No Two Devils Alike: Unveiling Distinct Mechanisms of Fine-tuning Attacks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper explores the distinct mechanisms underlying fine-tuning attacks, which are a type of attack on machine learning models that aim to degrade model performance.
• The researchers investigate two different fine-tuning attack scenarios - one targeting the model's parameters and another targeting the model's training data. They demonstrate that these attacks have fundamentally different mechanisms and implications.
Plain English Explanation
• The paper looks at a specific kind of attack on AI models called "fine-tuning attacks." In these attacks, the attacker makes small changes to the model or the data used to train the model, in order to degrade the model's performance.
• The researchers found that there are actually two different ways these fine-tuning attacks can work, with very different underlying mechanisms. One type of attack focuses on changing the parameters (the internal settings) of the model, while the other type of attack targets the training data used to create the model.
• By understanding these distinct attack mechanisms, the researchers hope to help develop better defenses against these kinds of threats to machine learning systems.
Technical Explanation
• The paper investigates two fine-tuning attack scenarios: parameter-space attacks and training-data attacks.
• Parameter-space attacks involve directly perturbing the model parameters during fine-tuning, exploiting the model's sensitivity to parameter changes.
• Training-data attacks involve injecting malicious data into the fine-tuning dataset, leveraging the model's dependence on the training data distribution.
• The authors analyze the distinct properties and attack vectors for each scenario, demonstrating that they have fundamentally different implications for defense strategies.
• For example, parameter-space attacks can be harder to detect as they do not necessarily leave obvious traces in the model or data, while training-data attacks may be more easily identifiable by monitoring the fine-tuning dataset.
Critical Analysis
• The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of fine-tuning attacks, but does not explore potential defenses in depth. Further research is needed to develop robust mitigation techniques for these distinct attack mechanisms.
• The experiments are conducted on a limited set of models and tasks, so the generalizability of the findings to other domains and architectures is unclear and requires additional investigation.
• While the paper establishes the divergent properties of parameter-space and training-data attacks, it does not quantify the relative prevalence or impact of these two attack vectors in real-world settings, which would be valuable for prioritizing defense efforts.
Conclusion
• This paper uncovers the distinct underlying mechanisms of fine-tuning attacks, demonstrating that these threats can manifest in fundamentally different ways.
• By illuminating these divergent attack vectors, the research lays the groundwork for the development of more targeted and effective defenses against fine-tuning attacks, which pose a growing challenge to the robustness of machine learning systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
No Two Devils Alike: Unveiling Distinct Mechanisms of Fine-tuning Attacks
Chak Tou Leong, Yi Cheng, Kaishuai Xu, Jian Wang, Hanlin Wang, Wenjie Li
The existing safety alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is found fragile and could be easily attacked through different strategies, such as through fine-tuning on a few harmful examples or manipulating the prefix of the generation results. However, the attack mechanisms of these strategies are still underexplored. In this paper, we ask the following question: textit{while these approaches can all significantly compromise safety, do their attack mechanisms exhibit strong similarities?} To answer this question, we break down the safeguarding process of an LLM when encountered with harmful instructions into three stages: (1) recognizing harmful instructions, (2) generating an initial refusing tone, and (3) completing the refusal response. Accordingly, we investigate whether and how different attack strategies could influence each stage of this safeguarding process. We utilize techniques such as logit lens and activation patching to identify model components that drive specific behavior, and we apply cross-model probing to examine representation shifts after an attack. In particular, we analyze the two most representative types of attack approaches: Explicit Harmful Attack (EHA) and Identity-Shifting Attack (ISA). Surprisingly, we find that their attack mechanisms diverge dramatically. Unlike ISA, EHA tends to aggressively target the harmful recognition stage. While both EHA and ISA disrupt the latter two stages, the extent and mechanisms of their attacks differ significantly. Our findings underscore the importance of understanding LLMs' internal safeguarding process and suggest that diverse defense mechanisms are required to effectively cope with various types of attacks.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Cross-Task Defense: Instruction-Tuning LLMs for Content Safety
Yu Fu, Wen Xiao, Jia Chen, Jiachen Li, Evangelos Papalexakis, Aichi Chien, Yue Dong
Recent studies reveal that Large Language Models (LLMs) face challenges in balancing safety with utility, particularly when processing long texts for NLP tasks like summarization and translation. Despite defenses against malicious short questions, the ability of LLMs to safely handle dangerous long content, such as manuals teaching illicit activities, remains unclear. Our work aims to develop robust defenses for LLMs in processing malicious documents alongside benign NLP task queries. We introduce a defense dataset comprised of safety-related examples and propose single-task and mixed-task losses for instruction tuning. Our empirical results demonstrate that LLMs can significantly enhance their capacity to safely manage dangerous content with appropriate instruction tuning. Additionally, strengthening the defenses of tasks most susceptible to misuse is effective in protecting LLMs against processing harmful information. We also observe that trade-offs between utility and safety exist in defense strategies, where Llama2, utilizing our proposed approach, displays a significantly better balance compared to Llama1.
Read more5/27/2024
💬
0
Recent Advances in Attack and Defense Approaches of Large Language Models
Jing Cui, Yishi Xu, Zhewei Huang, Shuchang Zhou, Jianbin Jiao, Junge Zhang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized artificial intelligence and machine learning through their advanced text processing and generating capabilities. However, their widespread deployment has raised significant safety and reliability concerns. Established vulnerabilities in deep neural networks, coupled with emerging threat models, may compromise security evaluations and create a false sense of security. Given the extensive research in the field of LLM security, we believe that summarizing the current state of affairs will help the research community better understand the present landscape and inform future developments. This paper reviews current research on LLM vulnerabilities and threats, and evaluates the effectiveness of contemporary defense mechanisms. We analyze recent studies on attack vectors and model weaknesses, providing insights into attack mechanisms and the evolving threat landscape. We also examine current defense strategies, highlighting their strengths and limitations. By contrasting advancements in attack and defense methodologies, we identify research gaps and propose future directions to enhance LLM security. Our goal is to advance the understanding of LLM safety challenges and guide the development of more robust security measures.
Read more9/9/2024
0
Transforming Computer Security and Public Trust Through the Exploration of Fine-Tuning Large Language Models
Garrett Crumrine, Izzat Alsmadi, Jesus Guerrero, Yuvaraj Munian
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized how we interact with machines. However, this technological advancement has been paralleled by the emergence of Mallas, malicious services operating underground that exploit LLMs for nefarious purposes. Such services create malware, phishing attacks, and deceptive websites, escalating the cyber security threats landscape. This paper delves into the proliferation of Mallas by examining the use of various pre-trained language models and their efficiency and vulnerabilities when misused. Building on a dataset from the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) program, it explores fine-tuning methodologies to generate code and explanatory text related to identified vulnerabilities. This research aims to shed light on the operational strategies and exploitation techniques of Mallas, leading to the development of more secure and trustworthy AI applications. The paper concludes by emphasizing the need for further research, enhanced safeguards, and ethical guidelines to mitigate the risks associated with the malicious application of LLMs.
Read more6/4/2024