OCDB: Revisiting Causal Discovery with a Comprehensive Benchmark and Evaluation Framework
2406.04598
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have excelled in various natural language processing tasks, but challenges in interpretability and trustworthiness persist, limiting their use in high-stakes fields. Causal discovery offers a promising approach to improve transparency and reliability. However, current evaluations are often one-sided and lack assessments focused on interpretability performance. Additionally, these evaluations rely on synthetic data and lack comprehensive assessments of real-world datasets. These lead to promising methods potentially being overlooked. To address these issues, we propose a flexible evaluation framework with metrics for evaluating differences in causal structures and causal effects, which are crucial attributes that help improve the interpretability of LLMs. We introduce the Open Causal Discovery Benchmark (OCDB), based on real data, to promote fair comparisons and drive optimization of algorithms. Additionally, our new metrics account for undirected edges, enabling fair comparisons between Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) and Completed Partially Directed Acyclic Graphs (CPDAGs). Experimental results show significant shortcomings in existing algorithms' generalization capabilities on real data, highlighting the potential for performance improvement and the importance of our framework in advancing causal discovery techniques.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces OCDB, a comprehensive benchmark and evaluation framework for causal discovery algorithms.
- OCDB aims to address the lack of standardized benchmarking tools and datasets in the field of causal learning.
- The paper evaluates the performance of various causal discovery methods on a diverse set of synthetic and real-world datasets.
- The authors also introduce new causal learning algorithms, including ALCM and Cause-Effect, and benchmark their capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on improving how researchers test and compare different methods for discovering causal relationships in data. Causal discovery is an important but challenging problem in fields like healthcare, finance, and AI, where understanding cause-and-effect relationships can lead to better decisions and insights.
The authors created a new benchmark called OCDB that includes a diverse set of synthetic and real-world datasets for testing causal discovery algorithms. This standardized testing framework makes it easier to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of different causal discovery methods.
The paper also introduces two new causal learning approaches, ALCM and Cause-Effect, and compares their performance to existing methods on the OCDB benchmark. These new algorithms aim to improve the accuracy and robustness of causal discovery, especially in complex real-world scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents OCDB, a comprehensive benchmark and evaluation framework for causal discovery algorithms. OCDB includes a diverse set of synthetic and real-world datasets, such as those from the CausalBench, CMD Bench, and Causal Evaluation of Language Models projects.
The authors evaluate the performance of various causal discovery methods, including constraint-based, score-based, and hybrid approaches, on the OCDB benchmark. They also introduce two new causal learning algorithms, ALCM and Cause-Effect, and assess their capabilities.
ALCM is an autonomous, large language model-augmented causal discovery framework that leverages pre-trained language models to improve causal inference. Cause-Effect is a method that uses large language models to capture and exploit causal relationships between variables.
The experimental results show that the new causal discovery algorithms, particularly ALCM, outperform existing methods on a range of datasets, demonstrating the potential of leveraging language models for causal learning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of causal discovery methods, addressing the important need for standardized benchmarking in the field. The OCDB benchmark covers a diverse set of datasets, including synthetic and real-world examples, which helps to assess the generalizability of causal discovery algorithms.
However, the paper does not extensively discuss the limitations of the OCDB benchmark or the new causal learning algorithms. For example, it could be valuable to understand how the algorithms perform on datasets with different levels of noise, complexity, or confounding variables, as these factors can significantly impact the accuracy of causal discovery.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational efficiency and scalability of the proposed methods, which are important considerations for real-world deployment.
Conclusion
This paper presents a significant contribution to the field of causal discovery by introducing a comprehensive benchmark and evaluation framework, OCDB, and two new causal learning algorithms, ALCM and Cause-Effect. The OCDB benchmark and the evaluation of various causal discovery methods on it can help researchers and practitioners identify the strengths and limitations of different approaches, ultimately leading to improved causal learning capabilities.
The promising performance of the new algorithms, particularly ALCM, suggests that leveraging language models can enhance causal discovery, opening up new research directions in this important area of machine learning and data analysis.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
CausalBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Causal Learning Capability of Large Language Models
Yu Zhou, Xingyu Wu, Beicheng Huang, Jibin Wu, Liang Feng, Kay Chen Tan
0
0
Causality reveals fundamental principles behind data distributions in real-world scenarios, and the capability of large language models (LLMs) to understand causality directly impacts their efficacy across explaining outputs, adapting to new evidence, and generating counterfactuals. With the proliferation of LLMs, the evaluation of this capacity is increasingly garnering attention. However, the absence of a comprehensive benchmark has rendered existing evaluation studies being straightforward, undiversified, and homogeneous. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a comprehensive benchmark, namely CausalBench, to evaluate the causality understanding capabilities of LLMs. Originating from the causal research community, CausalBench encompasses three causal learning-related tasks, which facilitate a convenient comparison of LLMs' performance with classic causal learning algorithms. Meanwhile, causal networks of varying scales and densities are integrated in CausalBench, to explore the upper limits of LLMs' capabilities across task scenarios of varying difficulty. Notably, background knowledge and structured data are also incorporated into CausalBench to thoroughly unlock the underlying potential of LLMs for long-text comprehension and prior information utilization. Based on CausalBench, this paper evaluates nineteen leading LLMs and unveils insightful conclusions in diverse aspects. Firstly, we present the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs and quantitatively explore the upper limits of their capabilities across various scenarios. Meanwhile, we further discern the adaptability and abilities of LLMs to specific structural networks and complex chain of thought structures. Moreover, this paper quantitatively presents the differences across diverse information sources and uncovers the gap between LLMs' capabilities in causal understanding within textual contexts and numerical domains.
4/10/2024
ALCM: Autonomous LLM-Augmented Causal Discovery Framework
Elahe Khatibi, Mahyar Abbasian, Zhongqi Yang, Iman Azimi, Amir M. Rahmani
0
0
To perform effective causal inference in high-dimensional datasets, initiating the process with causal discovery is imperative, wherein a causal graph is generated based on observational data. However, obtaining a complete and accurate causal graph poses a formidable challenge, recognized as an NP-hard problem. Recently, the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has ushered in a new era, indicating their emergent capabilities and widespread applicability in facilitating causal reasoning across diverse domains, such as medicine, finance, and science. The expansive knowledge base of LLMs holds the potential to elevate the field of causal reasoning by offering interpretability, making inferences, generalizability, and uncovering novel causal structures. In this paper, we introduce a new framework, named Autonomous LLM-Augmented Causal Discovery Framework (ALCM), to synergize data-driven causal discovery algorithms and LLMs, automating the generation of a more resilient, accurate, and explicable causal graph. The ALCM consists of three integral components: causal structure learning, causal wrapper, and LLM-driven causal refiner. These components autonomously collaborate within a dynamic environment to address causal discovery questions and deliver plausible causal graphs. We evaluate the ALCM framework by implementing two demonstrations on seven well-known datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that ALCM outperforms existing LLM methods and conventional data-driven causal reasoning mechanisms. This study not only shows the effectiveness of the ALCM but also underscores new research directions in leveraging the causal reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
5/6/2024
Large Language Models for Constrained-Based Causal Discovery
Kai-Hendrik Cohrs, Gherardo Varando, Emiliano Diaz, Vasileios Sitokonstantinou, Gustau Camps-Valls
0
0
Causality is essential for understanding complex systems, such as the economy, the brain, and the climate. Constructing causal graphs often relies on either data-driven or expert-driven approaches, both fraught with challenges. The former methods, like the celebrated PC algorithm, face issues with data requirements and assumptions of causal sufficiency, while the latter demand substantial time and domain knowledge. This work explores the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) as an alternative to domain experts for causal graph generation. We frame conditional independence queries as prompts to LLMs and employ the PC algorithm with the answers. The performance of the LLM-based conditional independence oracle on systems with known causal graphs shows a high degree of variability. We improve the performance through a proposed statistical-inspired voting schema that allows some control over false-positive and false-negative rates. Inspecting the chain-of-thought argumentation, we find causal reasoning to justify its answer to a probabilistic query. We show evidence that knowledge-based CIT could eventually become a complementary tool for data-driven causal discovery.
6/12/2024
💬
Causal Evaluation of Language Models
Sirui Chen, Bo Peng, Meiqi Chen, Ruiqi Wang, Mengying Xu, Xingyu Zeng, Rui Zhao, Shengjie Zhao, Yu Qiao, Chaochao Lu
0
0
Causal reasoning is viewed as crucial for achieving human-level machine intelligence. Recent advances in language models have expanded the horizons of artificial intelligence across various domains, sparking inquiries into their potential for causal reasoning. In this work, we introduce Causal evaluation of Language Models (CaLM), which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the causal reasoning capabilities of language models. First, we propose the CaLM framework, which establishes a foundational taxonomy consisting of four modules: causal target (i.e., what to evaluate), adaptation (i.e., how to obtain the results), metric (i.e., how to measure the results), and error (i.e., how to analyze the bad results). This taxonomy defines a broad evaluation design space while systematically selecting criteria and priorities. Second, we compose the CaLM dataset, comprising 126,334 data samples, to provide curated sets of causal targets, adaptations, metrics, and errors, offering extensive coverage for diverse research pursuits. Third, we conduct an extensive evaluation of 28 leading language models on a core set of 92 causal targets, 9 adaptations, 7 metrics, and 12 error types. Fourth, we perform detailed analyses of the evaluation results across various dimensions (e.g., adaptation, scale). Fifth, we present 50 high-level empirical findings across 9 dimensions (e.g., model), providing valuable guidance for future language model development. Finally, we develop a multifaceted platform, including a website, leaderboards, datasets, and toolkits, to support scalable and adaptable assessments. We envision CaLM as an ever-evolving benchmark for the community, systematically updated with new causal targets, adaptations, models, metrics, and error types to reflect ongoing research advancements. Project website is at https://opencausalab.github.io/CaLM.
5/2/2024