A Notion of Complexity for Theory of Mind via Discrete World Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• The paper proposes a new approach to modeling "theory of mind" (ToM) - the ability to infer and reason about the mental states of others.
• The authors introduce the concept of "discrete world models" (DWMs) as a way to represent and reason about the world and other agents' mental states.
• The key idea is to define a notion of complexity for DWMs that captures the difficulty of inferring an agent's mental state, which the authors argue is a crucial component of ToM.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is exploring how artificial intelligence (AI) systems can develop a "theory of mind" - the ability to understand and reason about the thoughts, beliefs, and intentions of other agents, whether human or artificial. This is an important capability for AI systems that need to interact with and reason about the behavior of other intelligent entities.
The researchers propose using a framework called "discrete world models" (DWMs) to represent the world and other agents' mental states. The core idea is that the complexity of inferring an agent's mental state is a key part of what makes theory of mind challenging. So the paper introduces a way to measure the complexity of DWMs, which the authors argue provides a principled way to benchmark and evaluate an AI system's theory of mind capabilities.
This work builds on previous research on benchmarking theory of mind, as well as advances in language models and multimodal approaches for reasoning about mental states. The authors hope that their complexity-based framework can help delegate theory of mind reasoning to AI systems and stress test machine theory of mind capabilities.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel framework for modeling "theory of mind" (ToM) based on the concept of "discrete world models" (DWMs). DWMs represent the state of the world and the mental states of other agents using a discrete set of variables and their possible values.
The key contribution of the paper is a formal definition of the "complexity" of a DWM, which captures the difficulty of inferring an agent's mental state from observations of their behavior. This complexity measure is derived from information-theoretic principles and builds on prior work in AI and cognitive science.
The authors demonstrate the usefulness of this complexity metric through several experiments. They show how it can be used to characterize the theory of mind capabilities of different AI systems, as well as how it relates to human performance on ToM tasks. The results suggest that the proposed complexity framework provides a principled way to understand and benchmark the reasoning abilities required for theory of mind.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling and principled approach to modeling theory of mind using discrete world models and information-theoretic complexity. The authors make a strong case for why complexity of mental state inference is a crucial aspect of ToM, and their formal definition of DWM complexity seems well-grounded.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the DWM framework. For example, it's not clear how the approach would scale to more complex, continuous, or partially observable environments. The authors also acknowledge that their complexity metric may not capture all the nuances of human ToM, which likely involves other cognitive processes beyond just mental state inference.
Additionally, while the experimental results are promising, more extensive validation on a wider range of ToM tasks and benchmarks would strengthen the claims about the generality and practical utility of the proposed framework. Comparisons to other leading approaches could also provide useful context.
Overall, this paper presents an interesting and principled step forward in the modeling of theory of mind capabilities in AI systems. But further research is needed to fully evaluate the merits and limitations of the discrete world model complexity approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel framework for modeling theory of mind (ToM) capabilities in artificial intelligence systems. The key idea is to define the "complexity" of discrete world models (DWMs) that represent the state of the world and the mental states of other agents. The authors argue that this complexity measure captures a crucial aspect of ToM - the difficulty of inferring an agent's mental state from observations of their behavior.
The proposed DWM complexity framework provides a principled way to benchmark and evaluate ToM reasoning in AI systems. While there are some limitations that require further investigation, this work represents an important step towards developing AI agents that can understand and reason about the minds of others, a critical capability for effective human-AI interaction and collaboration.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Notion of Complexity for Theory of Mind via Discrete World Models
X. Angelo Huang, Emanuele La Malfa, Samuele Marro, Andrea Asperti, Anthony Cohn, Michael Wooldridge
Theory of Mind (ToM) can be used to assess the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex scenarios where social reasoning is required. While the research community has proposed many ToM benchmarks, their hardness varies greatly, and their complexity is not well defined. This work proposes a framework to measure the complexity of ToM tasks. We quantify a problem's complexity as the number of states necessary to solve it correctly. Our complexity measure also accounts for spurious states of a ToM problem designed to make it apparently harder. We use our method to assess the complexity of five widely adopted ToM benchmarks. On top of this framework, we design a prompting technique that augments the information available to a model with a description of how the environment changes with the agents' interactions. We name this technique Discrete World Models (DWM) and show how it elicits superior performance on ToM tasks.
Read more8/2/2024
💬
0
OpenToM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Theory-of-Mind Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
Hainiu Xu, Runcong Zhao, Lixing Zhu, Jinhua Du, Yulan He
Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM), machine's ability to understand and keep track of the mental states of others, is pivotal in developing socially intelligent agents. However, prevalent N-ToM benchmarks have several shortcomings, including the presence of ambiguous and artificial narratives, absence of personality traits and preferences, a lack of questions addressing characters' psychological mental states, and limited diversity in the questions posed. In response to these issues, we construct OpenToM, a new benchmark for assessing N-ToM with (1) longer and clearer narrative stories, (2) characters with explicit personality traits, (3) actions that are triggered by character intentions, and (4) questions designed to challenge LLMs' capabilities of modeling characters' mental states of both the physical and psychological world. Using OpenToM, we reveal that state-of-the-art LLMs thrive at modeling certain aspects of mental states in the physical world but fall short when tracking characters' mental states in the psychological world.
Read more6/4/2024
0
TimeToM: Temporal Space is the Key to Unlocking the Door of Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind
Guiyang Hou, Wenqi Zhang, Yongliang Shen, Linjuan Wu, Weiming Lu
Theory of Mind (ToM)-the cognitive ability to reason about mental states of ourselves and others, is the foundation of social interaction. Although ToM comes naturally to humans, it poses a significant challenge to even the most advanced Large Language Models (LLMs). Due to the complex logical chains in ToM reasoning, especially in higher-order ToM questions, simply utilizing reasoning methods like Chain of Thought (CoT) will not improve the ToM capabilities of LLMs. We present TimeToM, which constructs a temporal space and uses it as the foundation to improve the ToM capabilities of LLMs in multiple scenarios. Specifically, within the temporal space, we construct Temporal Belief State Chain (TBSC) for each character and inspired by the cognition perspective of the social world model, we divide TBSC into self-world beliefs and social world beliefs, aligning with first-order ToM (first-order beliefs) and higher-order ToM (higher-order beliefs) questions, respectively. Moreover, we design a novel tool-belief solver that, by considering belief communication between characters in temporal space, can transform a character's higher-order beliefs into another character's first-order beliefs under belief communication period. Experimental results indicate that TimeToM can dramatically improve the reasoning performance of LLMs on ToM questions while taking a big step towards coherent and robust ToM reasoning.
Read more7/2/2024
0
LLMs achieve adult human performance on higher-order theory of mind tasks
Winnie Street, John Oliver Siy, Geoff Keeling, Adrien Baranes, Benjamin Barnett, Michael McKibben, Tatenda Kanyere, Alison Lentz, Blaise Aguera y Arcas, Robin I. M. Dunbar
This paper examines the extent to which large language models (LLMs) have developed higher-order theory of mind (ToM); the human ability to reason about multiple mental and emotional states in a recursive manner (e.g. I think that you believe that she knows). This paper builds on prior work by introducing a handwritten test suite -- Multi-Order Theory of Mind Q&A -- and using it to compare the performance of five LLMs to a newly gathered adult human benchmark. We find that GPT-4 and Flan-PaLM reach adult-level and near adult-level performance on ToM tasks overall, and that GPT-4 exceeds adult performance on 6th order inferences. Our results suggest that there is an interplay between model size and finetuning for the realisation of ToM abilities, and that the best-performing LLMs have developed a generalised capacity for ToM. Given the role that higher-order ToM plays in a wide range of cooperative and competitive human behaviours, these findings have significant implications for user-facing LLM applications.
Read more6/3/2024