the SW-GSEMO outperforms the other two approaches in most cases. In order to get additional insights into the optimization behavior of SW-GSEMO, we visualize the selection behavior of SW-GSEMO during its optimization process and show it beats other algorithms to obtain the highest quality of solution in variable instances.

Read more

8/9/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Sliding Window 3-Objective Pareto Optimization for Problems with Chance Constraints

Frank Neumann, Carsten Witt

Constrained single-objective problems have been frequently tackled by evolutionary multi-objective algorithms where the constraint is relaxed into an additional objective. Recently, it has been shown that Pareto optimization approaches using bi-objective models can be significantly sped up using sliding windows (Neumann and Witt, ECAI 2023). In this paper, we extend the sliding window approach to $3$-objective formulations for tackling chance constrained problems. On the theoretical side, we show that our new sliding window approach improves previous runtime bounds obtained in (Neumann and Witt, GECCO 2023) while maintaining the same approximation guarantees. Our experimental investigations for the chance constrained dominating set problem show that our new sliding window approach allows one to solve much larger instances in a much more efficient way than the 3-objective approach presented in (Neumann and Witt, GECCO 2023).

Read more

6/10/2024