TimeToM: Temporal Space is the Key to Unlocking the Door of Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind

Read original: arXiv:2407.01455 - Published 7/2/2024 by Guiyang Hou, Wenqi Zhang, Yongliang Shen, Linjuan Wu, Weiming Lu
Total Score

0

TimeToM: Temporal Space is the Key to Unlocking the Door of Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the role of temporal reasoning in the development of theory-of-mind (ToM) capabilities in large language models (LLMs).
  • The authors propose that the ability to reason about time is a key prerequisite for LLMs to achieve human-like ToM, which involves understanding the beliefs, desires, and intentions of others.
  • The paper presents a framework called "TimeToM" that aims to assess and improve the temporal reasoning and ToM capabilities of LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

The paper suggests that the key to unlocking the theory-of-mind (ToM) abilities of large language models (LLMs) lies in their capacity for temporal reasoning. ToM refers to the human ability to understand the thoughts, beliefs, and intentions of others. The authors argue that to achieve human-like ToM, LLMs must first develop a strong grasp of temporal concepts and the ability to reason about time.

The paper introduces a framework called "TimeToM" that is designed to evaluate and enhance the temporal reasoning and ToM capabilities of LLMs. The underlying idea is that by improving an LLM's understanding of time, it will be better equipped to comprehend the perspectives and thought processes of others, which is a crucial aspect of ToM.

By focusing on temporal reasoning, the researchers aim to provide a pathway for LLMs to progress towards more advanced social and cognitive abilities, potentially enabling them to better understand and interact with humans in a more natural and intuitive way.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes that the development of temporal reasoning is a critical prerequisite for large language models (LLMs) to achieve human-like theory-of-mind (ToM) capabilities. ToM refers to the ability to understand the beliefs, desires, and intentions of others.

The authors introduce a framework called "TimeToM" that aims to assess and improve the temporal reasoning and ToM capabilities of LLMs. The framework consists of a set of tasks and benchmarks designed to evaluate an LLM's ability to reason about time, including temporal ordering, temporal causality, and temporal perspective-taking.

The paper reviews relevant literature on topics such as OpenToM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Theory-of-Mind Reasoning in Language Models, Large Language Models Can Learn Temporal Reasoning, and The Notion of Complexity in Theory of Mind via Discrete World. These studies provide important insights into the relationship between temporal reasoning and ToM, as well as the challenges involved in developing these capabilities in LLMs.

The paper also discusses research on Language Models Represent Beliefs of Self and Others and LLMs Achieve Adult Human Performance on Higher-Order Theory of Mind Tasks, which suggests that LLMs can indeed learn to reason about the mental states of others to some degree, but that there is still significant room for improvement.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling argument for the importance of temporal reasoning in the development of theory-of-mind (ToM) capabilities in large language models (LLMs). The authors acknowledge that while LLMs have made significant progress in various language tasks, their ToM abilities remain limited compared to humans.

One potential limitation of the research is that the "TimeToM" framework proposed in the paper has not yet been fully implemented and tested. The effectiveness of this framework in improving LLMs' temporal reasoning and ToM skills will need to be evaluated through further experimentation and empirical studies.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential challenges and complexities involved in designing effective tasks and benchmarks for assessing temporal reasoning and ToM in LLMs. Developing appropriate evaluation methods that can capture the nuances of these cognitive abilities may require further research and refinement.

Another area for further exploration is the potential role of other factors, such as social interaction, emotional understanding, and causal reasoning, in the development of ToM capabilities in LLMs. While the paper focuses on temporal reasoning, a more holistic approach that considers the interplay of various cognitive and social abilities may yield deeper insights.

Despite these potential limitations, the paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to understand and enhance the social and cognitive capabilities of large language models. By emphasizing the importance of temporal reasoning, the authors offer a promising avenue for advancing the field of artificial intelligence and its ability to engage in more natural and meaningful interactions with humans.

Conclusion

The paper "TimeToM: Temporal Space is the Key to Unlocking the Door of Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind" suggests that the ability to reason about time is a critical prerequisite for large language models (LLMs) to develop human-like theory-of-mind (ToM) capabilities.

The authors propose a framework called "TimeToM" that aims to assess and improve the temporal reasoning and ToM abilities of LLMs. By focusing on temporal reasoning, the researchers aim to provide a pathway for LLMs to progress towards more advanced social and cognitive skills, potentially enabling them to better understand and interact with humans in a more natural and intuitive way.

The paper's emphasis on the importance of temporal reasoning in the development of ToM skills in LLMs is a significant contribution to the field of artificial intelligence. Further research and empirical studies will be necessary to fully validate the "TimeToM" framework and explore the broader factors that influence the social and cognitive capabilities of LLMs.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

TimeToM: Temporal Space is the Key to Unlocking the Door of Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind
Total Score

0

TimeToM: Temporal Space is the Key to Unlocking the Door of Large Language Models' Theory-of-Mind

Guiyang Hou, Wenqi Zhang, Yongliang Shen, Linjuan Wu, Weiming Lu

Theory of Mind (ToM)-the cognitive ability to reason about mental states of ourselves and others, is the foundation of social interaction. Although ToM comes naturally to humans, it poses a significant challenge to even the most advanced Large Language Models (LLMs). Due to the complex logical chains in ToM reasoning, especially in higher-order ToM questions, simply utilizing reasoning methods like Chain of Thought (CoT) will not improve the ToM capabilities of LLMs. We present TimeToM, which constructs a temporal space and uses it as the foundation to improve the ToM capabilities of LLMs in multiple scenarios. Specifically, within the temporal space, we construct Temporal Belief State Chain (TBSC) for each character and inspired by the cognition perspective of the social world model, we divide TBSC into self-world beliefs and social world beliefs, aligning with first-order ToM (first-order beliefs) and higher-order ToM (higher-order beliefs) questions, respectively. Moreover, we design a novel tool-belief solver that, by considering belief communication between characters in temporal space, can transform a character's higher-order beliefs into another character's first-order beliefs under belief communication period. Experimental results indicate that TimeToM can dramatically improve the reasoning performance of LLMs on ToM questions while taking a big step towards coherent and robust ToM reasoning.

Read more

7/2/2024

💬

Total Score

0

OpenToM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Theory-of-Mind Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models

Hainiu Xu, Runcong Zhao, Lixing Zhu, Jinhua Du, Yulan He

Neural Theory-of-Mind (N-ToM), machine's ability to understand and keep track of the mental states of others, is pivotal in developing socially intelligent agents. However, prevalent N-ToM benchmarks have several shortcomings, including the presence of ambiguous and artificial narratives, absence of personality traits and preferences, a lack of questions addressing characters' psychological mental states, and limited diversity in the questions posed. In response to these issues, we construct OpenToM, a new benchmark for assessing N-ToM with (1) longer and clearer narrative stories, (2) characters with explicit personality traits, (3) actions that are triggered by character intentions, and (4) questions designed to challenge LLMs' capabilities of modeling characters' mental states of both the physical and psychological world. Using OpenToM, we reveal that state-of-the-art LLMs thrive at modeling certain aspects of mental states in the physical world but fall short when tracking characters' mental states in the psychological world.

Read more

6/4/2024

Large Language Models Can Learn Temporal Reasoning
Total Score

0

Large Language Models Can Learn Temporal Reasoning

Siheng Xiong, Ali Payani, Ramana Kompella, Faramarz Fekri

While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, they are not without their flaws and inaccuracies. Recent studies have introduced various methods to mitigate these limitations. Temporal reasoning (TR), in particular, presents a significant challenge for LLMs due to its reliance on diverse temporal concepts and intricate temporal logic. In this paper, we propose TG-LLM, a novel framework towards language-based TR. Instead of reasoning over the original context, we adopt a latent representation, temporal graph (TG) that enhances the learning of TR. A synthetic dataset (TGQA), which is fully controllable and requires minimal supervision, is constructed for fine-tuning LLMs on this text-to-TG translation task. We confirmed in experiments that the capability of TG translation learned on our dataset can be transferred to other TR tasks and benchmarks. On top of that, we teach LLM to perform deliberate reasoning over the TGs via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) bootstrapping and graph data augmentation. We observed that those strategies, which maintain a balance between usefulness and diversity, bring more reliable CoTs and final results than the vanilla CoT distillation.

Read more

6/12/2024

A Notion of Complexity for Theory of Mind via Discrete World Models
Total Score

0

A Notion of Complexity for Theory of Mind via Discrete World Models

X. Angelo Huang, Emanuele La Malfa, Samuele Marro, Andrea Asperti, Anthony Cohn, Michael Wooldridge

Theory of Mind (ToM) can be used to assess the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex scenarios where social reasoning is required. While the research community has proposed many ToM benchmarks, their hardness varies greatly, and their complexity is not well defined. This work proposes a framework to measure the complexity of ToM tasks. We quantify a problem's complexity as the number of states necessary to solve it correctly. Our complexity measure also accounts for spurious states of a ToM problem designed to make it apparently harder. We use our method to assess the complexity of five widely adopted ToM benchmarks. On top of this framework, we design a prompting technique that augments the information available to a model with a description of how the environment changes with the agents' interactions. We name this technique Discrete World Models (DWM) and show how it elicits superior performance on ToM tasks.

Read more

8/2/2024