Near-Optimal Algorithms for Differentially Private Online Learning in a Stochastic Environment

Read original: arXiv:2102.07929 - Published 5/31/2024 by Bingshan Hu, Zhiming Huang, Nishant A. Mehta, Nidhi Hegde

✨

Overview

This paper explores differentially private online learning problems in a stochastic environment, considering both bandit and full information feedback scenarios.
For differentially private stochastic bandits, the authors propose UCB and Thompson Sampling-based algorithms that achieve optimal instance-dependent regret bounds.
For the differentially private full information setting, the paper establishes instance-dependent and minimax regret lower bounds, and presents an algorithm that matches these bounds up to a logarithmic factor.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a machine learning technique called "online learning" in a stochastic (random) environment. In this setup, a learning algorithm repeatedly makes decisions and receives feedback, with the goal of minimizing its "regret" - the difference between its cumulative performance and that of the best possible decision-making strategy.

The authors consider two types of feedback: "bandit" feedback, where the algorithm only learns about the outcome of the decision it made, and "full information" feedback, where it learns about the outcomes of all possible decisions.

Importantly, the authors also want the learning algorithms to be "differentially private," meaning they protect the privacy of the data used to train the algorithms. This is a crucial concern in many real-world applications.

For the bandit feedback case, the authors develop algorithms that are both "anytime" (can be run indefinitely) and optimal in terms of their regret bounds. For the full information case, the authors establish fundamental limits on the best achievable regret, and present an algorithm that nearly matches these limits.

Overall, this work advances the state-of-the-art in differentially private online learning, with potential applications in areas like personalized recommendation systems, resource allocation in multi-agent systems, and adaptive decision-making in changing environments.

Technical Explanation

The paper considers two main settings: differentially private stochastic bandits and differentially private full information learning.

For the stochastic bandit setting, the authors propose two algorithms: a UCB (Upper Confidence Bound)-based algorithm and a Thompson Sampling-based algorithm. These algorithms are anytime and achieve the optimal instance-dependent regret bound, which scales with the logarithm of the time horizon and inversely with the minimum suboptimality gap and the privacy parameter.

In the differentially private full information setting, the authors first establish an instance-dependent regret lower bound that scales with the logarithm of the number of actions and inversely with the minimum suboptimality gap and the privacy parameter. They also derive a minimax lower bound that scales with the square root of the time horizon and the logarithm of the number of actions, divided by the privacy parameter.

The authors then present an ε-differentially private algorithm for the full information setting, whose instance-dependent and worst-case regret match the corresponding lower bounds up to an extra logarithmic factor in the time horizon.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes several important contributions to the field of differentially private online learning. The proposed algorithms for stochastic bandits are shown to be optimal in terms of their regret bounds, which is a strong theoretical result.

One potential limitation of the work is that the analysis is focused on the stochastic setting, whereas many real-world problems involve non-stochastic or adversarial environments. It would be interesting to see if similar techniques could be extended to non-stochastic bandit problems or distributed learning settings.

Additionally, the paper does not provide extensive experimental validation of the proposed algorithms. While the theoretical analysis is rigorous, it would be helpful to see how the algorithms perform in practice, especially in comparison to existing differentially private online learning methods.

Overall, this work represents a significant advancement in the understanding of differentially private online learning, and the insights and techniques developed here could have broader applications in the field of differentially private machine learning.

Conclusion

This paper makes important contributions to the study of differentially private online learning in stochastic environments. The authors develop optimal algorithms for the bandit feedback setting and establish fundamental limits for the full information setting, while also presenting an algorithm that nearly matches these limits.

These results advance the state-of-the-art in differentially private online learning and have the potential to impact a wide range of applications, from personalized recommendation systems to adaptive decision-making in dynamic environments. The techniques and insights developed in this work could also inspire further research into differentially private machine learning in other contexts.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

✨

Near-Optimal Algorithms for Differentially Private Online Learning in a Stochastic Environment

Bingshan Hu, Zhiming Huang, Nishant A. Mehta, Nidhi Hegde

In this paper, we study differentially private online learning problems in a stochastic environment under both bandit and full information feedback. For differentially private stochastic bandits, we propose both UCB and Thompson Sampling-based algorithms that are anytime and achieve the optimal $O left(sum_{j: Delta_j>0} frac{ln(T)}{min left{Delta_j, epsilon right}} right)$ instance-dependent regret bound, where $T$ is the finite learning horizon, $Delta_j$ denotes the suboptimality gap between the optimal arm and a suboptimal arm $j$, and $epsilon$ is the required privacy parameter. For the differentially private full information setting with stochastic rewards, we show an $Omega left(frac{ln(K)}{min left{Delta_{min}, epsilon right}} right)$ instance-dependent regret lower bound and an $Omegaleft(sqrt{Tln(K)} + frac{ln(K)}{epsilon}right)$ minimax lower bound, where $K$ is the total number of actions and $Delta_{min}$ denotes the minimum suboptimality gap among all the suboptimal actions. For the same differentially private full information setting, we also present an $epsilon$-differentially private algorithm whose instance-dependent regret and worst-case regret match our respective lower bounds up to an extra $log(T)$ factor.

5/31/2024

🏅

Locally Differentially Private Distributed Online Learning with Guaranteed Optimality

Ziqin Chen, Yongqiang Wang

Distributed online learning is gaining increased traction due to its unique ability to process large-scale datasets and streaming data. To address the growing public awareness and concern on privacy protection, plenty of algorithms have been proposed to enable differential privacy in distributed online optimization and learning. However, these algorithms often face the dilemma of trading learning accuracy for privacy. By exploiting the unique characteristics of online learning, this paper proposes an approach that tackles the dilemma and ensures both differential privacy and learning accuracy in distributed online learning. More specifically, while ensuring a diminishing expected instantaneous regret, the approach can simultaneously ensure a finite cumulative privacy budget, even in the infinite time horizon. To cater for the fully distributed setting, we adopt the local differential-privacy framework, which avoids the reliance on a trusted data curator that is required in the classic centralized (global) differential-privacy framework. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm that successfully ensures both rigorous local differential privacy and learning accuracy. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is evaluated using machine learning tasks, including logistic regression on the the mushrooms datasets and CNN-based image classification on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets.

8/27/2024

🐍

Concentrated Differential Privacy for Bandits

Achraf Azize, Debabrota Basu

Bandits serve as the theoretical foundation of sequential learning and an algorithmic foundation of modern recommender systems. However, recommender systems often rely on user-sensitive data, making privacy a critical concern. This paper contributes to the understanding of Differential Privacy (DP) in bandits with a trusted centralised decision-maker, and especially the implications of ensuring zero Concentrated Differential Privacy (zCDP). First, we formalise and compare different adaptations of DP to bandits, depending on the considered input and the interaction protocol. Then, we propose three private algorithms, namely AdaC-UCB, AdaC-GOPE and AdaC-OFUL, for three bandit settings, namely finite-armed bandits, linear bandits, and linear contextual bandits. The three algorithms share a generic algorithmic blueprint, i.e. the Gaussian mechanism and adaptive episodes, to ensure a good privacy-utility trade-off. We analyse and upper bound the regret of these three algorithms. Our analysis shows that in all of these settings, the prices of imposing zCDP are (asymptotically) negligible in comparison with the regrets incurred oblivious to privacy. Next, we complement our regret upper bounds with the first minimax lower bounds on the regret of bandits with zCDP. To prove the lower bounds, we elaborate a new proof technique based on couplings and optimal transport. We conclude by experimentally validating our theoretical results for the three different settings of bandits.

4/16/2024

On the Growth of Mistakes in Differentially Private Online Learning: A Lower Bound Perspective

Daniil Dmitriev, Krist'of Szab'o, Amartya Sanyal

In this paper, we provide lower bounds for Differentially Private (DP) Online Learning algorithms. Our result shows that, for a broad class of $(varepsilon,delta)$-DP online algorithms, for number of rounds $T$ such that $log Tleq O(1 / delta)$, the expected number of mistakes incurred by the algorithm grows as $Omega(log frac{T}{delta})$. This matches the upper bound obtained by Golowich and Livni (2021) and is in contrast to non-private online learning where the number of mistakes is independent of $T$. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first result towards settling lower bounds for DP-Online learning and partially addresses the open question in Sanyal and Ramponi (2022).

8/7/2024