Sliding Window Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing Chance-Constrained Monotone Submodular Functions

Read original: arXiv:2407.09731 - Published 8/9/2024 by Xiankun Yan, Aneta Neumann, Frank Neumann
Total Score

0

Sliding Window Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing Chance-Constrained Monotone Submodular Functions

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new class of sliding window bi-objective evolutionary algorithms for optimizing chance-constrained monotone submodular functions.
  • The algorithms use a sliding window approach to balance exploration and exploitation, and they are designed to work well for problems with chance constraints, where the goal is to maximize a submodular function while satisfying probabilistic constraints.
  • The paper provides a theoretical analysis of the runtime of these algorithms, as well as an empirical evaluation on various problem instances.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a class of optimization problems where the goal is to maximize a certain function, but there are also some constraints that need to be satisfied. Specifically, the constraints are probabilistic in nature - they state that the solution must satisfy certain conditions with a high probability.

These types of "chance-constrained" optimization problems arise in many real-world scenarios, such as resource allocation, sensor placement, and portfolio optimization. The functions being optimized are often submodular, which means they have a diminishing returns property that makes them well-suited for efficient optimization.

The researchers propose a new family of sliding window bi-objective evolutionary algorithms to solve these chance-constrained submodular optimization problems. The key idea is to use a sliding window approach, which helps balance the exploration of new solutions and the exploitation of good solutions found so far.

The paper provides a thorough analysis of the runtime of these algorithms, showing that they can efficiently find high-quality solutions. The researchers also evaluate the algorithms on various problem instances, demonstrating their effectiveness in practice.

Overall, this work advances the state of the art in multi-objective evolutionary optimization by introducing a new class of algorithms tailored to chance-constrained submodular problems, which are important in many real-world applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a new class of sliding window bi-objective evolutionary algorithms for optimizing chance-constrained monotone submodular functions. These algorithms maintain a sliding window of solutions and use a bi-objective approach to balance exploration and exploitation.

The first objective is to maximize the submodular function of interest, while the second objective is to maximize the probability of satisfying the chance constraints. The algorithms use a combination of mutation, crossover, and selection operators to evolve the population of solutions within the sliding window.

The paper provides a detailed runtime analysis of these algorithms, showing that they can efficiently find high-quality solutions. Specifically, the researchers prove that the algorithms can achieve a constant-factor approximation of the optimal solution in polynomial time.

The empirical evaluation of the algorithms is conducted on various chance-constrained submodular optimization problems, including sensor placement, influence maximization, and portfolio optimization. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach compared to alternative methods, such as 3-objective evolutionary algorithms and sampling-based techniques.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and well-designed approach to solving chance-constrained submodular optimization problems using sliding window bi-objective evolutionary algorithms. The theoretical analysis of the runtime is thorough and provides strong guarantees on the algorithm's performance.

However, the paper does not address several potential limitations and areas for further research. For instance, the analysis assumes that the submodular function and the chance constraints are known a priori, which may not always be the case in real-world applications. It would be interesting to explore how these algorithms could be extended to handle scenarios with unknown or partially known problem characteristics.

Additionally, the empirical evaluation is limited to a few problem instances, and it would be valuable to see how the algorithms scale and perform on larger-scale, more complex problems. The paper also does not discuss the sensitivity of the algorithms to their hyperparameters or the challenges associated with tuning these parameters in practice.

Despite these limitations, the paper makes a significant contribution to the field of multi-objective evolutionary optimization and provides a promising framework for addressing chance-constrained submodular optimization problems. Future research could explore extensions and enhancements to the proposed algorithms, as well as their application to a wider range of real-world scenarios.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new class of sliding window bi-objective evolutionary algorithms for optimizing chance-constrained monotone submodular functions. These algorithms effectively balance exploration and exploitation to find high-quality solutions that satisfy probabilistic constraints.

The theoretical analysis of the runtime and the empirical evaluation on various problem instances demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approach. While the paper has some limitations, it represents an important advancement in the field of multi-objective evolutionary optimization and provides a promising framework for addressing chance-constrained submodular optimization problems, which are relevant in many real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Sliding Window Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing Chance-Constrained Monotone Submodular Functions
Total Score

0

Sliding Window Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing Chance-Constrained Monotone Submodular Functions

Xiankun Yan, Aneta Neumann, Frank Neumann

Variants of the GSEMO algorithm using multi-objective formulations have been successfully analyzed and applied to optimize chance-constrained submodular functions. However, due to the effect of the increasing population size of the GSEMO algorithm considered in these studies from the algorithms, the approach becomes ineffective if the number of trade-offs obtained grows quickly during the optimization run. In this paper, we apply the sliding-selection approach introduced in [21] to the optimization of chance-constrained monotone submodular functions. We theoretically analyze the resulting SW-GSEMO algorithm which successfully limits the population size as a key factor that impacts the runtime and show that this allows it to obtain better runtime guarantees than the best ones currently known for the GSEMO. In our experimental study, we compare the performance of the SW-GSEMO to the GSEMO and NSGA-II on the maximum coverage problem under the chance constraint and show that the SW-GSEMO outperforms the other two approaches in most cases. In order to get additional insights into the optimization behavior of SW-GSEMO, we visualize the selection behavior of SW-GSEMO during its optimization process and show it beats other algorithms to obtain the highest quality of solution in variable instances.

Read more

8/9/2024

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Sliding Window Selection for the Dynamic Chance-Constrained Knapsack Problem
Total Score

0

Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms with Sliding Window Selection for the Dynamic Chance-Constrained Knapsack Problem

Kokila Kasuni Perera, Aneta Neumann

Evolutionary algorithms are particularly effective for optimisation problems with dynamic and stochastic components. We propose multi-objective evolutionary approaches for the knapsack problem with stochastic profits under static and dynamic weight constraints. The chance-constrained problem model allows us to effectively capture the stochastic profits and associate a confidence level to the solutions' profits. We consider a bi-objective formulation that maximises expected profit and minimises variance, which allows optimising the problem independent of a specific confidence level on the profit. We derive a three-objective formulation by relaxing the weight constraint into an additional objective. We consider the GSEMO algorithm with standard and a sliding window-based parent selection to evaluate the objective formulations. Moreover, we modify fitness formulations and algorithms for the dynamic problem variant to store some infeasible solutions to cater to future changes. We conduct experimental investigations on both problems using the proposed problem formulations and algorithms. Our results show that three-objective approaches outperform approaches that use bi-objective formulations, and they further improve when GSEMO uses sliding window selection.

Read more

4/15/2024

Sampling-based Pareto Optimization for Chance-constrained Monotone Submodular Problems
Total Score

0

Sampling-based Pareto Optimization for Chance-constrained Monotone Submodular Problems

Xiankun Yan, Aneta Neumann, Frank Neumann

Recently surrogate functions based on the tail inequalities were developed to evaluate the chance constraints in the context of evolutionary computation and several Pareto optimization algorithms using these surrogates were successfully applied in optimizing chance-constrained monotone submodular problems. However, the difference in performance between algorithms using the surrogates and those employing the direct sampling-based evaluation remains unclear. Within the paper, a sampling-based method is proposed to directly evaluate the chance constraint. Furthermore, to address the problems with more challenging settings, an enhanced GSEMO algorithm integrated with an adaptive sliding window, called ASW-GSEMO, is introduced. In the experiments, the ASW-GSEMO employing the sampling-based approach is tested on the chance-constrained version of the maximum coverage problem with different settings. Its results are compared with those from other algorithms using different surrogate functions. The experimental findings indicate that the ASW-GSEMO with the sampling-based evaluation approach outperforms other algorithms, highlighting that the performances of algorithms using different evaluation methods are comparable. Additionally, the behaviors of ASW-GSEMO are visualized to explain the distinctions between it and the algorithms utilizing the surrogate functions.

Read more

4/19/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Sliding Window 3-Objective Pareto Optimization for Problems with Chance Constraints

Frank Neumann, Carsten Witt

Constrained single-objective problems have been frequently tackled by evolutionary multi-objective algorithms where the constraint is relaxed into an additional objective. Recently, it has been shown that Pareto optimization approaches using bi-objective models can be significantly sped up using sliding windows (Neumann and Witt, ECAI 2023). In this paper, we extend the sliding window approach to $3$-objective formulations for tackling chance constrained problems. On the theoretical side, we show that our new sliding window approach improves previous runtime bounds obtained in (Neumann and Witt, GECCO 2023) while maintaining the same approximation guarantees. Our experimental investigations for the chance constrained dominating set problem show that our new sliding window approach allows one to solve much larger instances in a much more efficient way than the 3-objective approach presented in (Neumann and Witt, GECCO 2023).

Read more

6/10/2024