Nash Learning from Human Feedback
2312.00886
0
0
Abstract
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as the main paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Typically, RLHF involves the initial step of learning a reward model from human feedback, often expressed as preferences between pairs of text generations produced by a pre-trained LLM. Subsequently, the LLM's policy is fine-tuned by optimizing it to maximize the reward model through a reinforcement learning algorithm. However, an inherent limitation of current reward models is their inability to fully represent the richness of human preferences and their dependency on the sampling distribution. In this study, we introduce an alternative pipeline for the fine-tuning of LLMs using pairwise human feedback. Our approach entails the initial learning of a preference model, which is conditioned on two inputs given a prompt, followed by the pursuit of a policy that consistently generates responses preferred over those generated by any competing policy, thus defining the Nash equilibrium of this preference model. We term this approach Nash learning from human feedback (NLHF). In the context of a tabular policy representation, we present a novel algorithmic solution, Nash-MD, founded on the principles of mirror descent. This algorithm produces a sequence of policies, with the last iteration converging to the regularized Nash equilibrium. Additionally, we explore parametric representations of policies and introduce gradient descent algorithms for deep-learning architectures. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we present experimental results involving the fine-tuning of a LLM for a text summarization task. We believe NLHF offers a compelling avenue for preference learning and policy optimization with the potential of advancing the field of aligning LLMs with human preferences.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a novel approach to reinforcement learning (RL) called "Nash Learning from Human Feedback", which aims to align AI systems with human preferences.
- The key idea is to leverage preference-based feedback from humans to guide the training of RL agents, rather than relying solely on reward signals.
- The authors provide theoretical guarantees for this approach and demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments on several benchmark tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way of training AI systems called "Nash Learning from Human Feedback". Traditional reinforcement learning (RL) relies on a system of rewards and punishments to guide an AI agent's behavior. However, this can be challenging, as it's not always easy to specify the right reward function.
The researchers in this paper propose a different approach, where the AI agent learns from human preferences instead of just rewards. Rather than telling the agent what actions to take, humans provide feedback on the agent's behavior, indicating which actions they prefer. The agent then uses this preference information to update its policy and learn to behave in a way that aligns with human values.
This preference-based approach has several advantages. First, it's often easier for humans to express their preferences than to define a precise reward function. Second, it allows the AI system to learn from more nuanced, qualitative feedback rather than just binary rewards. And third, the authors show that this method comes with strong theoretical guarantees, ensuring that the agent will converge to an optimal policy that satisfies human preferences.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their "Nash Learning" approach through experiments on various benchmark tasks. By incorporating human feedback, the AI agents are able to learn policies that better align with human values and preferences, compared to traditional RL methods.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel reinforcement learning (RL) framework called "Nash Learning from Human Feedback" that leverages preference-based feedback from humans to guide the training of RL agents.
In this approach, the agent interacts with a human who provides feedback on the agent's actions, indicating their preferences. The agent then uses this preference information to update its policy through a Nash dynamics update rule, which aims to converge to an equilibrium where the agent's policy satisfies the human's preferences.
The authors provide theoretical guarantees for this approach, showing that under certain assumptions, the Nash dynamics will converge to an optimal policy that satisfies the human's preferences. They also demonstrate the effectiveness of their method through experiments on several benchmark tasks, including grid world navigation, image classification, and robotic manipulation.
Compared to traditional RL approaches that rely solely on reward signals, the preference-based "Nash Learning" framework has several advantages. First, it allows the agent to learn from more nuanced, qualitative feedback rather than just binary rewards. Second, it's often easier for humans to express their preferences than to define a precise reward function. And third, the theoretical guarantees provided in the paper ensure that the agent will converge to an optimal policy that aligns with human values.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to aligning AI systems with human preferences, and the theoretical guarantees are a significant contribution to the field of reinforcement learning from human feedback.
However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The experiments in the paper focus on relatively simple, well-defined tasks. It's not clear how well the "Nash Learning" approach would scale to more complex, real-world problems, where human preferences may be more ambiguous or conflicting.
-
The paper assumes that the human feedback is consistent and unbiased. In practice, human preferences can be influenced by various cognitive biases and inconsistencies. Addressing these challenges is an important area for future research.
-
The paper does not explore the potential for value alignment issues that can arise when training AI systems to optimize for human preferences. Careful consideration of these issues is crucial for the safe and ethical deployment of such systems.
Overall, the "Nash Learning from Human Feedback" approach is a promising step forward in the quest to align AI systems with human values. However, further research and rigorous testing will be necessary to address the potential limitations and ensure the safe and responsible development of these technologies.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel reinforcement learning framework called "Nash Learning from Human Feedback" that leverages preference-based feedback from humans to guide the training of AI agents. By incorporating human preferences, the approach aims to align the agent's behavior with human values, overcoming the limitations of traditional RL methods that rely solely on reward signals.
The authors provide theoretical guarantees for the convergence of their "Nash dynamics" update rule, and demonstrate the effectiveness of their method through experiments on several benchmark tasks. This work represents an important step forward in the field of reinforcement learning from human feedback, with the potential to enable the development of AI systems that are more attuned to human preferences and values.
However, as with any emerging technology, there are still challenges and limitations that will need to be addressed through further research and real-world testing. By continuing to explore and refine these approaches, researchers can work towards the goal of creating AI systems that are truly aligned with human interests and can be safely and responsibly deployed to benefit society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedback
Lior Shani, Aviv Rosenberg, Asaf Cassel, Oran Lang, Daniele Calandriello, Avital Zipori, Hila Noga, Orgad Keller, Bilal Piot, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, R'emi Munos
0
0
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, allowing LLMs to demonstrate remarkable abilities in various tasks. Existing methods work by emulating the preferences at the single decision (turn) level, limiting their capabilities in settings that require planning or multi-turn interactions to achieve a long-term goal. In this paper, we address this issue by developing novel methods for Reinforcement Learning (RL) from preference feedback between two full multi-turn conversations. In the tabular setting, we present a novel mirror-descent-based policy optimization algorithm for the general multi-turn preference-based RL problem, and prove its convergence to Nash equilibrium. To evaluate performance, we create a new environment, Education Dialogue, where a teacher agent guides a student in learning a random topic, and show that a deep RL variant of our algorithm outperforms RLHF baselines. Finally, we show that in an environment with explicit rewards, our algorithm recovers the same performance as a reward-based RL baseline, despite relying solely on a weaker preference signal.
5/24/2024
RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs
Shreyas Chaudhari, Pranjal Aggarwal, Vishvak Murahari, Tanmay Rajpurohit, Ashwin Kalyan, Karthik Narasimhan, Ameet Deshpande, Bruno Castro da Silva
0
0
State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) have become indispensable tools for various tasks. However, training LLMs to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration. A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences and mitigate issues like toxicity and hallucinations. Yet, an understanding of RLHF for LLMs is largely entangled with initial design choices that popularized the method and current research focuses on augmenting those choices rather than fundamentally improving the framework. In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals, dedicating substantial focus to the core component of RLHF -- the reward model. Our study investigates modeling choices, caveats of function approximation, and their implications on RLHF training algorithms, highlighting the underlying assumptions made about the expressivity of reward. Our analysis improves the understanding of the role of reward models and methods for their training, concurrently revealing limitations of the current methodology. We characterize these limitations, including incorrect generalization, model misspecification, and the sparsity of feedback, along with their impact on the performance of a language model. The discussion and analysis are substantiated by a categorical review of current literature, serving as a reference for researchers and practitioners to understand the challenges of RLHF and build upon existing efforts.
4/17/2024
š
A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Timo Kaufmann, Paul Weng, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hullermeier
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a variant of reinforcement learning (RL) that learns from human feedback instead of relying on an engineered reward function. Building on prior work on the related setting of preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL), it stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction. This positioning offers a promising avenue to enhance the performance and adaptability of intelligent systems while also improving the alignment of their objectives with human values. The training of large language models (LLMs) has impressively demonstrated this potential in recent years, where RLHF played a decisive role in directing the model's capabilities toward human objectives. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the fundamentals of RLHF, exploring the intricate dynamics between RL agents and human input. While recent focus has been on RLHF for LLMs, our survey adopts a broader perspective, examining the diverse applications and wide-ranging impact of the technique. We delve into the core principles that underpin RLHF, shedding light on the symbiotic relationship between algorithms and human feedback, and discuss the main research trends in the field. By synthesizing the current landscape of RLHF research, this article aims to provide researchers as well as practitioners with a comprehensive understanding of this rapidly growing field of research.
5/1/2024
š¬
Aligning language models with human preferences
Tomasz Korbak
0
0
Language models (LMs) trained on vast quantities of text data can acquire sophisticated skills such as generating summaries, answering questions or generating code. However, they also manifest behaviors that violate human preferences, e.g., they can generate offensive content, falsehoods or perpetuate social biases. In this thesis, I explore several approaches to aligning LMs with human preferences. First, I argue that aligning LMs can be seen as Bayesian inference: conditioning a prior (base, pretrained LM) on evidence about human preferences (Chapter 2). Conditioning on human preferences can be implemented in numerous ways. In Chapter 3, I investigate the relation between two approaches to finetuning pretrained LMs using feedback given by a scoring function: reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and distribution matching. I show that RLHF can be seen as a special case of distribution matching but distributional matching is strictly more general. In chapter 4, I show how to extend the distribution matching to conditional language models. Finally, in chapter 5 I explore a different root: conditioning an LM on human preferences already during pretraining. I show that involving human feedback from the very start tends to be more effective than using it only during supervised finetuning. Overall, these results highlight the room for alignment techniques different from and complementary to RLHF.
4/19/2024