No-Regret M${}^{natural}$-Concave Function Maximization: Stochastic Bandit Algorithms and NP-Hardness of Adversarial Full-Information Setting

Overview

• This paper explores the problem of online maximization of M${}^{natural}$-concave functions, which are a fundamental class of functions with important applications in discrete mathematics and economics.
• In practice, perfect knowledge of these functions may not be available, so the paper studies interactive optimization methods that can learn from feedback.
• The paper presents efficient algorithms for the stochastic bandit setting and an impossibility result for the adversarial setting.

Plain English Explanation

M${}^{natural}$-concave functions are a special type of mathematical function that play a key role in many fields, including discrete mathematics and economics. In the real world, we often don't have complete information about these functions, and can only learn about them through interactive feedback.

Imagine you're trying to maximize the profit from selling a product, but you don't know the exact relationship between the price and the demand. Instead, you can only adjust the price and observe the resulting sales. This is an example of an online M${}^{natural}$-concave function maximization problem.

The paper presents efficient algorithms that can learn to maximize these functions in a stochastic (random) setting, where the feedback has some noise. This is useful for real-world applications where the feedback may not be perfectly reliable. The key insight is that the greedy algorithm, which makes the locally optimal choice at each step, is surprisingly robust to small errors in the function values.

However, the paper also shows that in the adversarial setting, where the feedback can be intentionally misleading, no efficient algorithm can achieve good performance unless P = NP, a fundamental open problem in computer science. This result highlights the inherent difficulty of online optimization in the face of adversarial feedback.

Technical Explanation

The paper studies the problem of online maximization of M${}^{natural}$-concave functions, which are a class of functions that generalize submodular functions and play a crucial role in discrete mathematics and economics.

In the online setting, the function is not known in advance, and the algorithm must learn to maximize it through interactive feedback. The paper considers two different feedback models:

1. Stochastic Bandit Setting: The algorithm has access to unbiased noisy value oracles of the M${}^{natural}$-concave function. The paper presents algorithms that achieve $O(T^{-1/2})$-simple regret and $O(T^{2/3})$-regret, where $T$ is the number of rounds.

2. Adversarial Setting: The algorithm has full-information feedback, but the paper proves that no polynomial-time algorithm can achieve $O(T^{1-c})$ regret for any constant $c > 0$, unless P = NP.

A key technical result is the robustness of the greedy algorithm to local errors in M${}^{natural}$-concave function maximization. This insight allows the design of efficient algorithms in the stochastic setting.

The adversarial setting result is proven by a reduction from the matroid intersection problem, which is a challenging optimization problem in discrete mathematics.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents strong positive results for the stochastic setting, showing that efficient algorithms can learn to maximize M${}^{natural}$-concave functions despite noisy feedback. This is an important practical contribution, as real-world problems often involve noisy or incomplete information.

However, the impossibility result for the adversarial setting is more concerning. It suggests that in the worst-case, where the feedback can be intentionally misleading, no efficient algorithm can perform well, unless a major open problem in computer science is resolved. This highlights the fundamental difficulty of online optimization in the face of adversarial inputs.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it focuses on the theoretical analysis and does not include any empirical evaluation of the proposed algorithms. It would be interesting to see how they perform on real-world datasets and applications, and whether the theoretical guarantees translate to practical benefits.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the trade-offs between the stochastic and adversarial settings, or the potential for hybrid approaches that can leverage the strengths of both. Further research in this direction could lead to more robust and versatile online optimization methods.

Conclusion

This paper makes important contributions to the study of online optimization of M${}^{natural}$-concave functions, a fundamental class of functions with widespread applications. The authors present efficient algorithms for the stochastic setting and an impossibility result for the adversarial setting, highlighting the inherent challenges of learning in the face of incomplete or adversarial feedback.

These findings have significant implications for real-world problems, such as pricing optimization, resource allocation, and decision-making under uncertainty. The paper's insights can inspire further research into more robust and versatile online optimization techniques, ultimately leading to better tools for solving complex problems in a wide range of domains.