No-Regret is not enough! Bandits with General Constraints through Adaptive Regret Minimization

Overview

• The paper introduces a generalized version of the "bandits with knapsacks" (BwK) framework, where the learner faces a set of general long-term constraints, not just resource-consumption constraints.
• The goal is to maximize cumulative reward while minimizing cumulative constraint violations.
• The paper shows that conventional BwK methods can fail to yield sublinear constraint violations in some instances.
• The solution proposed is to use "weakly adaptive" primal and dual regret minimizers, which can self-bound the dual variables without explicit projection steps.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a problem where a learner is trying to make the best decisions over time to maximize their total reward, but they also have to follow certain rules or "constraints". These constraints could be things like limits on the resources they can use.

In the basic "bandits with knapsacks" problem, the learner only has to worry about resource-consumption constraints. But this paper looks at a more general case where the learner faces a broader set of constraints.

The key challenge is that in some situations, the standard methods for the basic bandits with knapsacks problem can't guarantee that the learner will always stay within the constraints. The paper shows a new way to solve this problem by using "weakly adaptive" algorithms for both the main decision-making (the "primal" problem) and for managing the constraints (the "dual" problem).

These weakly adaptive algorithms have a special property - they can automatically keep the constraint violations small, without needing to explicitly project or limit the constraint values. This allows the learner to maximize their reward while reliably staying within the constraints, even in the most challenging situations.

The paper shows that this approach works well both when the problem has a predictable, "stochastic" structure, and when it is completely unpredictable and "adversarial". It also has applications to a related problem called "contextual bandits with linear constraints", providing new guarantees in that setting as well.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the Generalized Bandits with Knapsacks (GBwK) framework, which extends the classic Bandits with Knapsacks (BwK) setting by considering a more general set of long-term constraints, beyond just resource-consumption constraints.

The key technical insight is that in GBwK, there can exist simple problem instances where conventional BwK methods fail to yield sublinear constraint violations. To address this, the paper proposes the use of "weakly adaptive" primal and dual regret minimizers, which can self-bound the dual variables without explicit projection steps.

This self-bounding property of the dual variables arises from the interplay between the primal and dual regret minimizers, and holds even without any prior knowledge about the Slater's parameter (a measure of constraint feasibility).

By exploiting this self-bounding property, the paper establishes best-of-both-worlds guarantees for GBwK under both stochastic and adversarial inputs:

• In the stochastic case, the algorithm achieves sublinear regret.
• In the adversarial case, the algorithm establishes a tight competitive ratio of ρ/(1+ρ), where ρ is the Slater's parameter.

Importantly, the constraint violations are guaranteed to be sublinear in both settings.

Finally, the paper shows how these results can be applied to the problem of contextual bandits with linear constraints, providing the first "no-α-regret" guarantees for adversarial contexts.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful and technically rigorous solution to the Generalized Bandits with Knapsacks problem. The key innovation of using weakly adaptive primal and dual regret minimizers is quite clever, as it allows the algorithm to automatically handle the constraint management without needing explicit projection steps.

One potential limitation is that the paper assumes the constraints are known in advance. It would be interesting to see how the approach could be extended to handle cases where the constraints are also learned over time.

Additionally, while the paper establishes strong theoretical guarantees, it would be helpful to see some empirical evaluation of the proposed algorithm on real-world datasets to understand its practical performance.

Finally, the paper focuses on the regret and constraint violation bounds, but does not deeply explore the potential implications or applications of this work beyond the technical contributions. It would be valuable for the authors to speculate on how these techniques could enable new types of decision-making systems or impact related areas of research, such as incentive-compatible bandits or non-truthful auctions with budgets.

Overall, this is a well-executed piece of research that pushes the boundaries of the bandits with constraints problem. The technical insights and theoretical guarantees provide a strong foundation for further exploration in this area.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a generalized version of the Bandits with Knapsacks (BwK) framework, where the learner faces a broader set of long-term constraints beyond just resource-consumption limits. The key innovation is the use of "weakly adaptive" primal and dual regret minimizers, which can self-bound the constraint violations without explicit projection steps.

By exploiting this self-bounding property of the dual variables, the paper establishes strong theoretical guarantees for the GBwK problem under both stochastic and adversarial settings. These results also enable new insights for the related problem of contextual bandits with linear constraints.

While the paper is primarily focused on the technical contributions, the proposed techniques have the potential to enable new classes of decision-making systems that must balance reward maximization with reliable constraint satisfaction. Further exploration of the practical implications and real-world applications of this work could lead to impactful advancements in sequential decision-making under uncertainty.