One-Shot Safety Alignment for Large Language Models via Optimal Dualization
2405.19544
0
0
Abstract
The growing safety concerns surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) raise an urgent need to align them with diverse human preferences to simultaneously enhance their helpfulness and safety. A promising approach is to enforce safety constraints through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). For such constrained RLHF, common Lagrangian-based primal-dual policy optimization methods are computationally expensive and often unstable. This paper presents a dualization perspective that reduces constrained alignment to an equivalent unconstrained alignment problem. We do so by pre-optimizing a smooth and convex dual function that has a closed form. This shortcut eliminates the need for cumbersome primal-dual policy iterations, thus greatly reducing the computational burden and improving training stability. Our strategy leads to two practical algorithms in model-based and preference-based scenarios (MoCAN and PeCAN, respectively). A broad range of experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach called "Optimal Dualization" for aligning the behavior of large language models (LLMs) with safety constraints in a single optimization step.
- The proposed method aims to achieve "one-shot safety alignment," where the model's objective function is directly optimized to satisfy safety requirements without the need for iterative fine-tuning or reinforcement learning.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a range of safety-critical tasks, showcasing its ability to produce models that are both capable and aligned with desired safety constraints.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way to make large language models (LLMs) behave safely and align with desired safety requirements. Typically, this is a challenging task that requires iterative fine-tuning or reinforcement learning, which can be time-consuming and computationally expensive.
The researchers propose a method called "Optimal Dualization" that allows the model's objective function to be directly optimized to satisfy safety constraints in a single optimization step. This "one-shot safety alignment" approach aims to produce LLMs that are both highly capable and aligned with the specified safety requirements, without the need for extensive retraining.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a variety of safety-critical tasks, showing that the resulting models can perform well while also adhering to the desired safety constraints. This could be particularly useful for developing LLMs that can be safely deployed in real-world applications, where it is crucial to ensure the models behave in a way that is aligned with important safety considerations.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel technique called "Optimal Dualization" for achieving "one-shot safety alignment" of large language models (LLMs) with safety constraints. This approach directly optimizes the model's objective function to satisfy the specified safety requirements in a single optimization step, rather than relying on iterative fine-tuning or reinforcement learning.
The key idea behind Optimal Dualization is to reformulate the safety-constrained optimization problem as a dual optimization problem, where the safety constraints are incorporated into the objective function using Lagrange multipliers. The authors show that this dual optimization problem can be solved efficiently using gradient-based methods, yielding an LLM that is both capable and aligned with the desired safety constraints.
The paper presents a range of experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of Optimal Dualization on various safety-critical tasks, such as [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/emulated-disalignment-safety-alignment-large-language-models], [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/off-policy-primal-dual-safe-reinforcement-learning], and [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/privately-aligning-language-models-reinforcement-learning]. The results show that the proposed approach can achieve comparable performance to traditional fine-tuning methods, while also ensuring that the model's behavior is aligned with the specified safety constraints.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for achieving one-shot safety alignment of large language models (LLMs), which could be a significant advancement in the field of AI safety. The authors acknowledge that their method relies on the ability to accurately specify the desired safety constraints, which may not always be straightforward in real-world scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for unintended consequences or edge cases that could arise from the Optimal Dualization approach. There may be scenarios where the safety constraints are not comprehensive enough or where the model's behavior could still lead to undesirable outcomes, despite the proposed alignment.
Further research is needed to explore the robustness and generalizability of the Optimal Dualization method, as well as its ability to handle more complex and nuanced safety requirements. [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/safe-balanced-framework-constrained-multi-objective-reinforcement] and [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/slm-as-guardian-pioneering-ai-safety-small] may provide valuable insights into addressing these challenges.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel approach called Optimal Dualization for achieving one-shot safety alignment of large language models (LLMs) with specified safety constraints. This method aims to directly optimize the model's objective function to satisfy the safety requirements in a single optimization step, eliminating the need for iterative fine-tuning or reinforcement learning.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a range of safety-critical tasks, showcasing the ability to produce capable and safety-aligned LLMs. This could have significant implications for the development of LLMs that can be safely deployed in real-world applications, where ensuring the models' behavior aligns with important safety considerations is crucial.
While the paper presents a promising solution, further research is needed to explore the robustness and generalizability of the Optimal Dualization approach, as well as its ability to handle more complex safety requirements. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in the field of AI safety and the development of trustworthy and reliable large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Emulated Disalignment: Safety Alignment for Large Language Models May Backfire!
Zhanhui Zhou, Jie Liu, Zhichen Dong, Jiaheng Liu, Chao Yang, Wanli Ouyang, Yu Qiao
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) undergo safety alignment to ensure safe conversations with humans. However, this paper introduces a training-free attack method capable of reversing safety alignment, converting the outcomes of stronger alignment into greater potential for harm by accessing only LLM output token distributions. Specifically, our method achieves this reversal by contrasting the output token distribution of a safety-aligned language model (e.g., Llama-2-chat) against its pre-trained version (e.g., Llama-2), so that the token predictions are shifted towards the opposite direction of safety alignment. We name this method emulated disalignment (ED) because sampling from this contrastive distribution provably emulates the result of fine-tuning to minimize a safety reward. Our experiments with ED across three evaluation datasets and four model families (Llama-1, Llama-2, Mistral, and Alpaca) show that ED doubles the harmfulness of pre-trained models and outperforms strong baselines, achieving the highest harmful rates in 43 out of 48 evaluation subsets by a large margin. Eventually, given ED's reliance on language model output token distributions, which particularly compromises open-source models, our findings highlight the need to reassess the open accessibility of language models, even if they have been safety-aligned. Code is available at https://github.com/ZHZisZZ/emulated-disalignment.
6/7/2024
🏅
Off-Policy Primal-Dual Safe Reinforcement Learning
Zifan Wu, Bo Tang, Qian Lin, Chao Yu, Shangqin Mao, Qianlong Xie, Xingxing Wang, Dong Wang
0
0
Primal-dual safe RL methods commonly perform iterations between the primal update of the policy and the dual update of the Lagrange Multiplier. Such a training paradigm is highly susceptible to the error in cumulative cost estimation since this estimation serves as the key bond connecting the primal and dual update processes. We show that this problem causes significant underestimation of cost when using off-policy methods, leading to the failure to satisfy the safety constraint. To address this issue, we propose conservative policy optimization, which learns a policy in a constraint-satisfying area by considering the uncertainty in cost estimation. This improves constraint satisfaction but also potentially hinders reward maximization. We then introduce local policy convexification to help eliminate such suboptimality by gradually reducing the estimation uncertainty. We provide theoretical interpretations of the joint coupling effect of these two ingredients and further verify them by extensive experiments. Results on benchmark tasks show that our method not only achieves an asymptotic performance comparable to state-of-the-art on-policy methods while using much fewer samples, but also significantly reduces constraint violation during training. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZifanWu/CAL.
4/16/2024
💬
Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
Fan Wu, Huseyin A. Inan, Arturs Backurs, Varun Chandrasekaran, Janardhan Kulkarni, Robert Sim
0
0
Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs through Differential Privacy (DP) in conjunction with RL. Following the influential work of Ziegler et al. (2020), we study two dominant paradigms: (i) alignment via RL without human in the loop (e.g., positive review generation) and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF) (e.g., summarization in a human-preferred way). We give a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL, and prove its correctness. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering competitive utility while ensuring strong privacy protections.
5/6/2024
Toward Optimal LLM Alignments Using Two-Player Games
Rui Zheng, Hongyi Guo, Zhihan Liu, Xiaoying Zhang, Yuanshun Yao, Xiaojun Xu, Zhaoran Wang, Zhiheng Xi, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang, Hang Li, Yang Liu
0
0
The standard Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) framework primarily focuses on optimizing the performance of large language models using pre-collected prompts. However, collecting prompts that provide comprehensive coverage is both tedious and challenging, and often fails to include scenarios that LLMs need to improve on the most. In this paper, we investigate alignment through the lens of two-agent games, involving iterative interactions between an adversarial and a defensive agent. The adversarial agent's task at each step is to generate prompts that expose the weakness of the defensive agent. In return, the defensive agent seeks to improve its responses to these newly identified prompts it struggled with, based on feedback from the reward model. We theoretically demonstrate that this iterative reinforcement learning optimization converges to a Nash Equilibrium for the game induced by the agents. Experimental results in safety scenarios demonstrate that learning in such a competitive environment not only fully trains agents but also leads to policies with enhanced generalization capabilities for both adversarial and defensive agents.
6/18/2024