MultiCorrupt: A Multi-Modal Robustness Dataset and Benchmark of LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection
0
🔎
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Multi-modal 3D object detection models, which use data from both cameras and LiDAR sensors, have demonstrated impressive performance on computer vision benchmarks.
- However, these models face challenges in real-world applications due to issues like sensor misalignment, environmental conditions, and data corruption.
- To address this, researchers have developed MultiCorrupt, a benchmark designed to evaluate the robustness of multi-modal 3D object detectors against various types of data corruptions.
Plain English Explanation
Automated driving systems need to be able to accurately detect and identify objects in the environment, such as other vehicles, pedestrians, and obstacles. Multi-modal 3D object detection models use data from both camera images and LiDAR (laser-based) sensors to achieve this. These models have shown great performance on standardized tests, but they face problems when used in the real world.
One issue is that the sensors in these systems can become misaligned or miscalibrated over time, leading to the camera and LiDAR data not lining up properly. Additionally, the sensors can be affected by things like bad weather, which can cause occlusions (blockages) and introduce noise or interference into the data.
To address these challenges, researchers created MultiCorrupt, a testing platform that simulates different types of data corruption, like sensor misalignment or weather effects. By evaluating how well multi-modal detection models perform on this benchmark, the researchers can understand which approaches are more robust and better able to handle real-world conditions.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed MultiCorrupt, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the robustness of multi-modal 3D object detectors. MultiCorrupt simulates ten distinct types of data corruptions, such as sensor misalignment, miscalibration, and environmental effects like rain, snow, and fog.
The researchers evaluated five state-of-the-art multi-modal 3D object detection models on the MultiCorrupt benchmark. They analyzed the performance of these models in terms of their ability to maintain accurate detection and classification in the presence of different corruptions.
The results show that existing multi-modal detection methods exhibit varying degrees of robustness depending on the type of corruption and the specific fusion strategy employed by the model. The researchers provide insights into which design choices, such as the way the camera and LiDAR data are combined, can make these models more resistant to certain perturbations.
Critical Analysis
The MultiCorrupt benchmark represents an important step in addressing the real-world challenges faced by multi-modal 3D object detection systems. By simulating a diverse range of data corruptions, the benchmark provides a more realistic assessment of model performance compared to standard computer vision benchmarks.
However, it is important to note that the benchmark is limited to simulated corruptions and may not fully capture the complexities of real-world sensor failures and environmental conditions. Continued research and testing on real-world data will be necessary to further understand the limitations and failure modes of these models.
Additionally, the focus of this research is on the robustness of the multi-modal fusion process, but other aspects of the object detection pipeline, such as the individual sensor processing modules, may also be vulnerable to corruption and should be addressed.
Conclusion
The introduction of the MultiCorrupt benchmark represents a significant advancement in the evaluation of multi-modal 3D object detection models for automated driving applications. By assessing the robustness of these models against a wide range of data corruptions, the research provides valuable insights into the design choices that can improve their performance in real-world, challenging environments.
As automated driving systems continue to evolve, the ability to maintain accurate and reliable object detection in the face of sensor failures and environmental conditions will be crucial for ensuring the safety and viability of these technologies. The MultiCorrupt benchmark and the insights gained from this research will contribute to the development of more robust and resilient multi-modal perception systems for the future of autonomous vehicles.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
0
MultiCorrupt: A Multi-Modal Robustness Dataset and Benchmark of LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection
Till Beemelmanns, Quan Zhang, Christian Geller, Lutz Eckstein
Multi-modal 3D object detection models for automated driving have demonstrated exceptional performance on computer vision benchmarks like nuScenes. However, their reliance on densely sampled LiDAR point clouds and meticulously calibrated sensor arrays poses challenges for real-world applications. Issues such as sensor misalignment, miscalibration, and disparate sampling frequencies lead to spatial and temporal misalignment in data from LiDAR and cameras. Additionally, the integrity of LiDAR and camera data is often compromised by adverse environmental conditions such as inclement weather, leading to occlusions and noise interference. To address this challenge, we introduce MultiCorrupt, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the robustness of multi-modal 3D object detectors against ten distinct types of corruptions. We evaluate five state-of-the-art multi-modal detectors on MultiCorrupt and analyze their performance in terms of their resistance ability. Our results show that existing methods exhibit varying degrees of robustness depending on the type of corruption and their fusion strategy. We provide insights into which multi-modal design choices make such models robust against certain perturbations. The dataset generation code and benchmark are open-sourced at https://github.com/ika-rwth-aachen/MultiCorrupt.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Common Corruptions for Enhancing and Evaluating Robustness in Air-to-Air Visual Object Detection
Anastasios Arsenos, Vasileios Karampinis, Evangelos Petrongonas, Christos Skliros, Dimitrios Kollias, Stefanos Kollias, Athanasios Voulodimos
The main barrier to achieving fully autonomous flights lies in autonomous aircraft navigation. Managing non-cooperative traffic presents the most important challenge in this problem. The most efficient strategy for handling non-cooperative traffic is based on monocular video processing through deep learning models. This study contributes to the vision-based deep learning aircraft detection and tracking literature by investigating the impact of data corruption arising from environmental and hardware conditions on the effectiveness of these methods. More specifically, we designed $7$ types of common corruptions for camera inputs taking into account real-world flight conditions. By applying these corruptions to the Airborne Object Tracking (AOT) dataset we constructed the first robustness benchmark dataset named AOT-C for air-to-air aerial object detection. The corruptions included in this dataset cover a wide range of challenging conditions such as adverse weather and sensor noise. The second main contribution of this letter is to present an extensive experimental evaluation involving $8$ diverse object detectors to explore the degradation in the performance under escalating levels of corruptions (domain shifts). Based on the evaluation results, the key observations that emerge are the following: 1) One-stage detectors of the YOLO family demonstrate better robustness, 2) Transformer-based and multi-stage detectors like Faster R-CNN are extremely vulnerable to corruptions, 3) Robustness against corruptions is related to the generalization ability of models. The third main contribution is to present that finetuning on our augmented synthetic data results in improvements in the generalisation ability of the object detector in real-world flight experiments.
Read more5/17/2024
👀
0
New!A Survey on the Robustness of Computer Vision Models against Common Corruptions
Shunxin Wang, Raymond Veldhuis, Christoph Brune, Nicola Strisciuglio
The performance of computer vision models are susceptible to unexpected changes in input images caused by sensor errors or extreme imaging environments, known as common corruptions (e.g. noise, blur, illumination changes). These corruptions can significantly hinder the reliability of these models when deployed in real-world scenarios, yet they are often overlooked when testing model generalization and robustness. In this survey, we present a comprehensive overview of methods that improve the robustness of computer vision models against common corruptions. We categorize methods into three groups based on the model components and training methods they target: data augmentation, learning strategies, and network components. We release a unified benchmark framework (available at url{https://github.com/nis-research/CorruptionBenchCV}) to compare robustness performance across several datasets, and we address the inconsistencies of evaluation practices in the literature. Our experimental analysis highlights the base corruption robustness of popular vision backbones, revealing that corruption robustness does not necessarily scale with model size and data size. Large models gain negligible robustness improvements, considering the increased computational requirements. To achieve generalizable and robust computer vision models, we foresee the need of developing new learning strategies that efficiently exploit limited data and mitigate unreliable learning behaviors.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Multimodal 3D Object Detection on Unseen Domains
Deepti Hegde, Suhas Lohit, Kuan-Chuan Peng, Michael J. Jones, Vishal M. Patel
LiDAR datasets for autonomous driving exhibit biases in properties such as point cloud density, range, and object dimensions. As a result, object detection networks trained and evaluated in different environments often experience performance degradation. Domain adaptation approaches assume access to unannotated samples from the test distribution to address this problem. However, in the real world, the exact conditions of deployment and access to samples representative of the test dataset may be unavailable while training. We argue that the more realistic and challenging formulation is to require robustness in performance to unseen target domains. We propose to address this problem in a two-pronged manner. First, we leverage paired LiDAR-image data present in most autonomous driving datasets to perform multimodal object detection. We suggest that working with multimodal features by leveraging both images and LiDAR point clouds for scene understanding tasks results in object detectors more robust to unseen domain shifts. Second, we train a 3D object detector to learn multimodal object features across different distributions and promote feature invariance across these source domains to improve generalizability to unseen target domains. To this end, we propose CLIX$^text{3D}$, a multimodal fusion and supervised contrastive learning framework for 3D object detection that performs alignment of object features from same-class samples of different domains while pushing the features from different classes apart. We show that CLIX$^text{3D}$ yields state-of-the-art domain generalization performance under multiple dataset shifts.
Read more4/19/2024