No Free Prune: Information-Theoretic Barriers to Pruning at Initialization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the fundamental limits of pruning neural networks at initialization.
- The authors find that there are inherent information-theoretic barriers that prevent certain types of neural networks from being pruned without significant loss in performance.
- The paper provides theoretical and empirical evidence to support these findings.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at the common practice of pruning neural networks - removing unnecessary connections or weights to make the network more efficient. This is often done at the initialization stage, before the network has been trained.
The authors discovered that there are certain fundamental limits to how much you can prune a neural network at initialization without significantly hurting its performance. This is because the initial structure of the network contains important information that can't be easily removed without losing crucial functionality.
In other words, there's a trade-off between pruning a network and maintaining its ability to learn and perform well on a task. The paper provides both theoretical analysis and experimental evidence to support this conclusion.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an information-theoretic analysis of the pruning process in neural networks. The authors show that for certain types of neural network architectures, there are inherent limits to how much the network can be pruned at initialization without incurring a significant performance penalty.
Specifically, the authors analyze the mutual information between the initial network weights and the optimal final weights after training. They prove that for wide, fully-connected networks, this mutual information is non-zero, meaning that the initial structure contains meaningful information that can't be discarded through pruning.
The paper supports these theoretical findings with extensive experiments on various neural network models and tasks. The results demonstrate that aggressive pruning at initialization leads to a substantial degradation in performance, validating the authors' information-theoretic arguments.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the fundamental limits of pruning neural networks at initialization. The theoretical analysis is rigorous and the experimental evidence is compelling.
However, the paper focuses primarily on fully-connected networks. It would be interesting to see if the authors' insights extend to other common neural network architectures, such as convolutional or recurrent networks.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential workarounds or alternative pruning strategies that could overcome the identified information-theoretic barriers. Further research in this direction could lead to more effective pruning techniques.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to our understanding of the limitations of pruning neural networks at initialization. The authors demonstrate that there are inherent information-theoretic constraints that prevent certain types of networks from being aggressively pruned without significant performance degradation.
These findings have practical implications for the design and optimization of efficient neural network models, as they suggest that simple pruning at initialization may not be sufficient. The paper encourages the community to explore more sophisticated pruning methods and network architectures that can better balance performance and efficiency.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
No Free Prune: Information-Theoretic Barriers to Pruning at Initialization
Tanishq Kumar, Kevin Luo, Mark Sellke
The existence of lottery tickets arXiv:1803.03635 at or near initialization raises the tantalizing question of whether large models are necessary in deep learning, or whether sparse networks can be quickly identified and trained without ever training the dense models that contain them. However, efforts to find these sparse subnetworks without training the dense model (pruning at initialization) have been broadly unsuccessful arXiv:2009.08576. We put forward a theoretical explanation for this, based on the model's effective parameter count, $p_text{eff}$, given by the sum of the number of non-zero weights in the final network and the mutual information between the sparsity mask and the data. We show the Law of Robustness of arXiv:2105.12806 extends to sparse networks with the usual parameter count replaced by $p_text{eff}$, meaning a sparse neural network which robustly interpolates noisy data requires a heavily data-dependent mask. We posit that pruning during and after training outputs masks with higher mutual information than those produced by pruning at initialization. Thus two networks may have the same sparsities, but differ in effective parameter count based on how they were trained. This suggests that pruning near initialization may be infeasible and explains why lottery tickets exist, but cannot be found fast (i.e. without training the full network). Experiments on neural networks confirm that information gained during training may indeed affect model capacity.
Read more7/26/2024
🎯
0
Learning effective pruning at initialization from iterative pruning
Shengkai Liu, Yaofeng Cheng, Fusheng Zha, Wei Guo, Lining Sun, Zhenshan Bing, Chenguang Yang
Pruning at initialization (PaI) reduces training costs by removing weights before training, which becomes increasingly crucial with the growing network size. However, current PaI methods still have a large accuracy gap with iterative pruning, especially at high sparsity levels. This raises an intriguing question: can we get inspiration from iterative pruning to improve the PaI performance? In the lottery ticket hypothesis, the iterative rewind pruning (IRP) finds subnetworks retroactively by rewinding the parameter to the original initialization in every pruning iteration, which means all the subnetworks are based on the initial state. Here, we hypothesise the surviving subnetworks are more important and bridge the initial feature and their surviving score as the PaI criterion. We employ an end-to-end neural network (textbf{AutoS}parse) to learn this correlation, input the model's initial features, output their score and then prune the lowest score parameters before training. To validate the accuracy and generalization of our method, we performed PaI across various models. Results show that our approach outperforms existing methods in high-sparsity settings. Notably, as the underlying logic of model pruning is consistent in different models, only one-time IRP on one model is needed (e.g., once IRP on ResNet-18/CIFAR-10, AutoS can be generalized to VGG-16/CIFAR-10, ResNet-18/TinyImageNet, et al.). As the first neural network-based PaI method, we conduct extensive experiments to validate the factors influencing this approach. These results reveal the learning tendencies of neural networks and provide new insights into our understanding and research of PaI from a practical perspective. Our code is available at: https://github.com/ChengYaofeng/AutoSparse.git.
Read more8/28/2024
🔮
0
Sparsest Models Elude Pruning: An Expos'e of Pruning's Current Capabilities
Stephen Zhang, Vardan Papyan
Pruning has emerged as a promising approach for compressing large-scale models, yet its effectiveness in recovering the sparsest of models has not yet been explored. We conducted an extensive series of 485,838 experiments, applying a range of state-of-the-art pruning algorithms to a synthetic dataset we created, named the Cubist Spiral. Our findings reveal a significant gap in performance compared to ideal sparse networks, which we identified through a novel combinatorial search algorithm. We attribute this performance gap to current pruning algorithms' poor behaviour under overparameterization, their tendency to induce disconnected paths throughout the network, and their propensity to get stuck at suboptimal solutions, even when given the optimal width and initialization. This gap is concerning, given the simplicity of the network architectures and datasets used in our study. We hope that our research encourages further investigation into new pruning techniques that strive for true network sparsity.
Read more7/8/2024
↗️
0
Pruning is Optimal for Learning Sparse Features in High-Dimensions
Nuri Mert Vural, Murat A. Erdogdu
While it is commonly observed in practice that pruning networks to a certain level of sparsity can improve the quality of the features, a theoretical explanation of this phenomenon remains elusive. In this work, we investigate this by demonstrating that a broad class of statistical models can be optimally learned using pruned neural networks trained with gradient descent, in high-dimensions. We consider learning both single-index and multi-index models of the form $y = sigma^*(boldsymbol{V}^{top} boldsymbol{x}) + epsilon$, where $sigma^*$ is a degree-$p$ polynomial, and $boldsymbol{V} in mathbbm{R}^{d times r}$ with $r ll d$, is the matrix containing relevant model directions. We assume that $boldsymbol{V}$ satisfies a certain $ell_q$-sparsity condition for matrices and show that pruning neural networks proportional to the sparsity level of $boldsymbol{V}$ improves their sample complexity compared to unpruned networks. Furthermore, we establish Correlational Statistical Query (CSQ) lower bounds in this setting, which take the sparsity level of $boldsymbol{V}$ into account. We show that if the sparsity level of $boldsymbol{V}$ exceeds a certain threshold, training pruned networks with a gradient descent algorithm achieves the sample complexity suggested by the CSQ lower bound. In the same scenario, however, our results imply that basis-independent methods such as models trained via standard gradient descent initialized with rotationally invariant random weights can provably achieve only suboptimal sample complexity.
Read more6/14/2024