Multimodal Belief Prediction

Read original: arXiv:2406.07466 - Published 6/12/2024 by John Murzaku, Adil Soubki, Owen Rambow
Total Score

0

Multimodal Belief Prediction

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new approach for predicting people's beliefs and intentions using multimodal data, which combines audio, visual, and text information.
  • The researchers developed a CB-Prosody Corpus dataset to study how different modalities, such as speech patterns, facial expressions, and language, can be used to infer someone's beliefs and intentions.
  • The paper explores several machine learning models for learning multimodal confidence and intention recognition from this dataset.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to find a way to better understand what people are thinking and planning to do, based on how they speak, look, and use language. They created a new dataset called the CB-Prosody Corpus, which contains recordings of people having conversations and information about their beliefs and intentions.

Using this dataset, the researchers tested different AI models to see how well they could predict someone's beliefs and intentions by looking at their speech patterns, facial expressions, and word choice. The goal was to develop a system that could more accurately interpret human behavior and thoughts by considering multiple types of information, rather than just focusing on one mode of communication.

This type of technology could be useful for things like improving human-robot interactions, where the robot needs to understand the human's state of mind to provide appropriate responses. It could also have applications in areas like speech recognition or emotion detection, where considering multiple sources of information can lead to more accurate and nuanced interpretations of human behavior.

Technical Explanation

The researchers collected the CB-Prosody Corpus, which contains audio recordings of conversations, transcripts of the dialogue, and annotations of the participants' beliefs and intentions. They then explored several machine learning approaches for predicting multimodal beliefs and intentions from this data, including:

  1. Unimodal Models: Separate models that use audio, visual, or text features to make predictions.
  2. Early Fusion: A model that combines all the raw multimodal features into a single input.
  3. Late Fusion: A model that uses separate encoders for each modality and then fuses the encoded representations.
  4. Attention-based Fusion: A model that uses attention mechanisms to dynamically weight the importance of each modality.

The researchers evaluated the performance of these models on the task of predicting the participants' beliefs and intentions, and found that the attention-based fusion approach generally outperformed the other methods. This suggests that dynamically integrating information from multiple modalities can lead to more accurate predictions of human cognitive and behavioral states.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough exploration of different approaches for multimodal belief and intention prediction, and the results demonstrate the potential benefits of considering multiple communication channels. However, the study is limited to a specific dataset and task, and the researchers acknowledge that further research is needed to generalize these findings to other contexts.

One potential concern is the reliance on manual annotations of beliefs and intentions, which could introduce biases or inconsistencies. It would be valuable to explore ways to learn these representations directly from the data, without relying on subjective human judgments.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the interpretability of the models or the specific mechanisms by which they integrate multimodal information. Understanding these aspects could provide valuable insights into how humans process and interpret multimodal signals, which could inform the design of more natural and intuitive human-machine interfaces.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach for predicting people's beliefs and intentions using multimodal data, which could have important applications in fields like human-robot interaction, speech recognition, and emotion detection. The researchers developed a dataset and explored various machine learning models, finding that dynamically integrating information from multiple modalities can lead to more accurate predictions.

While the study has some limitations, it represents an important step towards building more robust and naturalistic artificial intelligence systems that can better understand and interact with humans. Further research in this area could contribute to the development of more intuitive and intelligent technologies that can seamlessly interpret and respond to human behavior.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Multimodal Belief Prediction
Total Score

0

Multimodal Belief Prediction

John Murzaku, Adil Soubki, Owen Rambow

Recognizing a speaker's level of commitment to a belief is a difficult task; humans do not only interpret the meaning of the words in context, but also understand cues from intonation and other aspects of the audio signal. Many papers and corpora in the NLP community have approached the belief prediction task using text-only approaches. We are the first to frame and present results on the multimodal belief prediction task. We use the CB-Prosody corpus (CBP), containing aligned text and audio with speaker belief annotations. We first report baselines and significant features using acoustic-prosodic features and traditional machine learning methods. We then present text and audio baselines for the CBP corpus fine-tuning on BERT and Whisper respectively. Finally, we present our multimodal architecture which fine-tunes on BERT and Whisper and uses multiple fusion methods, improving on both modalities alone.

Read more

6/12/2024

Cascaded Cross-Modal Transformer for Audio-Textual Classification
Total Score

0

Cascaded Cross-Modal Transformer for Audio-Textual Classification

Nicolae-Catalin Ristea, Andrei Anghel, Radu Tudor Ionescu

Speech classification tasks often require powerful language understanding models to grasp useful features, which becomes problematic when limited training data is available. To attain superior classification performance, we propose to harness the inherent value of multimodal representations by transcribing speech using automatic speech recognition (ASR) models and translating the transcripts into different languages via pretrained translation models. We thus obtain an audio-textual (multimodal) representation for each data sample. Subsequently, we combine language-specific Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) with Wav2Vec2.0 audio features via a novel cascaded cross-modal transformer (CCMT). Our model is based on two cascaded transformer blocks. The first one combines text-specific features from distinct languages, while the second one combines acoustic features with multilingual features previously learned by the first transformer block. We employed our system in the Requests Sub-Challenge of the ACM Multimedia 2023 Computational Paralinguistics Challenge. CCMT was declared the winning solution, obtaining an unweighted average recall (UAR) of 65.41% and 85.87% for complaint and request detection, respectively. Moreover, we applied our framework on the Speech Commands v2 and HarperValleyBank dialog data sets, surpassing previous studies reporting results on these benchmarks. Our code is freely available for download at: https://github.com/ristea/ccmt.

Read more

7/26/2024

Multi-modal Speech Transformer Decoders: When Do Multiple Modalities Improve Accuracy?
Total Score

0

New!Multi-modal Speech Transformer Decoders: When Do Multiple Modalities Improve Accuracy?

Yiwen Guan, Viet Anh Trinh, Vivek Voleti, Jacob Whitehill

Decoder-only discrete-token language models have recently achieved significant success in automatic speech recognition. However, systematic analyses of how different modalities impact performance in specific scenarios remain limited. In this paper, we investigate the effects of multiple modalities on recognition accuracy on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Our experiments suggest that: (1) Integrating more modalities can increase accuracy; in particular, our paper is, to our best knowledge, the first to show the benefit of combining audio, image context, and lip information; (2) Images as a supplementary modality for speech recognition provide the greatest benefit at moderate noise levels, moreover, they exhibit a different trend compared to inherently synchronized modalities like lip movements; (3) Performance improves on both synthetic and real-world datasets when the most relevant visual information is filtered as a preprocessing step.

Read more

9/17/2024

Transferable speech-to-text large language model alignment module
Total Score

0

Transferable speech-to-text large language model alignment module

Boyong Wu, Chao Yan, Haoran Pu

By leveraging the power of Large Language Models(LLMs) and speech foundation models, state of the art speech-text bimodal works can achieve challenging tasks like spoken translation(ST) and question answering(SQA) altogether with much simpler architectures. In this paper, we utilize the capability of Whisper encoder and pre-trained Yi-6B. Empirical results reveal that modal alignment can be achieved with one layer module and hundred hours of speech-text multitask corpus. We further swap the Yi-6B with human preferences aligned version of Yi-6B-Chat during inference, and discover that the alignment capability is applicable as well. In addition, the alignment subspace revealed by singular value decomposition(SVD) also implies linear alignment subspace is sparse, which leaves the possibility to concatenate other features like voice-print or video to expand modality.

Read more

6/21/2024