Multiplicative Reweighting for Robust Neural Network Optimization

Read original: arXiv:2102.12192 - Published 5/28/2024 by Noga Bar, Tomer Koren, Raja Giryes
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Neural networks are powerful but can degrade in the presence of noisy labels during training.
  • The paper proposes using a multiplicative weight (MW) update method to reweight examples during neural network optimization, inspired by the robustness of MW to moderate data corruptions in the "learning with expert advice" setting.
  • The method is theoretically analyzed and validated empirically on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Clothing1M datasets, showing improved accuracy in the presence of label noise and enhanced adversarial robustness.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks are a type of machine learning model that have become very popular due to their strong performance on a variety of tasks. However, one weakness of neural networks is that their performance can degrade when the training data contains noisy or inaccurate labels.

The paper proposes a solution inspired by a technique called "learning with expert advice." In this setting, a method called "multiplicative weight (MW) updates" has been shown to be robust to moderate corruptions in the expert advice. The researchers hypothesized that using a similar MW update approach could help neural networks be more resilient to noisy labels during training.

The key idea is to use the MW update method to reweight the training examples, giving more importance to the clean, accurate examples and less to the noisy ones. This helps the neural network focus on learning from the high-quality data and reduces the negative impact of the low-quality data.

The researchers provide a theoretical analysis showing the benefits of this approach and then validate it empirically on several benchmark datasets, demonstrating improved accuracy in the presence of label noise. They also show that their method can enhance the adversarial robustness of the trained neural networks.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a method for training neural networks that is more robust to noisy labels in the training data. Inspired by the "learning with expert advice" setting, where multiplicative weight (MW) updates have been shown to be effective in the presence of moderate data corruptions, the researchers apply a similar MW update approach to reweight training examples during neural network optimization.

Theoretically, the authors establish the convergence of their MW-based method when used with gradient descent optimization and prove its advantages in 1D cases. They then empirically validate their findings on the more general case, demonstrating that their MW-based reweighting improves the accuracy of neural networks trained on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Clothing1M datasets in the presence of label noise.

Additionally, the paper explores the impact of the proposed approach on the adversarial robustness of the trained neural networks, showing enhancements in this area as well.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling approach to making neural networks more robust to noisy labels during training. The theoretical analysis and empirical validation on several benchmark datasets are thorough and well-executed.

One potential limitation worth considering is the scalability of the MW-based reweighting approach. While it demonstrated benefits in the evaluated settings, it's unclear how the method would perform as the dataset size and complexity increases. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational overhead of the reweighting process and how it might impact the overall training efficiency.

Another area for further exploration is the interaction between the proposed method and other techniques designed to improve generalization or boost fair classifier generalization. Combining the MW-based reweighting with these complementary approaches could lead to even stronger and more robust neural network models.

Overall, the paper presents a promising direction for enhancing the reliability of neural networks in the presence of noisy labels, which is an important practical challenge. Further research and real-world deployments will help validate the broader applicability and potential of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel method for training neural networks that is more robust to noisy labels in the training data. By adapting a multiplicative weight (MW) update technique from the "learning with expert advice" setting, the researchers develop a reweighting approach that helps neural networks focus on learning from high-quality examples and mitigate the negative impact of low-quality, noisy data.

The theoretical and empirical analyses demonstrate the benefits of this method, including improved accuracy on benchmark datasets with label noise and enhanced adversarial robustness of the trained models. This work contributes to the ongoing efforts to make neural networks more reliable and trustworthy in real-world applications, where noisy or corrupted data is a common challenge.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

Multiplicative Reweighting for Robust Neural Network Optimization

Noga Bar, Tomer Koren, Raja Giryes

Neural networks are widespread due to their powerful performance. However, they degrade in the presence of noisy labels at training time. Inspired by the setting of learning with expert advice, where multiplicative weight (MW) updates were recently shown to be robust to moderate data corruptions in expert advice, we propose to use MW for reweighting examples during neural networks optimization. We theoretically establish the convergence of our method when used with gradient descent and prove its advantages in 1d cases. We then validate our findings empirically for the general case by showing that MW improves the accuracy of neural networks in the presence of label noise on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and Clothing1M. We also show the impact of our approach on adversarial robustness.

Read more

5/28/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Reimplementation of Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learning

Parth Patil, Ben Boardley, Jack Gardner, Emily Loiselle, Deerajkumar Parthipan

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been used to create models for many complex analysis problems like image recognition and medical diagnosis. DNNs are a popular tool within machine learning due to their ability to model complex patterns and distributions. However, the performance of these networks is highly dependent on the quality of the data used to train the models. Two characteristics of these sets, noisy labels and training set biases, are known to frequently cause poor generalization performance as a result of overfitting to the training set. This paper aims to solve this problem using the approach proposed by Ren et al. (2018) using meta-training and online weight approximation. We will first implement a toy-problem to crudely verify the claims made by the authors of Ren et al. (2018) and then venture into using the approach to solve a real world problem of Skin-cancer detection using an imbalanced image dataset.

Read more

5/14/2024

Analytical Uncertainty-Based Loss Weighting in Multi-Task Learning
Total Score

0

Analytical Uncertainty-Based Loss Weighting in Multi-Task Learning

Lukas Kirchdorfer, Cathrin Elich, Simon Kutsche, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Lukas Schott, Jan M. Kohler

With the rise of neural networks in various domains, multi-task learning (MTL) gained significant relevance. A key challenge in MTL is balancing individual task losses during neural network training to improve performance and efficiency through knowledge sharing across tasks. To address these challenges, we propose a novel task-weighting method by building on the most prevalent approach of Uncertainty Weighting and computing analytically optimal uncertainty-based weights, normalized by a softmax function with tunable temperature. Our approach yields comparable results to the combinatorially prohibitive, brute-force approach of Scalarization while offering a more cost-effective yet high-performing alternative. We conduct an extensive benchmark on various datasets and architectures. Our method consistently outperforms six other common weighting methods. Furthermore, we report noteworthy experimental findings for the practical application of MTL. For example, larger networks diminish the influence of weighting methods, and tuning the weight decay has a low impact compared to the learning rate.

Read more

8/16/2024

Improving robustness to corruptions with multiplicative weight perturbations
Total Score

0

Improving robustness to corruptions with multiplicative weight perturbations

Trung Trinh, Markus Heinonen, Luigi Acerbi, Samuel Kaski

Deep neural networks (DNNs) excel on clean images but struggle with corrupted ones. Incorporating specific corruptions into the data augmentation pipeline can improve robustness to those corruptions but may harm performance on clean images and other types of distortion. In this paper, we introduce an alternative approach that improves the robustness of DNNs to a wide range of corruptions without compromising accuracy on clean images. We first demonstrate that input perturbations can be mimicked by multiplicative perturbations in the weight space. Leveraging this, we propose Data Augmentation via Multiplicative Perturbation (DAMP), a training method that optimizes DNNs under random multiplicative weight perturbations. We also examine the recently proposed Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization (ASAM) and show that it optimizes DNNs under adversarial multiplicative weight perturbations. Experiments on image classification datasets (CIFAR-10/100, TinyImageNet and ImageNet) and neural network architectures (ResNet50, ViT-S/16) show that DAMP enhances model generalization performance in the presence of corruptions across different settings. Notably, DAMP is able to train a ViT-S/16 on ImageNet from scratch, reaching the top-1 error of 23.7% which is comparable to ResNet50 without extensive data augmentations.

Read more

6/26/2024