Natural Language Embedded Programs for Hybrid Language Symbolic Reasoning
2309.10814
1
0
Abstract
How can we perform computations over natural language representations to solve tasks that require symbolic and numeric reasoning? We propose natural language embedded programs (NLEP) as a unifying framework for addressing math/symbolic reasoning, natural language understanding, and instruction following tasks. Our approach prompts a language model to generate full Python programs that define functions over data structures which contain natural language representations of structured knowledge. A Python interpreter then executes the generated code and prints the output. Despite using a task-general prompt, we find that this approach can improve upon strong baselines across a range of different tasks including math and symbolic reasoning, text classification, question answering, and instruction following. We found that the generated programs are interpretable since they outline the exact reasoning process followed by the program interpreter.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
This paper presents a new approach called Natural Language Embedded Programs (NLEP) for enabling large language models to perform symbolic reasoning tasks by embedding programs within natural language prompts. The key idea is to leverage the model's ability to understand and generate natural language while providing explicit symbolic instructions to guide its reasoning process. This approach has the potential to expand the capabilities of language models beyond pure text generation and enable them to solve complex problems that require structured reasoning.
The research is particularly relevant for individuals and organizations working on developing and deploying large language models for practical applications. It addresses a fundamental limitation of current language models, which excel at understanding and generating natural language but struggle with tasks that require structured reasoning or manipulation of symbolic representations. By integrating symbolic programs into natural language prompts, this work opens up new avenues for leveraging the power of language models in domains such as mathematics, logic, and programming.
Key Themes and Findings
Hybrid Language Reasoning
The paper introduces the concept of hybrid language reasoning, which combines natural language understanding with symbolic reasoning capabilities. This approach aims to bridge the gap between the excellent language understanding abilities of large language models and their limitations in performing structured reasoning tasks. By embedding symbolic programs within natural language prompts, the models can leverage their language understanding to interpret the prompts and then execute the symbolic programs to perform the desired reasoning tasks.
Natural Language Embedded Programs (NLEP)
The core contribution of the paper is the introduction of Natural Language Embedded Programs (NLEP), a novel prompting technique that allows language models to execute symbolic programs embedded within natural language prompts. The NLEP approach involves designing a specialized prompting format that includes both natural language instructions and symbolic program snippets. The language model is then tasked with interpreting the prompt, executing the symbolic program, and generating the appropriate output based on the program's execution.
Empirical Evaluation
The paper presents empirical evaluations of the NLEP approach on a variety of symbolic reasoning tasks, including arithmetic, logical reasoning, and program execution. The results demonstrate that language models equipped with NLEP prompting can successfully perform these tasks, outperforming baseline models that rely solely on natural language prompts or symbolic programs without natural language context.
Analysis and Implications
Limitations and Future Work
While the NLEP approach shows promising results, the paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for future improvement. One limitation is the need for careful prompt engineering to design effective NLEP prompts, which can be a time-consuming and challenging process. Additionally, the paper notes that the current approach may not scale well to more complex tasks or larger symbolic programs. Future work could focus on developing more efficient and scalable techniques for integrating symbolic reasoning capabilities into language models.
Broader Implications
The NLEP approach has the potential to significantly broaden the applicability of large language models in domains that require structured reasoning and symbolic manipulation. By enabling language models to perform tasks such as mathematical problem-solving, logical deduction, and program execution, this work paves the way for developing more intelligent and capable AI systems that can assist humans in a wider range of cognitive tasks. As the field of natural language processing continues to advance, the integration of symbolic reasoning capabilities could lead to the development of more powerful and versatile AI assistants, with applications across various industries and domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Language Models as Compilers: Simulating Pseudocode Execution Improves Algorithmic Reasoning in Language Models
Hyungjoo Chae, Yeonghyeon Kim, Seungone Kim, Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Beong-woo Kwak, Moohyeon Kim, Seonghwan Kim, Taeyoon Kwon, Jiwan Chung, Youngjae Yu, Jinyoung Yeo
0
0
Algorithmic reasoning refers to the ability to understand the complex patterns behind the problem and decompose them into a sequence of reasoning steps towards the solution. Such nature of algorithmic reasoning makes it a challenge for large language models (LLMs), even though they have demonstrated promising performance in other reasoning tasks. Within this context, some recent studies use programming languages (e.g., Python) to express the necessary logic for solving a given instance/question (e.g., Program-of-Thought) as inspired by their strict and precise syntaxes. However, it is non-trivial to write an executable code that expresses the correct logic on the fly within a single inference call. Also, the code generated specifically for an instance cannot be reused for others, even if they are from the same task and might require identical logic to solve. This paper presents Think-and-Execute, a novel framework that decomposes the reasoning process of language models into two steps. (1) In Think, we discover a task-level logic that is shared across all instances for solving a given task and then express the logic with pseudocode; (2) In Execute, we further tailor the generated pseudocode to each instance and simulate the execution of the code. With extensive experiments on seven algorithmic reasoning tasks, we demonstrate the effectiveness of Think-and-Execute. Our approach better improves LMs' reasoning compared to several strong baselines performing instance-specific reasoning (e.g., CoT and PoT), suggesting the helpfulness of discovering task-level logic. Also, we show that compared to natural language, pseudocode can better guide the reasoning of LMs, even though they are trained to follow natural language instructions.
4/4/2024
💬
NExT: Teaching Large Language Models to Reason about Code Execution
Ansong Ni, Miltiadis Allamanis, Arman Cohan, Yinlin Deng, Kensen Shi, Charles Sutton, Pengcheng Yin
0
0
A fundamental skill among human developers is the ability to understand and reason about program execution. As an example, a programmer can mentally simulate code execution in natural language to debug and repair code (aka. rubber duck debugging). However, large language models (LLMs) of code are typically trained on the surface textual form of programs, thus may lack a semantic understanding of how programs execute at run-time. To address this issue, we propose NExT, a method to teach LLMs to inspect the execution traces of programs (variable states of executed lines) and reason about their run-time behavior through chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales. Specifically, NExT uses self-training to bootstrap a synthetic training set of execution-aware rationales that lead to correct task solutions (e.g., fixed programs) without laborious manual annotation. Experiments on program repair tasks based on MBPP and HumanEval demonstrate that NExT improves the fix rate of a PaLM 2 model, by 26.1% and 14.3% absolute, respectively, with significantly improved rationale quality as verified by automated metrics and human raters. Our model can also generalize to scenarios where program traces are absent at test-time.
4/24/2024
Natural Language as Policies: Reasoning for Coordinate-Level Embodied Control with LLMs
Yusuke Mikami, Andrew Melnik, Jun Miura, Ville Hautamaki
0
0
We demonstrate experimental results with LLMs that address robotics task planning problems. Recently, LLMs have been applied in robotics task planning, particularly using a code generation approach that converts complex high-level instructions into mid-level policy codes. In contrast, our approach acquires text descriptions of the task and scene objects, then formulates task planning through natural language reasoning, and outputs coordinate level control commands, thus reducing the necessity for intermediate representation code as policies with pre-defined APIs. Our approach is evaluated on a multi-modal prompt simulation benchmark, demonstrating that our prompt engineering experiments with natural language reasoning significantly enhance success rates compared to its absence. Furthermore, our approach illustrates the potential for natural language descriptions to transfer robotics skills from known tasks to previously unseen tasks. The project website: https://natural-language-as-policies.github.io/
4/9/2024
🌿
Verification and Refinement of Natural Language Explanations through LLM-Symbolic Theorem Proving
Xin Quan, Marco Valentino, Louise A. Dennis, Andr'e Freitas
0
0
Natural language explanations have become a proxy for evaluating explainable and multi-step Natural Language Inference (NLI) models. However, assessing the validity of explanations for NLI is challenging as it typically involves the crowd-sourcing of apposite datasets, a process that is time-consuming and prone to logical errors. To address existing limitations, this paper investigates the verification and refinement of natural language explanations through the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Theorem Provers (TPs). Specifically, we present a neuro-symbolic framework, named Explanation-Refiner, that augments a TP with LLMs to generate and formalise explanatory sentences and suggest potential inference strategies for NLI. In turn, the TP is employed to provide formal guarantees on the logical validity of the explanations and to generate feedback for subsequent improvements. We demonstrate how Explanation-Refiner can be jointly used to evaluate explanatory reasoning, autoformalisation, and error correction mechanisms of state-of-the-art LLMs as well as to automatically enhance the quality of human-annotated explanations of variable complexity in different domains.
5/9/2024