A novel framework for systematic propositional formula simplification based on existential graphs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel framework for systematically simplifying propositional formulas using existential graphs.
- The framework aims to provide a more efficient and principled approach to formula simplification compared to traditional methods.
- The research leverages the properties of existential graphs, a diagrammatic logic system, to develop new simplification techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new way to simplify complex logical statements, or formulas, using a visual tool called existential graphs. Logical formulas are used in many areas of computer science and mathematics to represent and reason about information. However, these formulas can become very complicated and difficult to work with, so it's important to find ways to simplify them.
The researchers in this paper propose a systematic framework that leverages the unique properties of existential graphs to streamline the process of simplifying propositional formulas. Propositional formulas are a specific type of logical statement that only uses basic logical connectives like "and," "or," and "not." By representing these formulas as existential graphs and applying certain graph transformation rules, the researchers show how the formulas can be simplified in a more efficient and principled way compared to traditional simplification methods.
The key idea is that the visual nature of existential graphs makes it easier to identify and apply simplification strategies. This can lead to more compact and readable logical expressions, which is important in fields like computer science and mathematics where logical reasoning is critical. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through examples and discuss how it could be further developed and applied.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel framework for systematically simplifying propositional formulas using the formalism of existential graphs. Existential graphs are a diagrammatic logic system developed by the philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce, which represents logical statements as graphs rather than symbolic expressions.
The researchers leverage the unique properties of existential graphs to derive new simplification techniques for propositional formulas. They define a set of graph transformation rules that can be systematically applied to existential graph representations of formulas to reduce their complexity. These rules exploit structural features of the graphs, such as the ability to eliminate redundant or contradictory substructures, to simplify the underlying logical expressions.
The proposed framework is designed to provide a more principled and efficient approach to formula simplification compared to traditional methods. By working directly with the graphical representations, the researchers argue that their techniques can more readily identify and apply simplification strategies. This is in contrast to symbolic approaches that may require more ad hoc manipulations of the formula syntax.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the existential graph-based simplification framework through examples and discusses how it could be further developed and applied. The researchers note that the visual nature of existential graphs may also facilitate educational and collaborative aspects of logical reasoning, as the simplified formulas can be more readily understood and communicated. The framework's potential connections to other areas of [logical reasoning and graph-based representations](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/probabilistic-causal-satisfiability-impact-marginalization, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/lifted-inference-beyond-first-order-logic, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/temporal-inductive-logic-reasoning-over-hypergraphs, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/learning-visual-semantic-subspace-representations-propositional-reasoning) are also briefly explored.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling and well-structured framework for simplifying propositional formulas using existential graphs. The researchers have clearly articulated the motivations and potential benefits of their approach, and the technical details appear to be sound and well-executed.
One potential limitation of the work is the focus on propositional formulas, which are a relatively simple form of logical expression. While the researchers mention the possibility of extending their techniques to more expressive logics, the current scope may limit the immediate applicability of the framework to more complex real-world problems. Further research would be needed to assess the scalability and generalizability of the existential graph-based simplification methods.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison of the proposed framework to other state-of-the-art formula simplification techniques. While the researchers argue for the advantages of their approach, a more rigorous empirical evaluation against alternative methods would help to strengthen the claims and provide a clearer understanding of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the existential graph-based approach.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents a promising step towards more efficient and principled logical reasoning. The use of existential graphs as a basis for simplification is an intriguing and innovative idea that warrants further exploration and development. As the researchers suggest, the visual nature of the approach may also open up new opportunities for educational and collaborative applications in the field of formal logic.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel framework for systematically simplifying propositional formulas using the formalism of existential graphs. The researchers leverage the unique properties of existential graphs to derive new graph transformation rules that can be applied to reduce the complexity of logical expressions in a principled manner.
The proposed approach aims to provide a more efficient and accessible alternative to traditional formula simplification techniques, which can be particularly valuable in domains where logical reasoning is critical, such as computer science and mathematics. The visual nature of existential graphs may also facilitate educational and collaborative aspects of logical reasoning.
While the current scope of the work is limited to propositional formulas, the researchers discuss the potential for extending their techniques to more expressive logics. Further research and empirical evaluation would be needed to fully assess the scalability and generalizability of the existential graph-based simplification framework. Nonetheless, this paper represents an innovative and promising contribution to the field of logical reasoning and formula simplification.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A novel framework for systematic propositional formula simplification based on existential graphs
Jordina Franc`es de Mas, Juliana Bowles
This paper presents a novel simplification calculus for propositional logic derived from Peirce's existential graphs' rules of inference and implication graphs. Our rules can be applied to propositional logic formulae in nested form, are equivalence-preserving, guarantee a monotonically decreasing number of variables, clauses and literals, and maximise the preservation of structural problem information. Our techniques can also be seen as higher-level SAT preprocessing, and we show how one of our rules (TWSR) generalises and streamlines most of the known equivalence-preserving SAT preprocessing methods. In addition, we propose a simplification procedure based on the systematic application of two of our rules (EPR and TWSR) which is solver-agnostic and can be used to simplify large Boolean satisfiability problems and propositional formulae in arbitrary form, and we provide a formal analysis of its algorithmic complexity in terms of space and time. Finally, we show how our rules can be further extended with a novel n-ary implication graph to capture all known equivalence-preserving preprocessing procedures.
Read more5/28/2024
0
A Neural Rewriting System to Solve Algorithmic Problems
Flavio Petruzzellis, Alberto Testolin, Alessandro Sperduti
Modern neural network architectures still struggle to learn algorithmic procedures that require to systematically apply compositional rules to solve out-of-distribution problem instances. In this work, we focus on formula simplification problems, a class of synthetic benchmarks used to study the systematic generalization capabilities of neural architectures. We propose a modular architecture designed to learn a general procedure for solving nested mathematical formulas by only relying on a minimal set of training examples. Inspired by rewriting systems, a classic framework in symbolic artificial intelligence, we include in the architecture three specialized and interacting modules: the Selector, trained to identify solvable sub-expressions; the Solver, mapping sub-expressions to their values; and the Combiner, replacing sub-expressions in the original formula with the solution provided by the Solver. We benchmark our system against the Neural Data Router, a recent model specialized for systematic generalization, and a state-of-the-art large language model (GPT-4) probed with advanced prompting strategies. We demonstrate that our approach achieves a higher degree of out-of-distribution generalization compared to these alternative approaches on three different types of formula simplification problems, and we discuss its limitations by analyzing its failures.
Read more7/15/2024
🧠
0
A Logic for Reasoning About Aggregate-Combine Graph Neural Networks
Pierre Nunn, Marco Salzer, Franc{c}ois Schwarzentruber, Nicolas Troquard
We propose a modal logic in which counting modalities appear in linear inequalities. We show that each formula can be transformed into an equivalent graph neural network (GNN). We also show that a broad class of GNNs can be transformed efficiently into a formula, thus significantly improving upon the literature about the logical expressiveness of GNNs. We also show that the satisfiability problem is PSPACE-complete. These results bring together the promise of using standard logical methods for reasoning about GNNs and their properties, particularly in applications such as GNN querying, equivalence checking, etc. We prove that such natural problems can be solved in polynomial space.
Read more5/2/2024
🏅
0
Probabilistic and Causal Satisfiability: the Impact of Marginalization
Julian Dorfler, Benito van der Zander, Markus Blaser, Maciej Liskiewicz
The framework of Pearl's Causal Hierarchy (PCH) formalizes three types of reasoning: observational, interventional, and counterfactual, that reflect the progressive sophistication of human thought regarding causation. We investigate the computational complexity aspects of reasoning in this framework focusing mainly on satisfiability problems expressed in probabilistic and causal languages across the PCH. That is, given a system of formulas in the standard probabilistic and causal languages, does there exist a model satisfying the formulas? The resulting complexity changes depending on the level of the hierarchy as well as the operators allowed in the formulas (addition, multiplication, or marginalization). We focus on formulas involving marginalization that are widely used in probabilistic and causal inference, but whose complexity issues are still little explored. Our main contribution are the exact computational complexity results showing that linear languages (allowing addition and marginalization) yield NP^PP-, PSPACE-, and NEXP-complete satisfiability problems, depending on the level of the PCH. Moreover, we prove that the problem for the full language (allowing additionally multiplication) is complete for the class succ$exists$R for languages on the highest, counterfactual level, which extends previous results for the lower levels of the PCH. Finally, we consider constrained models that are restricted to a given Bayesian network, a Directed Acyclic Graph structure, or a small polynomial size. The complexity of languages on the interventional level is increased to the complexity of counterfactual languages without such a constraint, that is, linear languages become NEXP-complete. On the other hand, the complexity on the counterfactual level does not change. The constraint on the size reduces the complexity of the interventional and counterfactual languages to NEXP-complete.
Read more6/10/2024