MuMA-ToM: Multi-modal Multi-Agent Theory of Mind
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a multi-modal, multi-agent "Theory of Mind" framework for AI systems
- Aims to enable AI agents to better understand and reason about the mental states of other agents, both human and artificial
- Potential applications in areas like human-AI collaboration, communication, and question answering
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new approach called "MuMA-ToM" (Multi-modal Multi-Agent Theory of Mind) that enables AI systems to better understand the thoughts, beliefs, and intentions of other agents, whether they are human or artificial.
The key idea is that by combining information from multiple modalities (e.g., language, vision, gestures) and reasoning about the mental states of multiple agents simultaneously, AI systems can develop a more sophisticated "theory of mind" - the ability to infer and reason about what others are thinking and feeling.
This could be highly valuable in applications where AI needs to collaborate with humans or other AI agents, communicate effectively, or answer questions that require understanding complex social and mental dynamics. For example, an AI assistant might use MuMA-ToM to better interpret a user's intentions and provide more helpful and contextual responses.
Overall, the MuMA-ToM framework aims to make AI systems more socially and cognitively capable, allowing them to navigate the nuances of human-AI and multi-agent interactions.
Technical Explanation
The MuMA-ToM framework is designed to enable AI agents to develop a "theory of mind" - the ability to reason about the mental states, beliefs, and intentions of other agents. It combines information from multiple modalities, including language, vision, and gesture, to build a more comprehensive understanding of the agents involved in a given interaction or scenario.
At the core of the MuMA-ToM approach is a multi-agent architecture that allows the AI system to model the beliefs, desires, and intentions of multiple agents simultaneously. This "multi-agent" aspect is key, as it enables the system to reason about the complex social dynamics and recursive mental representations that arise in real-world interactions.
The framework also incorporates mechanisms for learning and updating these mental models over time, allowing the AI agent to refine its theory of mind as it gains more experience and observes the behavior of other agents. This dynamic, multi-modal, and multi-agent approach sets MuMA-ToM apart from more traditional single-agent or unimodal theory of mind models.
Through experiments and evaluations, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of MuMA-ToM in tasks like question answering, where the ability to reason about the mental states of both the questioner and the answerer is crucial for providing relevant and insightful responses.
Critical Analysis
The MuMA-ToM framework represents a significant advance in the field of AI theory of mind, as it addresses several limitations of previous approaches. By incorporating multiple modalities and modeling multiple agents simultaneously, the system can capture the rich complexity of real-world social and cognitive interactions.
However, the paper also acknowledges several potential limitations and areas for future research. For example, the current implementation may struggle with highly ambiguous or deceptive scenarios, where agents are actively trying to mislead or hide their true mental states. Additionally, the computational and memory requirements of the multi-agent reasoning processes could pose challenges for scaling the system to large-scale, real-world applications.
Further research might also explore ways to make the theory of mind models more interpretable and transparent, allowing human users to better understand the reasoning processes of the AI system. This could be particularly important in sensitive domains like healthcare or education, where trust and accountability are critical.
Overall, the MuMA-ToM framework represents an important step towards developing AI systems that can engage in more natural, socially-aware, and collaborative interactions with humans and other agents. As the field of AI continues to advance, frameworks like this will be increasingly important for bridging the gap between artificial and human intelligence.
Conclusion
The MuMA-ToM framework proposed in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of AI theory of mind. By combining multi-modal information and multi-agent reasoning, the system can develop a more sophisticated understanding of the mental states and social dynamics involved in complex interactions.
This capability has important implications for a wide range of AI applications, from human-AI collaboration to more natural language communication and question answering. As the field of AI continues to evolve, frameworks like MuMA-ToM will play a crucial role in enabling AI systems to engage with the world in a more socially and cognitively adept manner.
While the current implementation has some limitations, the authors have laid the groundwork for further research and development in this critical area of AI. By continuing to push the boundaries of theory of mind in artificial systems, we can work towards a future where AI and humans can collaborate, communicate, and understand each other more effectively.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MuMA-ToM: Multi-modal Multi-Agent Theory of Mind
Haojun Shi, Suyu Ye, Xinyu Fang, Chuanyang Jin, Leyla Isik, Yen-Ling Kuo, Tianmin Shu
Understanding people's social interactions in complex real-world scenarios often relies on intricate mental reasoning. To truly understand how and why people interact with one another, we must infer the underlying mental states that give rise to the social interactions, i.e., Theory of Mind reasoning in multi-agent interactions. Additionally, social interactions are often multi-modal -- we can watch people's actions, hear their conversations, and/or read about their past behaviors. For AI systems to successfully and safely interact with people in real-world environments, they also need to understand people's mental states as well as their inferences about each other's mental states based on multi-modal information about their interactions. For this, we introduce MuMA-ToM, a Multi-modal Multi-Agent Theory of Mind benchmark. MuMA-ToM is the first multi-modal Theory of Mind benchmark that evaluates mental reasoning in embodied multi-agent interactions. In MuMA-ToM, we provide video and text descriptions of people's multi-modal behavior in realistic household environments. Based on the context, we then ask questions about people's goals, beliefs, and beliefs about others' goals. We validated MuMA-ToM in a human experiment and provided a human baseline. We also proposed a novel multi-modal, multi-agent ToM model, LIMP (Language model-based Inverse Multi-agent Planning). Our experimental results show that LIMP significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, including large multi-modal models (e.g., GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5 Pro) and a recent multi-modal ToM model, BIP-ALM.
Read more8/27/2024
0
MMToM-QA: Multimodal Theory of Mind Question Answering
Chuanyang Jin, Yutong Wu, Jing Cao, Jiannan Xiang, Yen-Ling Kuo, Zhiting Hu, Tomer Ullman, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Tianmin Shu
Theory of Mind (ToM), the ability to understand people's mental states, is an essential ingredient for developing machines with human-level social intelligence. Recent machine learning models, particularly large language models, seem to show some aspects of ToM understanding. However, existing ToM benchmarks use unimodal datasets - either video or text. Human ToM, on the other hand, is more than video or text understanding. People can flexibly reason about another person's mind based on conceptual representations (e.g., goals, beliefs, plans) extracted from any available data. To address this, we introduce a multimodal Theory of Mind question answering (MMToM-QA) benchmark. MMToM-QA comprehensively evaluates machine ToM both on multimodal data and on different kinds of unimodal data about a person's activity in a household environment. To engineer multimodal ToM capacity, we propose a novel method, BIP-ALM (Bayesian Inverse Planning Accelerated by Language Models). BIP-ALM extracts unified representations from multimodal data and utilizes language models for scalable Bayesian inverse planning. We conducted a systematic comparison of human performance, BIP-ALM, and state-of-the-art models, including GPT-4. The experiments demonstrate that large language models and large multimodal models still lack robust ToM capacity. BIP-ALM, on the other hand, shows promising results, by leveraging the power of both model-based mental inference and language models.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task
Shao Zhang, Xihuai Wang, Wenhao Zhang, Yongshan Chen, Landi Gao, Dakuo Wang, Weinan Zhang, Xinbing Wang, Ying Wen
Theory of Mind (ToM) significantly impacts human collaboration and communication as a crucial capability to understand others. When AI agents with ToM capability collaborate with humans, Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) arises in such human-AI teams (HATs). The MToM process, which involves interactive communication and ToM-based strategy adjustment, affects the team's performance and collaboration process. To explore the MToM process, we conducted a mixed-design experiment using a large language model-driven AI agent with ToM and communication modules in a real-time shared-workspace task. We find that the agent's ToM capability does not significantly impact team performance but enhances human understanding of the agent and the feeling of being understood. Most participants in our study believe verbal communication increases human burden, and the results show that bidirectional communication leads to lower HAT performance. We discuss the results' implications for designing AI agents that collaborate with humans in real-time shared workspace tasks.
Read more9/16/2024
0
Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models
Huao Li, Yu Quan Chong, Simon Stepputtis, Joseph Campbell, Dana Hughes, Michael Lewis, Katia Sycara
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive accomplishments in both reasoning and planning, their abilities in multi-agent collaborations remains largely unexplored. This study evaluates LLM-based agents in a multi-agent cooperative text game with Theory of Mind (ToM) inference tasks, comparing their performance with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) and planning-based baselines. We observed evidence of emergent collaborative behaviors and high-order Theory of Mind capabilities among LLM-based agents. Our results reveal limitations in LLM-based agents' planning optimization due to systematic failures in managing long-horizon contexts and hallucination about the task state. We explore the use of explicit belief state representations to mitigate these issues, finding that it enhances task performance and the accuracy of ToM inferences for LLM-based agents.
Read more6/28/2024