NoviCode: Generating Programs from Natural Language Utterances by Novices
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces NoviCode, a system that aims to generate computer programs from natural language instructions provided by non-technical users.
- The key challenge addressed is how to enable people without programming expertise to create functional code through conversational interactions.
- The research explores techniques to translate natural language utterances into executable programs, addressing the gap between human language and formal programming constructs.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers behind NoviCode recognized a significant barrier for many people - the difficulty of translating ideas into working computer code, especially for those without formal programming training. IntelliExplain: Enhancing Interactive Code Generation through Natural language interactions. How Beginning Programmers Code LLMs Misread Each other's instructions. Natural Language Oriented Programming (NLOP): Towards Democratizing programming by bridging the gap between human and machine languages.
NoviCode aims to make this process more accessible by allowing users to simply describe what they want a program to do in natural language, and then having the system automatically generate the corresponding code. This could enable a wider range of people to create functional software without needing to learn complex programming languages and syntax. AIOSCCompiler: LLM as Interpreter for Natural Language to code translation.
The key innovation is finding ways for the system to reliably interpret open-ended natural language instructions and translate them into the structured format required for executable code. This involves techniques like Unicoder: Scaling Code as a Large Language Model that can handle the ambiguity and flexibility of human language.
Technical Explanation
The NoviCode system is designed to accept natural language inputs from users and automatically generate corresponding computer programs. The researchers leveraged large language models and other AI techniques to bridge the gap between human-centric language and the formal constructs required for executable code.
The core architecture involves several key components:
- A natural language understanding module that can parse and interpret open-ended user utterances
- A program generation module that can translate the interpreted language into executable code structures
- A execution and testing module to validate the generated programs
The researchers conducted extensive experiments to train and evaluate the NoviCode system, including testing it on a diverse set of programming tasks described in natural language. The results demonstrate significant improvements in the system's ability to accurately translate human instructions into working code, compared to prior approaches.
Critical Analysis
The NoviCode research represents an important step towards making programming more accessible to non-technical users. By allowing people to express their ideas in natural language, it lowers a major barrier to entry for creating functional software.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further work. The system is currently focused on a relatively constrained set of programming concepts, and may struggle with more open-ended or complex tasks. Additionally, the quality and reliability of the generated code is still an open challenge that requires more research.
There are also broader questions about the societal implications of such technologies. While democratizing programming has benefits, over-reliance on automated code generation could potentially reduce valuable programming skills and understanding among users. Careful consideration is needed to ensure these tools empower people without fully replacing human expertise.
Overall, the NoviCode work demonstrates promising progress, but there remains significant room for improvement and careful examination of the tradeoffs involved. Continued research in this direction could lead to transformative changes in how people interact with and create software.
Conclusion
The NoviCode system represents an innovative approach to bridging the gap between natural language and computer programming. By enabling non-technical users to generate functional code simply by describing their intent, it has the potential to dramatically expand access to software development.
The core technical advances around natural language understanding and program generation are an important step forward. However, significant challenges remain in ensuring the reliability, flexibility, and transparency of these automated code creation tools.
As this research area continues to evolve, it will be crucial to carefully consider the broader societal impacts - both the benefits of democratizing programming, as well as the risks of over-automating core technical skills. With thoughtful development and deployment, systems like NoviCode could revolutionize how people interact with and create technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
NoviCode: Generating Programs from Natural Language Utterances by Novices
Asaf Achi Mordechai, Yoav Goldberg, Reut Tsarfaty
Current Text-to-Code models demonstrate impressive capabilities in generating executable code from natural language snippets. However, current studies focus on technical instructions and programmer-oriented language, and it is an open question whether these models can effectively translate natural language descriptions given by non-technical users and express complex goals, to an executable program that contains an intricate flow - composed of API access and control structures as loops, conditions, and sequences. To unlock the challenge of generating a complete program from a plain non-technical description we present NoviCode, a novel NL Programming task, which takes as input an API and a natural language description by a novice non-programmer and provides an executable program as output. To assess the efficacy of models on this task, we provide a novel benchmark accompanied by test suites wherein the generated program code is assessed not according to their form, but according to their functional execution. Our experiments show that, first, NoviCode is indeed a challenging task in the code synthesis domain, and that generating complex code from non-technical instructions goes beyond the current Text-to-Code paradigm. Second, we show that a novel approach wherein we align the NL utterances with the compositional hierarchical structure of the code, greatly enhances the performance of LLMs on this task, compared with the end-to-end Text-to-Code counterparts.
Read more7/17/2024
0
IntelliExplain: Enhancing Interactive Code Generation through Natural Language Explanations for Non-Professional Programmers
Hao Yan, Thomas D. Latoza, Ziyu Yao
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited a strong promise in automatically generating executable code from natural language descriptions, particularly with interactive features that allow users to engage in the code-generation process by instructing the LLM with iterative feedback. However, existing interaction paradigms often assume that users have expert knowledge to debug source code and are not optimized for non-professional programmers' use. This raises challenges in making interactive code generation more accessible for individuals with varying levels of programming expertise. To tackle these challenges, we present IntelliExplain, which offers a novel human-LLM interaction paradigm to enhance non-professional programmers' experience by enabling them to interact with source code via natural language explanations. Users interact with IntelliExplain by providing natural language corrective feedback on errors they identify from the explanations. Feedback is used by the system to revise the code, until the user is satisfied with explanations by the system of the code. Our user study demonstrates that users with IntelliExplain achieve a significantly higher success rate 11.6% and 25.3% better than with vanilla GPT-3.5, while also requiring 39.0% and 15.6% less time in Text-to-SQL and Python code generation tasks, respectively.
Read more5/17/2024
0
Natural Language Outlines for Code: Literate Programming in the LLM Era
Kensen Shi, Deniz Alt{i}nbuken, Saswat Anand, Mihai Christodorescu, Katja Grunwedel, Alexa Koenings, Sai Naidu, Anurag Pathak, Marc Rasi, Fredde Ribeiro, Brandon Ruffin, Siddhant Sanyam, Maxim Tabachnyk, Sara Toth, Roy Tu, Tobias Welp, Pengcheng Yin, Manzil Zaheer, Satish Chandra, Charles Sutton
We propose using natural language outlines as a novel modality and interaction surface for providing AI assistance to developers throughout the software development process. An NL outline for a code function comprises multiple statements written in concise prose, which partition the code and summarize its main ideas in the style of literate programming. Crucially, we find that modern LLMs can generate accurate and high-quality NL outlines in practice. Moreover, NL outlines enable a bidirectional sync between code and NL, allowing changes in one to be automatically reflected in the other. We discuss many use cases for NL outlines: they can accelerate understanding and navigation of code and diffs, simplify code maintenance, augment code search, steer code generation, and more. We then propose and compare multiple LLM prompting techniques for generating outlines and ask professional developers to judge outline quality. Finally, we present two case studies applying NL outlines toward code review and the difficult task of malware detection.
Read more8/16/2024
0
How Beginning Programmers and Code LLMs (Mis)read Each Other
Sydney Nguyen, Hannah McLean Babe, Yangtian Zi, Arjun Guha, Carolyn Jane Anderson, Molly Q Feldman
Generative AI models, specifically large language models (LLMs), have made strides towards the long-standing goal of text-to-code generation. This progress has invited numerous studies of user interaction. However, less is known about the struggles and strategies of non-experts, for whom each step of the text-to-code problem presents challenges: describing their intent in natural language, evaluating the correctness of generated code, and editing prompts when the generated code is incorrect. This paper presents a large-scale controlled study of how 120 beginning coders across three academic institutions approach writing and editing prompts. A novel experimental design allows us to target specific steps in the text-to-code process and reveals that beginners struggle with writing and editing prompts, even for problems at their skill level and when correctness is automatically determined. Our mixed-methods evaluation provides insight into student processes and perceptions with key implications for non-expert Code LLM use within and outside of education.
Read more7/9/2024