Natural Language Processing RELIES on Linguistics

Read original: arXiv:2405.05966 - Published 9/10/2024 by Juri Opitz, Shira Wein, Nathan Schneider
Total Score

0

🌿

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Large language models (LLMs) can now generate highly fluent text without specialized grammar or semantic modules
  • This raises questions about the role of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) going forward
  • The paper highlights six key areas where linguistics still contributes to and can inform new directions in NLP

Plain English Explanation

Large language models like those used in services like GPT-3 have become remarkably good at generating coherent and natural-sounding text, even without modules specifically designed to capture grammar or meaning. This raises interesting questions about the continued importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) research and applications.

The paper argues that linguistics still plays a crucial role in several key aspects of NLP. These include:

  1. Providing linguistic resources like datasets and benchmarks for evaluating models
  2. Informing evaluation methods that go beyond just measuring fluency
  3. Enabling NLP systems to work in low-resource languages where linguistic data may be scarce
  4. Improving the interpretability of NLP models and their outputs
  5. Providing explanations for how these models understand and generate language
  6. Advancing the fundamental study of language itself

While not the only consideration, these areas highlight how linguistic expertise remains essential for developing robust and meaningful NLP systems, even as the capabilities of language models continue to grow.

Technical Explanation

The paper argues that despite the remarkable progress of large language models (LLMs) in generating fluent text, linguistics still plays a crucial role in several key aspects of natural language processing (NLP).

The authors use the acronym "RELIES" to encapsulate six major facets where linguistics contributes to NLP:

  1. Resources: Linguistics provides crucial datasets, benchmarks, and other resources for training and evaluating NLP models.
  2. Evaluation: Linguistic insights are needed to develop evaluation methods that go beyond just measuring fluency, and can assess semantic coherence, pragmatic nuance, and other higher-level language understanding.
  3. Low-resource settings: Linguistic knowledge is essential for enabling NLP systems to work effectively in languages and contexts where labeled data is scarce.
  4. Interpretability: Linguistics can help improve the interpretability of LLMs, allowing users to understand how these models understand and generate language.
  5. Explanation: Linguistic analysis is needed to provide meaningful explanations for the behavior of complex NLP systems.
  6. Study of language: Advancing the fundamental scientific study of human language remains crucial for driving progress in NLP.

While these areas do not represent the only considerations, the authors argue that they highlight the enduring importance of linguistic expertise for developing robust and meaningful NLP applications, even as language models continue to become more sophisticated.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the continued relevance of linguistics in the era of powerful large language models. It rightly points out that while LLMs have made remarkable strides in generating fluent text, there are still many aspects of natural language processing where linguistic knowledge and principles remain essential.

One potential limitation is that the paper does not delve deeply into the specific ways in which linguistics can inform each of the "RELIES" facets. A more detailed exploration of the technical applications and research directions in these areas could have strengthened the analysis.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential ways in which the capabilities of LLMs themselves could eventually obviate the need for certain linguistic resources or evaluations. As these models become more sophisticated, some of the current linguistic bottlenecks in NLP may be gradually overcome.

Nevertheless, the core argument of the paper remains valid - linguistics is not going away as a crucial component of NLP research and development. Striking the right balance between linguistic expertise and the advancing capabilities of large language models will be an important challenge for the field going forward.

Conclusion

This paper makes a compelling case for the enduring importance of linguistics in natural language processing, even as large language models demonstrate impressive fluency in text generation without specialized linguistic modules.

The six key facets outlined - resources, evaluation, low-resource settings, interpretability, explanation, and the study of language itself - highlight how linguistic expertise continues to play a vital role in developing robust and meaningful NLP systems. While not the only consideration, these areas underscore the need for NLP researchers and practitioners to closely engage with linguistic principles and analysis.

As large language models continue to advance, finding the right synergy between these powerful AI systems and linguistic knowledge will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of natural language processing across a wide range of applications and domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌿

Total Score

0

Natural Language Processing RELIES on Linguistics

Juri Opitz, Shira Wein, Nathan Schneider

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become capable of generating highly fluent text in certain languages, without modules specially designed to capture grammar or semantic coherence. What does this mean for the future of linguistic expertise in NLP? We highlight several aspects in which NLP (still) relies on linguistics, or where linguistic thinking can illuminate new directions. We argue our case around the acronym RELIES that encapsulates six major facets where linguistics contributes to NLP: Resources, Evaluation, Low-resource settings, Interpretability, Explanation, and the Study of language. This list is not exhaustive, nor is linguistics the main point of reference for every effort under these themes; but at a macro level, these facets highlight the enduring importance of studying machine systems vis-`a-vis systems of human language.

Read more

9/10/2024

Language Models as Models of Language
Total Score

0

Language Models as Models of Language

Raphael Milli`ere

This chapter critically examines the potential contributions of modern language models to theoretical linguistics. Despite their focus on engineering goals, these models' ability to acquire sophisticated linguistic knowledge from mere exposure to data warrants a careful reassessment of their relevance to linguistic theory. I review a growing body of empirical evidence suggesting that language models can learn hierarchical syntactic structure and exhibit sensitivity to various linguistic phenomena, even when trained on developmentally plausible amounts of data. While the competence/performance distinction has been invoked to dismiss the relevance of such models to linguistic theory, I argue that this assessment may be premature. By carefully controlling learning conditions and making use of causal intervention methods, experiments with language models can potentially constrain hypotheses about language acquisition and competence. I conclude that closer collaboration between theoretical linguists and computational researchers could yield valuable insights, particularly in advancing debates about linguistic nativism.

Read more

8/15/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

We are Who We Cite: Bridges of Influence Between Natural Language Processing and Other Academic Fields

Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas, Mohamed Abdalla, Bela Gipp, Saif M. Mohammad

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is poised to substantially influence the world. However, significant progress comes hand-in-hand with substantial risks. Addressing them requires broad engagement with various fields of study. Yet, little empirical work examines the state of such engagement (past or current). In this paper, we quantify the degree of influence between 23 fields of study and NLP (on each other). We analyzed ~77k NLP papers, ~3.1m citations from NLP papers to other papers, and ~1.8m citations from other papers to NLP papers. We show that, unlike most fields, the cross-field engagement of NLP, measured by our proposed Citation Field Diversity Index (CFDI), has declined from 0.58 in 1980 to 0.31 in 2022 (an all-time low). In addition, we find that NLP has grown more insular -- citing increasingly more NLP papers and having fewer papers that act as bridges between fields. NLP citations are dominated by computer science; Less than 8% of NLP citations are to linguistics, and less than 3% are to math and psychology. These findings underscore NLP's urgent need to reflect on its engagement with various fields.

Read more

7/17/2024

Leveraging Large Language Models through Natural Language Processing to provide interpretable Machine Learning predictions of mental deterioration in real time
Total Score

0

Leveraging Large Language Models through Natural Language Processing to provide interpretable Machine Learning predictions of mental deterioration in real time

Francisco de Arriba-P'erez, Silvia Garc'ia-M'endez

Based on official estimates, 50 million people worldwide are affected by dementia, and this number increases by 10 million new patients every year. Without a cure, clinical prognostication and early intervention represent the most effective ways to delay its progression. To this end, Artificial Intelligence and computational linguistics can be exploited for natural language analysis, personalized assessment, monitoring, and treatment. However, traditional approaches need more semantic knowledge management and explicability capabilities. Moreover, using Large Language Models (LLMs) for cognitive decline diagnosis is still scarce, even though these models represent the most advanced way for clinical-patient communication using intelligent systems. Consequently, we leverage an LLM using the latest Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques in a chatbot solution to provide interpretable Machine Learning prediction of cognitive decline in real-time. Linguistic-conceptual features are exploited for appropriate natural language analysis. Through explainability, we aim to fight potential biases of the models and improve their potential to help clinical workers in their diagnosis decisions. More in detail, the proposed pipeline is composed of (i) data extraction employing NLP-based prompt engineering; (ii) stream-based data processing including feature engineering, analysis, and selection; (iii) real-time classification; and (iv) the explainability dashboard to provide visual and natural language descriptions of the prediction outcome. Classification results exceed 80 % in all evaluation metrics, with a recall value for the mental deterioration class about 85 %. To sum up, we contribute with an affordable, flexible, non-invasive, personalized diagnostic system to this work.

Read more

9/6/2024