No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPO
2405.00662
0
0
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) is inherently rife with non-stationarity since the states and rewards the agent observes during training depend on its changing policy. Therefore, networks in deep RL must be capable of adapting to new observations and fitting new targets. However, previous works have observed that networks in off-policy deep value-based methods exhibit a decrease in representation rank, often correlated with an inability to continue learning or a collapse in performance. Although this phenomenon has generally been attributed to neural network learning under non-stationarity, it has been overlooked in on-policy policy optimization methods which are often thought capable of training indefinitely. In this work, we empirically study representation dynamics in Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) on the Atari and MuJoCo environments, revealing that PPO agents are also affected by feature rank deterioration and loss of plasticity. We show that this is aggravated with stronger non-stationarity, ultimately driving the actor's performance to collapse, regardless of the performance of the critic. We draw connections between representation collapse, performance collapse, and trust region issues in PPO, and present Proximal Feature Optimization (PFO), a novel auxiliary loss, that along with other interventions shows that regularizing the representation dynamics improves the performance of PPO agents.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the connection between representation, collapse, and trust issues in Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), a popular reinforcement learning algorithm.
- The authors investigate how the representation learned by PPO can lead to a collapse of the policy, which in turn undermines the trust that users place in the algorithm.
- The paper provides insights into the inner workings of PPO and suggests ways to improve its robustness and reliability.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines an issue with a popular machine learning algorithm called Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). PPO is used to train AI systems to perform tasks by trial and error, rewarding them when they make good decisions and punishing them when they make bad ones.
The key problem the paper highlights is that the way PPO represents or encodes the information it learns can sometimes lead to a "collapse" of the AI's policy, meaning the AI stops exploring different options and instead settles on a single, suboptimal solution. This collapse in turn undermines the trust that humans can have in the AI system, since its behavior becomes unpredictable and unreliable.
The authors delve into the technical details of how PPO works under the hood, and provide insights into why this representation collapse issue arises. They also suggest ways to modify PPO to make it more robust and trustworthy, such as by improving how it encodes the information it learns.
Overall, the paper sheds light on an important challenge in making AI systems that can be reliably used in real-world applications. By understanding the shortcomings of algorithms like PPO, researchers can work to build more stable and transparent AI that users can trust.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by exploring the connection between the representation learned by PPO, the tendency of the policy to collapse, and the resulting issues of trust in the algorithm.
The authors hypothesize that the representation learned by PPO can lead to a collapse of the policy, where the agent converges to a single, suboptimal solution rather than exploring a diverse set of high-performing policies. This collapse in turn undermines the trust that users can place in the algorithm, as its behavior becomes unpredictable and unreliable.
To investigate this hypothesis, the paper presents a series of experiments that analyze the representations learned by PPO in different settings. The authors find that the representations learned by PPO can indeed be prone to collapse, leading to a lack of diversity in the learned policies.
The paper then delves into the technical details of how PPO works, exploring the role of the policy and value networks, the clipping mechanism, and the objective function. The authors identify specific aspects of the PPO algorithm that contribute to the representation collapse issue, such as the clipping of the policy updates and the use of a shared representation between the policy and value networks.
Based on these insights, the paper suggests several potential approaches to mitigate the representation collapse and trust issues in PPO, such as:
- Separating the policy and value representations
- Incorporating diversity-promoting techniques
- Improving the objective function and optimization process
The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of understanding the inner workings of reinforcement learning algorithms like PPO, in order to develop more reliable and trustworthy AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-researched analysis of the representation collapse and trust issues in PPO. The authors provide a compelling argument for the connection between these concepts and offer valuable insights into the technical details of the algorithm.
One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses solely on the PPO algorithm and does not examine whether these issues are prevalent in other reinforcement learning algorithms as well. It would be interesting to see a comparative analysis across a broader range of RL methods to understand the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential real-world implications of the trust issues in PPO. It would be helpful to explore how these problems might manifest in practical applications and the potential consequences for end-users.
Despite these minor limitations, the paper makes a significant contribution to the understanding of PPO and offers promising directions for future research to improve the robustness and reliability of reinforcement learning algorithms.
Conclusion
This paper provides a deep dive into the representation, collapse, and trust issues associated with the popular Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) reinforcement learning algorithm. The authors demonstrate how the way PPO encodes information can lead to a collapse of the agent's policy, which in turn undermines the trust that users can place in the algorithm.
By shedding light on these technical challenges, the paper offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working to develop more reliable and trustworthy AI systems. The suggested approaches to mitigate the representation collapse and trust issues, such as separating policy and value representations and improving the objective function, present promising avenues for future work in this area.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of the inner workings of reinforcement learning algorithms and highlights the critical importance of ensuring the robustness and transparency of AI systems for real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Reflective Policy Optimization
Yaozhong Gan, Renye Yan, Zhe Wu, Junliang Xing
0
0
On-policy reinforcement learning methods, like Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), often demand extensive data per update, leading to sample inefficiency. This paper introduces Reflective Policy Optimization (RPO), a novel on-policy extension that amalgamates past and future state-action information for policy optimization. This approach empowers the agent for introspection, allowing modifications to its actions within the current state. Theoretical analysis confirms that policy performance is monotonically improved and contracts the solution space, consequently expediting the convergence procedure. Empirical results demonstrate RPO's feasibility and efficacy in two reinforcement learning benchmarks, culminating in superior sample efficiency. The source code of this work is available at https://github.com/Edgargan/RPO.
6/7/2024
DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF
Han Zhong, Guhao Feng, Wei Xiong, Li Zhao, Di He, Jiang Bian, Liwei Wang
0
0
In the classical Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) framework, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is employed to learn from sparse, sentence-level rewards -- a challenging scenario in traditional deep reinforcement learning. Despite the great successes of PPO in the alignment of state-of-the-art closed-source large language models (LLMs), its open-source implementation is still largely sub-optimal, as widely reported by numerous research studies. To address these issues, we introduce a framework that models RLHF problems as a Markov decision process (MDP), enabling the capture of fine-grained token-wise information. Furthermore, we provide theoretical insights that demonstrate the superiority of our MDP framework over the previous sentence-level bandit formulation. Under this framework, we introduce an algorithm, dubbed as Reinforced Token Optimization (texttt{RTO}), which learns the token-wise reward function from preference data and performs policy optimization based on this learned token-wise reward signal. Theoretically, texttt{RTO} is proven to have the capability of finding the near-optimal policy sample-efficiently. For its practical implementation, texttt{RTO} innovatively integrates Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and PPO. DPO, originally derived from sparse sentence rewards, surprisingly provides us with a token-wise characterization of response quality, which is seamlessly incorporated into our subsequent PPO training stage. Extensive real-world alignment experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
4/30/2024
A Study of Plasticity Loss in On-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning
Arthur Juliani, Jordan T. Ash
0
0
Continual learning with deep neural networks presents challenges distinct from both the fixed-dataset and convex continual learning regimes. One such challenge is plasticity loss, wherein a neural network trained in an online fashion displays a degraded ability to fit new tasks. This problem has been extensively studied in both supervised learning and off-policy reinforcement learning (RL), where a number of remedies have been proposed. Still, plasticity loss has received less attention in the on-policy deep RL setting. Here we perform an extensive set of experiments examining plasticity loss and a variety of mitigation methods in on-policy deep RL. We demonstrate that plasticity loss is pervasive under domain shift in this regime, and that a number of methods developed to resolve it in other settings fail, sometimes even resulting in performance that is worse than performing no intervention at all. In contrast, we find that a class of ``regenerative'' methods are able to consistently mitigate plasticity loss in a variety of contexts, including in gridworld tasks and more challenging environments like Montezuma's Revenge and ProcGen.
5/30/2024
🏅
REBEL: Reinforcement Learning via Regressing Relative Rewards
Zhaolin Gao, Jonathan D. Chang, Wenhao Zhan, Owen Oertell, Gokul Swamy, Kiant'e Brantley, Thorsten Joachims, J. Andrew Bagnell, Jason D. Lee, Wen Sun
0
0
While originally developed for continuous control problems, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) has emerged as the work-horse of a variety of reinforcement learning (RL) applications, including the fine-tuning of generative models. Unfortunately, PPO requires multiple heuristics to enable stable convergence (e.g. value networks, clipping), and is notorious for its sensitivity to the precise implementation of these components. In response, we take a step back and ask what a minimalist RL algorithm for the era of generative models would look like. We propose REBEL, an algorithm that cleanly reduces the problem of policy optimization to regressing the relative reward between two completions to a prompt in terms of the policy, enabling strikingly lightweight implementation. In theory, we prove that fundamental RL algorithms like Natural Policy Gradient can be seen as variants of REBEL, which allows us to match the strongest known theoretical guarantees in terms of convergence and sample complexity in the RL literature. REBEL can also cleanly incorporate offline data and be extended to handle the intransitive preferences we frequently see in practice. Empirically, we find that REBEL provides a unified approach to language modeling and image generation with stronger or similar performance as PPO and DPO, all while being simpler to implement and more computationally efficient than PPO. When fine-tuning Llama-3-8B-Instruct, REBEL achieves strong performance in AlpacaEval 2.0, MT-Bench, and Open LLM Leaderboard.
5/30/2024