A Logic for Reasoning About Aggregate-Combine Graph Neural Networks
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The researchers propose a new modal logic that incorporates counting modalities (numerical constraints) into linear inequalities.
- They show that each formula in this logic can be transformed into an equivalent graph neural network (GNN).
- Conversely, they demonstrate that a broad class of GNNs can be efficiently transformed into a logical formula, significantly improving upon prior work on the logical expressiveness of GNNs.
- The researchers also prove that the satisfiability problem for this logic is PSPACE-complete, meaning it can be solved in polynomial space.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers have developed a new type of logical system that can represent numerical constraints, such as "at least 3 nodes have a certain property" or "the sum of the node values is less than 10". This allows the logic to more accurately model real-world scenarios where counting and numerical relationships are important.
The key insight is that each formula in this logic can be transformed into an equivalent graph neural network (GNN) - a powerful machine learning model for processing and reasoning about graph-structured data. Conversely, the researchers show that many GNNs can also be transformed into a logical formula, bridging the gap between these two powerful tools for reasoning about complex data and learning latent representations.
This work helps establish the logical expressiveness of GNNs and opens up new possibilities for using standard logical reasoning techniques to analyze and query GNN-based systems, such as enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose a new modal logic called Counting Modal Logic (CML), which extends standard modal logic by allowing counting modalities to appear in linear inequalities. For example, the formula ⟨≥3⟩p would express that at least 3 nodes satisfy the property p.
They show that every CML formula can be transformed into an equivalent GNN, where the GNN's node and edge features, as well as its message-passing and aggregation functions, are determined by the structure of the formula. Conversely, they demonstrate that a broad class of GNNs can be efficiently transformed into an equivalent CML formula, significantly expanding upon prior work on the logical expressiveness of GNNs.
The researchers also analyze the computational complexity of CML, proving that the satisfiability problem is PSPACE-complete. This means that CML formulas can be efficiently checked for satisfiability using polynomial space, rather than the exponential space required for more expressive logics.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have made a significant contribution by bridging the gap between logical reasoning and graph neural networks. By showing the equivalence between CML formulas and GNNs, they have laid the groundwork for using standard logical methods to reason about the properties and behaviors of GNN-based systems.
However, the researchers acknowledge that the class of GNNs that can be transformed into CML formulas is still relatively limited. There may be important GNN architectures and capabilities that are not captured by the CML framework. Additionally, the PSPACE-completeness result, while an important theoretical insight, does not necessarily translate to efficient practical algorithms for solving CML problems.
Future research could explore extensions or generalizations of the CML framework to cover a wider range of GNN architectures and reasoning tasks. It would also be valuable to investigate the practical implications of this work, such as the development of CML-based tools for querying, verifying, and analyzing GNN-based systems.
Conclusion
The researchers have proposed a novel modal logic that can represent numerical constraints and has been shown to be equivalent to a broad class of graph neural networks. This work bridges the gap between logical reasoning and GNN-based machine learning, enabling the use of standard logical techniques to analyze and reason about GNN-based systems.
The PSPACE-completeness result suggests that CML formulas can be efficiently checked for satisfiability, which could have important implications for the development of scalable GNN-based reasoning systems. Overall, this research represents a significant advancement in our understanding of the logical expressiveness of GNNs and opens up new avenues for incorporating logical reasoning into real-world AI applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
A Logic for Reasoning About Aggregate-Combine Graph Neural Networks
Pierre Nunn, Marco Salzer, Franc{c}ois Schwarzentruber, Nicolas Troquard
We propose a modal logic in which counting modalities appear in linear inequalities. We show that each formula can be transformed into an equivalent graph neural network (GNN). We also show that a broad class of GNNs can be transformed efficiently into a formula, thus significantly improving upon the literature about the logical expressiveness of GNNs. We also show that the satisfiability problem is PSPACE-complete. These results bring together the promise of using standard logical methods for reasoning about GNNs and their properties, particularly in applications such as GNN querying, equivalence checking, etc. We prove that such natural problems can be solved in polynomial space.
Read more5/2/2024
🧠
0
Logical Distillation of Graph Neural Networks
Alexander Pluska, Pascal Welke, Thomas Gartner, Sagar Malhotra
We present a logic based interpretable model for learning on graphs and an algorithm to distill this model from a Graph Neural Network (GNN). Recent results have shown connections between the expressivity of GNNs and the two-variable fragment of first-order logic with counting quantifiers (C2). We introduce a decision-tree based model which leverages an extension of C2 to distill interpretable logical classifiers from GNNs. We test our approach on multiple GNN architectures. The distilled models are interpretable, succinct, and attain similar accuracy to the underlying GNN. Furthermore, when the ground truth is expressible in C2, our approach outperforms the GNN.
Read more8/22/2024
0
Graph Reasoning Networks
Markus Zopf, Francesco Alesiani
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are the predominant approach for graph-based machine learning. While neural networks have shown great performance at learning useful representations, they are often criticized for their limited high-level reasoning abilities. In this work, we present Graph Reasoning Networks (GRNs), a novel approach to combine the strengths of fixed and learned graph representations and a reasoning module based on a differentiable satisfiability solver. While results on real-world datasets show comparable performance to GNN, experiments on synthetic datasets demonstrate the potential of the newly proposed method.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Neural Probabilistic Logic Learning for Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Fengsong Sun, Jinyu Wang, Zhiqing Wei, Xianchao Zhang
Knowledge graph (KG) reasoning is a task that aims to predict unknown facts based on known factual samples. Reasoning methods can be divided into two categories: rule-based methods and KG-embedding based methods. The former possesses precise reasoning capabilities but finds it challenging to reason efficiently over large-scale knowledge graphs. While gaining the ability to reason over large-scale knowledge graphs, the latter sacrifices reasoning accuracy. This paper aims to design a reasoning framework called Neural Probabilistic Logic Learning(NPLL) that achieves accurate reasoning on knowledge graphs. Our approach introduces a scoring module that effectively enhances the expressive power of embedding networks, striking a balance between model simplicity and reasoning capabilities. We improve the interpretability of the model by incorporating a Markov Logic Network based on variational inference. We empirically evaluate our approach on several benchmark datasets, and the experimental results validate that our method substantially enhances the accuracy and quality of the reasoning results.
Read more7/8/2024