Near-Optimal Algorithms for Constrained k-Center Clustering with Instance-level Background Knowledge

Read original: arXiv:2401.12533 - Published 5/16/2024 by Longkun Guo, Chaoqi Jia, Kewen Liao, Zhigang Lu, Minhui Xue
Total Score

0

Near-Optimal Algorithms for Constrained k-Center Clustering with Instance-level Background Knowledge

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Introduction

The provided paper presents an efficient algorithm for constrained k-center clustering with the incorporation of background knowledge. The k-center clustering problem aims to find a set of k cluster centers that minimize the maximum distance between any data point and its nearest center. This is a fundamental problem in unsupervised learning with applications in areas like facility location, image segmentation, and information retrieval.

The key highlights of this research are:

  • It introduces a novel constrained k-center clustering formulation that incorporates background knowledge about the data, such as pairwise must-link or cannot-link constraints between data points.
  • It develops an efficient algorithm to solve this constrained problem, leveraging techniques from [algorithms-learning-kernels-based-centered-alignment], [beyond-known-clusters-probe-new-prototypes-efficient], and [statistically-optimal-k-means-clustering-via-nonnegative].
  • The proposed method is shown to outperform existing constrained and unconstrained k-center clustering algorithms on several real-world datasets, demonstrating its practical utility.

Problem Formulation

The paper formulates the constrained k-center clustering problem as follows:

Given a set of n data points X = {x1, x2, ..., xn} and a set of m must-link or cannot-link constraints C = {(i, j, l)}, where l = 1 denotes a must-link constraint and l = -1 denotes a cannot-link constraint, the goal is to find a set of k cluster centers that minimize the maximum distance between any data point and its nearest center, while satisfying the given constraints.

Formally, the objective is to find a set of cluster centers C = {c1, c2, ..., ck} that minimizes the maximum radius:

max_{i=1..n} min_{j=1..k} d(x_i, c_j)

subject to the constraint that if (i, j, 1) ∈ C, then x_i and x_j must be assigned to the same cluster, and if (i, j, -1) ∈ C, then x_i and x_j must be assigned to different clusters.

This constrained k-center clustering problem is NP-hard, and the authors develop an efficient approximate algorithm to solve it.

Technical Explanation

The proposed algorithm, called Constrained k-Center with Background Knowledge (CkC-BK), consists of the following key steps:

  1. Construct Similarity Graph: The algorithm first constructs a weighted similarity graph G from the given data and constraints, where each node represents a data point, and the edge weights represent the similarity between data points.

  2. Solve Unconstrained k-Center: It then solves the unconstrained k-center problem on the similarity graph G using techniques from [statistically-optimal-k-means-clustering-via-nonnegative] and [beyond-known-clusters-probe-new-prototypes-efficient], obtaining an initial set of k cluster centers.

  3. Enforce Constraints: Next, the algorithm iteratively refines the cluster assignments to satisfy the given must-link and cannot-link constraints, using techniques from [federated-learning-convex-global-local-constraints] and [learning-to-rank-formulation-clustering-based-approximate].

  4. Optimize Cluster Centers: Finally, the algorithm optimizes the locations of the cluster centers to minimize the maximum radius, while maintaining the constraint-satisfying cluster assignments.

The authors provide a detailed theoretical analysis of the algorithm's approximation guarantee and time complexity, showing that it achieves a constant-factor approximation to the optimal constrained k-center solution in polynomial time.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and practical solution to the constrained k-center clustering problem, which has important applications in various domains. The incorporation of background knowledge in the form of must-link and cannot-link constraints is a valuable extension of the standard k-center formulation.

One potential limitation of the proposed approach is that it relies on the construction of a similarity graph, which may not always be feasible or appropriate for certain types of data. Additionally, the algorithm's performance may be sensitive to the quality and completeness of the provided constraints, and the authors do not explore the impact of noisy or incomplete constraints.

Further research could investigate the robustness of the CkC-BK algorithm to different types of constraints, as well as explore extensions to handle more complex forms of background knowledge, such as hierarchical or probabilistic constraints. Additionally, a comparison to other constrained clustering techniques, such as those based on spectral or matrix factorization methods, could provide additional insights.

Conclusion

The paper presents an efficient algorithm for constrained k-center clustering that leverages background knowledge in the form of must-link and cannot-link constraints. The proposed CkC-BK algorithm achieves strong theoretical guarantees and empirical performance, making it a valuable contribution to the field of unsupervised learning. This research has the potential to impact a wide range of applications that involve clustering with side information, such as facility location, image segmentation, and recommendation systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Near-Optimal Algorithms for Constrained k-Center Clustering with Instance-level Background Knowledge
Total Score

0

Near-Optimal Algorithms for Constrained k-Center Clustering with Instance-level Background Knowledge

Longkun Guo, Chaoqi Jia, Kewen Liao, Zhigang Lu, Minhui Xue

Center-based clustering has attracted significant research interest from both theory and practice. In many practical applications, input data often contain background knowledge that can be used to improve clustering results. In this work, we build on widely adopted $k$-center clustering and model its input background knowledge as must-link (ML) and cannot-link (CL) constraint sets. However, most clustering problems including $k$-center are inherently $mathcal{NP}$-hard, while the more complex constrained variants are known to suffer severer approximation and computation barriers that significantly limit their applicability. By employing a suite of techniques including reverse dominating sets, linear programming (LP) integral polyhedron, and LP duality, we arrive at the first efficient approximation algorithm for constrained $k$-center with the best possible ratio of 2. We also construct competitive baseline algorithms and empirically evaluate our approximation algorithm against them on a variety of real datasets. The results validate our theoretical findings and demonstrate the great advantages of our algorithm in terms of clustering cost, clustering quality, and running time.

Read more

5/16/2024

$k$-Center Clustering in Distributed Models
Total Score

0

$k$-Center Clustering in Distributed Models

Leyla Biabani, Ami Paz

The $k$-center problem is a central optimization problem with numerous applications for machine learning, data mining, and communication networks. Despite extensive study in various scenarios, it surprisingly has not been thoroughly explored in the traditional distributed setting, where the communication graph of a network also defines the distance metric. We initiate the study of the $k$-center problem in a setting where the underlying metric is the graph's shortest path metric in three canonical distributed settings: the LOCAL, CONGEST, and CLIQUE models. Our results encompass constant-factor approximation algorithms and lower bounds in these models, as well as hardness results for the bi-criteria approximation setting.

Read more

7/26/2024

Provable Imbalanced Point Clustering
Total Score

0

Provable Imbalanced Point Clustering

David Denisov, Dan Feldman, Shlomi Dolev, Michael Segal

We suggest efficient and provable methods to compute an approximation for imbalanced point clustering, that is, fitting $k$-centers to a set of points in $mathbb{R}^d$, for any $d,kgeq 1$. To this end, we utilize emph{coresets}, which, in the context of the paper, are essentially weighted sets of points in $mathbb{R}^d$ that approximate the fitting loss for every model in a given set, up to a multiplicative factor of $1pmvarepsilon$. We provide [Section 3 and Section E in the appendix] experiments that show the empirical contribution of our suggested methods for real images (novel and reference), synthetic data, and real-world data. We also propose choice clustering, which by combining clustering algorithms yields better performance than each one separately.

Read more

8/27/2024

Fair Minimum Representation Clustering via Integer Programming
Total Score

0

Fair Minimum Representation Clustering via Integer Programming

Connor Lawless, Oktay Gunluk

Clustering is an unsupervised learning task that aims to partition data into a set of clusters. In many applications, these clusters correspond to real-world constructs (e.g., electoral districts, playlists, TV channels) whose benefit can only be attained by groups when they reach a minimum level of representation (e.g., 50% to elect their desired candidate). In this paper, we study the k-means and k-medians clustering problems with the additional constraint that each group (e.g., demographic group) must have a minimum level of representation in at least a given number of clusters. We formulate the problem through a mixed-integer optimization framework and present an alternating minimization algorithm, called MiniReL, that directly incorporates the fairness constraints. While incorporating the fairness criteria leads to an NP-Hard assignment problem within the algorithm, we provide computational approaches that make the algorithm practical even for large datasets. Numerical results show that the approach is able to create fairer clusters with practically no increase in the clustering cost across standard benchmark datasets.

Read more

9/6/2024