Verification and Refinement of Natural Language Explanations through LLM-Symbolic Theorem Proving

Overview

• This paper investigates using large language models (LLMs) and theorem provers (TPs) to verify and refine natural language explanations for natural language inference (NLI) tasks.
• The authors present a "neuro-symbolic framework" called Explanation-Refiner that combines LLMs and TPs to generate, formalize, and validate explanatory sentences for NLI.
• The goal is to address limitations in existing approaches that rely on crowd-sourcing datasets, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors.

Plain English Explanation

When it comes to evaluating explainable and multi-step natural language inference (NLI) models, one common approach is to look at the natural language explanations these models produce. However, assessing the validity of these explanations can be challenging, as it often involves crowd-sourcing datasets, which can be time-consuming and prone to mistakes.

To address this issue, the researchers in this paper explored a new way to verify and refine natural language explanations. They developed a "neuro-symbolic framework" called Explanation-Refiner that combines large language models (LLMs) and theorem provers (TPs). The LLMs are used to generate and formalize the explanatory sentences, while the TPs are used to check the logical validity of the explanations and provide feedback for improving them.

The key idea is to leverage the strengths of both LLMs and TPs to create a more robust and reliable system for evaluating explanatory reasoning, automating the formalization process, and correcting errors in NLI explanations. The researchers demonstrate how Explanation-Refiner can be used to enhance the quality of human-annotated explanations across different domains.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a neuro-symbolic framework called Explanation-Refiner that integrates large language models (LLMs) and theorem provers (TPs) to generate, formalize, and validate natural language explanations for natural language inference (NLI) tasks.

The framework works as follows:

1. The LLM is used to produce explanatory sentences that describe the reasoning process for a given NLI example.
2. These sentences are then "formalized" by the LLM, converting them into a more structured, logical format that can be processed by the TP.
3. The TP evaluates the logical validity of the explanations and provides feedback, which is used to refine the explanations.

This iterative process allows the system to automatically enhance the quality of the explanations, addressing limitations in existing approaches that rely on crowd-sourced datasets, which can be time-consuming and prone to logical errors.

The key technical contributions of the paper include:

• The Explanation-Refiner architecture that combines LLMs and TPs for explanation generation, formalization, and verification.
• Techniques for using LLMs to generate and auto-formalize natural language explanations.
• Algorithms for integrating the TP feedback to refine the explanations.
• Experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of Explanation-Refiner in evaluating and improving the explanatory reasoning of state-of-the-art LLMs, as well as enhancing human-annotated explanations across different domains.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to addressing the challenges in evaluating natural language explanations for NLI models. By integrating LLMs and TPs, the Explanation-Refiner framework offers a more systematic and rigorous way to verify the logical validity of the explanations.

One potential limitation is the reliance on the accuracy and capabilities of the LLMs and TPs used in the system. If the underlying models have biases or limitations, these could be reflected in the generated and refined explanations. The authors acknowledge this and suggest further research to improve the robustness and generalization of the system.

Additionally, the paper focuses on NLI tasks, but the authors note that the approach could be extended to other domains that require complex reasoning and explanations. Further research would be needed to validate the framework's applicability beyond the NLI setting.

Overall, the Explanation-Refiner framework represents a significant step forward in addressing the challenges of evaluating the explanatory capabilities of large language models. The integration of LLMs and TPs offers a promising direction for improving the reliability and usefulness of natural language explanations in AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel neuro-symbolic framework called Explanation-Refiner that combines large language models (LLMs) and theorem provers (TPs) to generate, formalize, and validate natural language explanations for natural language inference (NLI) tasks.

By leveraging the complementary strengths of LLMs and TPs, Explanation-Refiner addresses the limitations of existing approaches that rely on crowd-sourced datasets, which can be time-consuming and prone to logical errors. The framework demonstrates how it can be used to evaluate the explanatory reasoning of state-of-the-art LLMs, as well as enhance the quality of human-annotated explanations across different domains.

The Explanation-Refiner approach represents a significant step forward in improving the reliability and usefulness of natural language explanations in AI systems. As the field of explainable AI continues to evolve, this type of neuro-symbolic integration could become an increasingly important tool for ensuring the logical validity and transparency of complex AI models.