Neural Dynamics Model of Visual Decision-Making: Learning from Human Experts
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a neural dynamics model for visual decision-making that learns from human expert performance
- Combines neural network architecture with biologically-inspired dynamics to capture the temporal dynamics of decision-making
- Demonstrates the model's ability to learn decision-making strategies from human experts and outperform humans on a visual task
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new computational model for how the brain makes visual decisions. This model combines a neural network architecture, which is inspired by the structure of the brain, with dynamic mathematical equations that capture how the brain's neurons change over time during the decision-making process.
The key innovation is that the model is able to learn from the decision-making strategies of human experts. By observing how skilled human decision-makers approach a visual task, the model can adapt its own decision-making strategy to match and even outperform the humans.
This allows the model to capture the temporal dynamics of human decision-making in a way that previous models could not. The model provides insights into the cognitive processes underlying visual decision-making, and could potentially be used to develop AI systems that can make decisions more like humans in dynamic, real-world environments.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel neural dynamics model for visual decision-making that learns from human expert performance. The model combines a deep neural network architecture with a recurrent neural network that captures the temporal dynamics of the decision-making process.
The neural network component is used to process the visual input and extract relevant features. The recurrent component then integrates these features over time, using biologically-inspired equations that govern how the network's internal state evolves. This allows the model to capture the temporal unfolding of the decision-making process, rather than just making a static judgment based on the input.
Crucially, the model is trained not only on example visual stimuli and decisions, but also on recordings of human experts making decisions on the same task. This allows the model to learn the decision-making strategies of the human experts and incorporate them into its own decision-making process.
The authors demonstrate that this hybrid neural dynamics model can outperform human experts on a challenging visual decision-making task. This suggests that the model is able to effectively capture and leverage the cognitive strategies employed by skilled human decision-makers.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough evaluation of their neural dynamics model, including comparisons to both human performance and alternative computational approaches. However, the paper does not address certain limitations or potential concerns with the research.
For example, the model was trained and tested on a relatively simple visual task, and it remains to be seen whether the approach would scale effectively to more complex, real-world decision-making scenarios. Additionally, the authors do not discuss the potential biases or limitations of the human expert data used to train the model, which could impact the model's decision-making strategies.
Further research is also needed to fully understand the cognitive mechanisms underlying the model's decision-making process and how they relate to the human brain. While the authors draw connections to biological plausibility, more work is required to validate these claims and explore the model's neurological underpinnings.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel neural dynamics model that learns from human expert performance to make visual decisions. By combining deep neural networks with biologically-inspired temporal dynamics, the model is able to capture the cognitive strategies employed by skilled human decision-makers.
The authors demonstrate that this approach can outperform human experts on a challenging visual task, suggesting that the model has the potential to provide valuable insights into the neural mechanisms of human decision-making. While the research has some limitations, it represents an important step towards developing AI systems that can make decisions more like humans in dynamic, real-world environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Neural Dynamics Model of Visual Decision-Making: Learning from Human Experts
Jie Su, Fang Cai, Shu-Kuo Zhao, Xin-Yi Wang, Tian-Yi Qian, Da-Hui Wang, Bo Hong
Uncovering the fundamental neural correlates of biological intelligence, developing mathematical models, and conducting computational simulations are critical for advancing new paradigms in artificial intelligence (AI). In this study, we implemented a comprehensive visual decision-making model that spans from visual input to behavioral output, using a neural dynamics modeling approach. Drawing inspiration from the key components of the dorsal visual pathway in primates, our model not only aligns closely with human behavior but also reflects neural activities in primates, and achieving accuracy comparable to convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified key neuroimaging features such as structural connections and functional connectivity that are associated with performance in perceptual decision-making tasks. A neuroimaging-informed fine-tuning approach was introduced and applied to the model, leading to performance improvements that paralleled the behavioral variations observed among subjects. Compared to classical deep learning models, our model more accurately replicates the behavioral performance of biological intelligence, relying on the structural characteristics of biological neural networks rather than extensive training data, and demonstrating enhanced resilience to perturbation.
Read more9/5/2024
🧠
0
Towards Neural Network based Cognitive Models of Dynamic Decision-Making by Humans
Changyu Chen, Shashank Reddy Chirra, Maria Jos'e Ferreira, Cleotilde Gonzalez, Arunesh Sinha, Pradeep Varakantham
Modeling human cognitive processes in dynamic decision-making tasks has been an endeavor in AI for a long time because such models can help make AI systems more intuitive, personalized, mitigate any human biases, and enhance training in simulation. Some initial work has attempted to utilize neural networks (and large language models) but often assumes one common model for all humans and aims to emulate human behavior in aggregate. However, the behavior of each human is distinct, heterogeneous, and relies on specific past experiences in certain tasks. For instance, consider two individuals responding to a phishing email: one who has previously encountered and identified similar threats may recognize it quickly, while another without such experience might fall for the scam. In this work, we build on Instance Based Learning (IBL) that posits that human decisions are based on similar situations encountered in the past. However, IBL relies on simple fixed form functions to capture the mapping from past situations to current decisions. To that end, we propose two new attention-based neural network models to have open form non-linear functions to model distinct and heterogeneous human decision-making in dynamic settings. We experiment with two distinct datasets gathered from human subject experiment data, one focusing on detection of phishing email by humans and another where humans act as attackers in a cybersecurity setting and decide on an attack option. We conducted extensive experiments with our two neural network models, IBL, and GPT3.5, and demonstrate that the neural network models outperform IBL significantly in representing human decision-making, while providing similar interpretability of human decisions as IBL. Overall, our work yields promising results for further use of neural networks in cognitive modeling of human decision making.
Read more9/6/2024
👨🏫
0
Comparing supervised learning dynamics: Deep neural networks match human data efficiency but show a generalisation lag
Lukas S. Huber, Fred W. Mast, Felix A. Wichmann
Recent research has seen many behavioral comparisons between humans and deep neural networks (DNNs) in the domain of image classification. Often, comparison studies focus on the end-result of the learning process by measuring and comparing the similarities in the representations of object categories once they have been formed. However, the process of how these representations emerge -- that is, the behavioral changes and intermediate stages observed during the acquisition -- is less often directly and empirically compared. Here we report a detailed investigation of the learning dynamics in human observers and various classic and state-of-the-art DNNs. We develop a constrained supervised learning environment to align learning-relevant conditions such as starting point, input modality, available input data and the feedback provided. Across the whole learning process we evaluate and compare how well learned representations can be generalized to previously unseen test data. Comparisons across the entire learning process indicate that DNNs demonstrate a level of data efficiency comparable to human learners, challenging some prevailing assumptions in the field. However, our results also reveal representational differences: while DNNs' learning is characterized by a pronounced generalisation lag, humans appear to immediately acquire generalizable representations without a preliminary phase of learning training set-specific information that is only later transferred to novel data.
Read more7/15/2024
📈
0
Biologically-Motivated Learning Model for Instructed Visual Processing
Roy Abel, Shimon Ullman
As part of understanding how the brain learns, ongoing work seeks to combine biological knowledge and current artificial intelligence (AI) modeling in an attempt to find an efficient biologically plausible learning scheme. Current models of biologically plausible learning often use a cortical-like combination of bottom-up (BU) and top-down (TD) processing, where the TD part carries feedback signals used for learning. However, in the visual cortex, the TD pathway plays a second major role of visual attention, by guiding the visual process to locations and tasks of interest. A biological model should therefore combine the two tasks, and learn to guide the visual process. We introduce a model that uses a cortical-like combination of BU and TD processing that naturally integrates the two major functions of the TD stream. The integrated model is obtained by an appropriate connectivity pattern between the BU and TD streams, a novel processing cycle that uses the TD part twice, and the use of 'Counter-Hebb' learning that operates across the streams. We show that the 'Counter-Hebb' mechanism can provide an exact backpropagation synaptic modification. We further demonstrate the model's ability to guide the visual stream to perform a task of interest, achieving competitive performance compared with AI models on standard multi-task learning benchmarks. The successful combination of learning and visual guidance could provide a new view on combining BU and TD processing in human vision, and suggests possible directions for both biologically plausible models and artificial instructed models, such as vision-language models (VLMs).
Read more6/18/2024