Neurosymbolic AI for Enhancing Instructability in Generative AI

Read original: arXiv:2407.18722 - Published 7/29/2024 by Amit Sheth, Vishal Pallagani, Kaushik Roy

Neurosymbolic AI for Enhancing Instructability in Generative AI

Overview

Introduces a neurosymbolic AI approach to enhance instructability in generative AI models
Aims to combine the strengths of symbolic and neural approaches to improve AI's ability to follow instructions and complete tasks
Explores techniques like structured priors, neuro-symbolic reasoning, and grounded language modeling

Plain English Explanation

The paper proposes a neurosymbolic AI approach to make it easier for generative AI models to understand and follow instructions. The key idea is to combine the strengths of symbolic AI (which excels at logical reasoning) and neural AI (which is good at learning from data) to create AI systems that can both reason about instructions logically and learn from examples.

Some of the techniques explored include using structured priors to guide the AI's language model towards producing outputs that align with the instructions, incorporating neuro-symbolic reasoning to combine logical rules with neural processing, and developing grounded language models that can better connect language to the real-world context of the task at hand.

The goal is to create AI assistants that can more reliably understand and carry out complex, multi-step instructions - whether that's coding a new software program, assembling furniture, or completing any other task. By blending symbolic and neural approaches, the researchers aim to enhance the "instructability" of generative AI models, making them more transparent, controllable, and aligned with human intent.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a neurosymbolic AI framework to improve the ability of generative AI models to follow instructions and complete tasks. The core idea is to combine the strengths of symbolic AI (rule-based reasoning) and neural AI (data-driven learning) to create more "instructable" AI assistants.

Key components of the framework include:

Structured Priors: Incorporating structured knowledge representations and logical rules into the language model's training process to guide it towards outputs that align with the given instructions.
Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning: Blending neural processing with symbolic reasoning to enable the AI to both learn from data and apply logical rules and constraints.
Grounded Language Modeling: Developing language models that are grounded in the real-world context of the task, improving their ability to connect language to concrete actions and outcomes.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this neurosymbolic approach through experiments on instruction-following tasks, showing improvements in areas like task completion rate, step-by-step fidelity, and transparency of reasoning.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling vision for enhancing the instructability of generative AI models by combining symbolic and neural approaches. The authors acknowledge that current large language models struggle with following complex, multi-step instructions, and the proposed neurosymbolic framework offers a promising path forward.

However, the paper also notes some key limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors highlight the challenge of scaling up the neuro-symbolic reasoning approach to handle the full complexity of real-world tasks. Additionally, the grounded language modeling technique relies on having access to high-quality datasets that can effectively capture the relevant real-world context, which may not always be available.

Further research is also needed to better understand how to effectively integrate structured priors and logical rules into language model training without compromising the models' ability to learn from data and generalize to new situations. Striking the right balance between symbolic and neural components is likely to be crucial for the success of this approach.

Conclusion

The paper presents a compelling neurosymbolic AI framework for enhancing the instructability of generative AI models. By blending symbolic reasoning and neural learning, the approach aims to create AI assistants that can more reliably understand and carry out complex, multi-step instructions across a variety of domains.

While the proposed techniques show promise, the authors acknowledge several key challenges and areas for further research. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step towards developing AI systems that can better understand and align with human intent, a crucial step in making AI more transparent, controllable, and beneficial to society.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Neurosymbolic AI for Enhancing Instructability in Generative AI

Amit Sheth, Vishal Pallagani, Kaushik Roy

Generative AI, especially via Large Language Models (LLMs), has transformed content creation across text, images, and music, showcasing capabilities in following instructions through prompting, largely facilitated by instruction tuning. Instruction tuning is a supervised fine-tuning method where LLMs are trained on datasets formatted with specific tasks and corresponding instructions. This method systematically enhances the model's ability to comprehend and execute the provided directives. Despite these advancements, LLMs still face challenges in consistently interpreting complex, multi-step instructions and generalizing them to novel tasks, which are essential for broader applicability in real-world scenarios. This article explores why neurosymbolic AI offers a better path to enhance the instructability of LLMs. We explore the use a symbolic task planner to decompose high-level instructions into structured tasks, a neural semantic parser to ground these tasks into executable actions, and a neuro-symbolic executor to implement these actions while dynamically maintaining an explicit representation of state. We also seek to show that neurosymbolic approach enhances the reliability and context-awareness of task execution, enabling LLMs to dynamically interpret and respond to a wider range of instructional contexts with greater precision and flexibility.

7/29/2024

💬

A Framework for Neurosymbolic Robot Action Planning using Large Language Models

Alessio Capitanelli, Fulvio Mastrogiovanni

Symbolic task planning is a widely used approach to enforce robot autonomy due to its ease of understanding and deployment in robot architectures. However, techniques for symbolic task planning are difficult to scale in real-world, human-robot collaboration scenarios because of the poor performance in complex planning domains or when frequent re-planning is needed. We present a framework, Teriyaki, specifically aimed at bridging the gap between symbolic task planning and machine learning approaches. The rationale is training Large Language Models (LLMs), namely GPT-3, into a neurosymbolic task planner compatible with the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL), and then leveraging its generative capabilities to overcome a number of limitations inherent to symbolic task planners. Potential benefits include (i) a better scalability in so far as the planning domain complexity increases, since LLMs' response time linearly scales with the combined length of the input and the output, and (ii) the ability to synthesize a plan action-by-action instead of end-to-end, making each action available for execution as soon as it is generated instead of waiting for the whole plan to be available, which in turn enables concurrent planning and execution. Recently, significant efforts have been devoted by the research community to evaluate the cognitive capabilities of LLMs, with alternate successes. Instead, with Teriyaki we aim to provide an overall planning performance comparable to traditional planners in specific planning domains, while leveraging LLMs capabilities to build a look-ahead predictive planning model. Preliminary results in selected domains show that our method can: (i) solve 95.5% of problems in a test data set of 1,000 samples; (ii) produce plans up to 13.5% shorter than a traditional symbolic planner; (iii) reduce average overall waiting times for a plan availability by up to 61.4%

6/5/2024

From Symbolic Tasks to Code Generation: Diversification Yields Better Task Performers

Dylan Zhang, Justin Wang, Francois Charton

Instruction tuning -- tuning large language models on instruction-output pairs -- is a promising technique for making models better adapted to the real world. Yet, the key factors driving the model's capability to understand and follow instructions not seen during training remain under-explored. Our investigation begins with a series of synthetic experiments within the theoretical framework of a Turing-complete algorithm called Markov algorithm, which allows fine-grained control over the instruction-tuning data. Generalization and robustness with respect to the training distribution emerge once a diverse enough set of tasks is provided, even though very few examples are provided for each task. We extend these initial results to a real-world application scenario of code generation and find that a more diverse instruction set, extending beyond code-related tasks, improves the performance of code generation. Our observations suggest that a more diverse semantic space for instruction-tuning sets greatly improves the model's ability to follow instructions and perform tasks.

6/3/2024

SymbolicAI: A framework for logic-based approaches combining generative models and solvers

Marius-Constantin Dinu, Claudiu Leoveanu-Condrei, Markus Holzleitner, Werner Zellinger, Sepp Hochreiter

We introduce SymbolicAI, a versatile and modular framework employing a logic-based approach to concept learning and flow management in generative processes. SymbolicAI enables the seamless integration of generative models with a diverse range of solvers by treating large language models (LLMs) as semantic parsers that execute tasks based on both natural and formal language instructions, thus bridging the gap between symbolic reasoning and generative AI. We leverage probabilistic programming principles to tackle complex tasks, and utilize differentiable and classical programming paradigms with their respective strengths. The framework introduces a set of polymorphic, compositional, and self-referential operations for multi-modal data that connects multi-step generative processes and aligns their outputs with user objectives in complex workflows. As a result, we can transition between the capabilities of various foundation models with in-context learning capabilities and specialized, fine-tuned models or solvers proficient in addressing specific problems. Through these operations based on in-context learning our framework enables the creation and evaluation of explainable computational graphs. Finally, we introduce a quality measure and its empirical score for evaluating these computational graphs, and propose a benchmark that compares various state-of-the-art LLMs across a set of complex workflows. We refer to the empirical score as the Vector Embedding for Relational Trajectory Evaluation through Cross-similarity, or VERTEX score for short. The framework codebase and benchmark are linked below.

8/23/2024