Natural Language Outlines for Code: Literate Programming in the LLM Era

Read original: arXiv:2408.04820 - Published 8/16/2024 by Kensen Shi, Deniz Alt{i}nbuken, Saswat Anand, Mihai Christodorescu, Katja Grunwedel, Alexa Koenings, Sai Naidu, Anurag Pathak, Marc Rasi, Fredde Ribeiro and 10 others
Total Score

0

Natural Language Outlines for Code: Literate Programming in the LLM Era

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the potential of using large language models (LLMs) to generate natural language outlines for code, enabling a new era of literate programming.
  • The authors propose a system called NLO (Natural Language Outlines) that can translate high-level natural language descriptions into well-structured code outlines.
  • The paper discusses the design and implementation of the NLO system, as well as its evaluation and potential applications.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new approach to writing code called "Natural Language Outlines" (NLO). The core idea is to use powerful language models, known as large language models (LLMs), to automatically translate high-level natural language descriptions into detailed code outlines.

This could revolutionize the way programmers work. Instead of starting with the low-level details of code, they could simply describe what they want the program to do in plain English. The NLO system would then generate a well-structured outline of the code, complete with comments and explanations.

The authors argue that this "literate programming" approach has several benefits. It could make coding more accessible to non-experts, allow programmers to focus on the overall logic rather than syntax, and produce more readable and maintainable code. The paper describes the technical details of how the NLO system works, including its architecture and the training process.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a system called NLO (Natural Language Outlines) that uses large language models (LLMs) to translate high-level natural language descriptions into structured code outlines. The key components of the NLO system include:

  • Natural Language Encoder: This module uses a pre-trained LLM, such as GPT-3, to encode the natural language description into a high-dimensional vector representation.
  • Code Outline Generator: This module takes the encoded natural language input and generates a step-by-step code outline, including comments and explanations, using a custom training process.
  • Code Executor: This optional module can execute the generated code outline and provide feedback to the user on its functionality.

The authors evaluate the NLO system on a range of programming tasks and find that it can generate coherent and well-structured code outlines from natural language inputs. They also discuss potential applications of the NLO system, such as assisting novice programmers, enabling collaborative coding, and enhancing the code documentation process.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to leveraging LLMs for literate programming, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

  • The NLO system is currently limited to generating code outlines, and the authors note that translating these outlines into fully functional code remains a challenge.
  • The evaluation of the NLO system is primarily qualitative, and more rigorous quantitative metrics could help assess its performance and limitations.
  • The paper does not address potential biases or safety concerns that may arise from using LLMs to generate code, which is an important consideration for practical applications.
  • Further research is needed to explore ways to ensure the generated code outlines are secure, maintainable, and aligned with best practices in software engineering.

Despite these limitations, the authors have identified an exciting direction for the future of programming, where natural language can serve as a more accessible and expressive interface for code creation.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel approach to literate programming using large language models, which could significantly impact the way programmers work. By enabling the translation of natural language descriptions into structured code outlines, the NLO system has the potential to make coding more accessible, collaborative, and maintainable.

While the current implementation has limitations, the authors have outlined a promising path forward for further research and development in this area. As language models continue to advance, the integration of natural language and code generation could revolutionize the way we create and interact with software, democratizing programming and empowering a wider range of users to participate in the development process.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Natural Language Outlines for Code: Literate Programming in the LLM Era
Total Score

0

Natural Language Outlines for Code: Literate Programming in the LLM Era

Kensen Shi, Deniz Alt{i}nbuken, Saswat Anand, Mihai Christodorescu, Katja Grunwedel, Alexa Koenings, Sai Naidu, Anurag Pathak, Marc Rasi, Fredde Ribeiro, Brandon Ruffin, Siddhant Sanyam, Maxim Tabachnyk, Sara Toth, Roy Tu, Tobias Welp, Pengcheng Yin, Manzil Zaheer, Satish Chandra, Charles Sutton

We propose using natural language outlines as a novel modality and interaction surface for providing AI assistance to developers throughout the software development process. An NL outline for a code function comprises multiple statements written in concise prose, which partition the code and summarize its main ideas in the style of literate programming. Crucially, we find that modern LLMs can generate accurate and high-quality NL outlines in practice. Moreover, NL outlines enable a bidirectional sync between code and NL, allowing changes in one to be automatically reflected in the other. We discuss many use cases for NL outlines: they can accelerate understanding and navigation of code and diffs, simplify code maintenance, augment code search, steer code generation, and more. We then propose and compare multiple LLM prompting techniques for generating outlines and ask professional developers to judge outline quality. Finally, we present two case studies applying NL outlines toward code review and the difficult task of malware detection.

Read more

8/16/2024

Beyond Natural Language: LLMs Leveraging Alternative Formats for Enhanced Reasoning and Communication
Total Score

0

Beyond Natural Language: LLMs Leveraging Alternative Formats for Enhanced Reasoning and Communication

Weize Chen, Chenfei Yuan, Jiarui Yuan, Yusheng Su, Chen Qian, Cheng Yang, Ruobing Xie, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun

Natural language (NL) has long been the predominant format for human cognition and communication, and by extension, has been similarly pivotal in the development and application of Large Language Models (LLMs). Yet, besides NL, LLMs have seen various non-NL formats during pre-training, such as code and logical expression. NL's status as the optimal format for LLMs, particularly in single-LLM reasoning and multi-agent communication, has not been thoroughly examined. In this work, we challenge the default use of NL by exploring the utility of non-NL formats in these contexts. We show that allowing LLMs to autonomously select the most suitable format before reasoning or communicating leads to a 3.3 to 5.7% improvement in reasoning efficiency for different LLMs, and up to a 72.7% reduction in token usage in multi-agent communication, all while maintaining communicative effectiveness. Our comprehensive analysis further reveals that LLMs can devise a format from limited task instructions and that the devised format is effectively transferable across different LLMs. Intriguingly, the structured communication format decided by LLMs exhibits notable parallels with established agent communication languages, suggesting a natural evolution towards efficient, structured communication in agent communication. Our code is released at url{https://github.com/thunlp/AutoForm}.

Read more

6/21/2024

NoviCode: Generating Programs from Natural Language Utterances by Novices
Total Score

0

NoviCode: Generating Programs from Natural Language Utterances by Novices

Asaf Achi Mordechai, Yoav Goldberg, Reut Tsarfaty

Current Text-to-Code models demonstrate impressive capabilities in generating executable code from natural language snippets. However, current studies focus on technical instructions and programmer-oriented language, and it is an open question whether these models can effectively translate natural language descriptions given by non-technical users and express complex goals, to an executable program that contains an intricate flow - composed of API access and control structures as loops, conditions, and sequences. To unlock the challenge of generating a complete program from a plain non-technical description we present NoviCode, a novel NL Programming task, which takes as input an API and a natural language description by a novice non-programmer and provides an executable program as output. To assess the efficacy of models on this task, we provide a novel benchmark accompanied by test suites wherein the generated program code is assessed not according to their form, but according to their functional execution. Our experiments show that, first, NoviCode is indeed a challenging task in the code synthesis domain, and that generating complex code from non-technical instructions goes beyond the current Text-to-Code paradigm. Second, we show that a novel approach wherein we align the NL utterances with the compositional hierarchical structure of the code, greatly enhances the performance of LLMs on this task, compared with the end-to-end Text-to-Code counterparts.

Read more

7/17/2024

How Beginning Programmers and Code LLMs (Mis)read Each Other
Total Score

0

How Beginning Programmers and Code LLMs (Mis)read Each Other

Sydney Nguyen, Hannah McLean Babe, Yangtian Zi, Arjun Guha, Carolyn Jane Anderson, Molly Q Feldman

Generative AI models, specifically large language models (LLMs), have made strides towards the long-standing goal of text-to-code generation. This progress has invited numerous studies of user interaction. However, less is known about the struggles and strategies of non-experts, for whom each step of the text-to-code problem presents challenges: describing their intent in natural language, evaluating the correctness of generated code, and editing prompts when the generated code is incorrect. This paper presents a large-scale controlled study of how 120 beginning coders across three academic institutions approach writing and editing prompts. A novel experimental design allows us to target specific steps in the text-to-code process and reveals that beginners struggle with writing and editing prompts, even for problems at their skill level and when correctness is automatically determined. Our mixed-methods evaluation provides insight into student processes and perceptions with key implications for non-expert Code LLM use within and outside of education.

Read more

7/9/2024